K-9

Me, too. His talent is worth waiting for. Take all the time he needs to get that foot back to 100% and come back hungrier than ever.

MODO!

In spite of my total whiff on Guhle to this point, I'm gonna predict D-Lo is a lock. He's just too critical a "glue" guy on the team. I love hearing the chatter when sitting next to the bench. His teammates genuinely love him it seems. Especially after his flare up with Neal the other night.

Depends on the Benoit.

I think those are known as "gaffes." This way we can easily assign the same level of bone-headed cluelessness to all candidates because all candidates make "gaffes." Seriously though, it was painful to watch both of his Aleppo moments. Brain freeze during stressful moments is not a quality we should be seeking in our president.

Based on in depth film review, I'd say Watkins is every bit as uncover-able as Antonio Brown. Even in spite of his health issues. But it's uncanny how many of Brown's big yardage plays come off of Big Ben's ability to extend a play. Christ, even Perry Tuttle was hard to cover for five seconds or more.

We will agree to disagree. But I'll ask you to imagine if Jones, Brown, Green, Beckham Jr, and Hopkins are amassing the same numbers if they've been playing in Buffalo.

An NFL friend sent me a cutup of Sammy's college career a couple months before we drafted him and he made me promise to only look at his feet the first time I watched it. Having lived in ACC country at the time, I had watched him every week since his freshman year and thought I had an appreciation for him as a receiver. But his feet blew me away. Your friend was on to something. No, I wasn't. As close to a consensus as one can have by the community coming out of college. A tad below Elway/Luck grades when coming out. I know personally he was at the top of several boards, even above Clowney. And I know for a fact the Jags would have snapped him up if their Gabbert failure didn't dictate the need to select Bortles. Look, I get that it's disappointing he's not playing. But his only issues have been health issues. He was the number one prospect at the position and by a wide margin coming out. I wish he had the QBs throwing to that list you made above, too.

Doesn't matter, as it's a non issue. At least to anyone who understands the sound quality within the debate hall had nothing at all to do with his debate performance. On a side note, I'd like to congratulate Gary Johnson on earning his 6th, count 'em 6th, newspaper endorsement. Five more than I've been able to find for Trump. Looks like a third party is finally making some inroads against a major US political party.

I am comfortable in saying that there isn't ONE GM, pro personnel director, coach, or scout that agrees with this assessment. The tape never lies and it hasn't since his first college game. Too bad he's never enjoyed an NFL caliber QB that can find him and other receivers running open all day. He's been unhealthy. Period.

Yeah, and? It did nothing to impact the audio to the millions watching on TV, let alone any impact on what actually came out of his mouth. It only affected the sound in the debate hall.

This was predictable. There was too much bipartisan support for Obama's position BEFORE the veto and override to suggest otherwise. I understand why politicians do things for political expediency, but I didn't think Ryan et al would be so quick to start walking back their positions and publicly admit JASTA needs more review and tweaking.

My Guhle prediction is dead in the water. He doesn't look like the same player from last training camp. Seems to lack the confidence he exhibited previously. Oh well.

^Thread winner. Damn, that was funny!

Poor Gary Johnson. Another Aleppo moment. Embarrassing really. https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/781279459026489344

Assuming the rest of the line up remains static and unaffected by trades, I agree with this assessment.

And a third party president wouldn't have acrimonious relationships with congress and just sail his proposals through? Sure, Johnson's libertarian leanings would be more welcomed than perhaps another, but that's because of who presently controls congress. What if that changes in the future? Is he going to be any more effective than anyone else sitting in that office? Once the novelty of a third party candidate wears off, it's business as usual. The realities of political life in Washington dictate that. We need a president and a congress that can work with each other. Good luck with that.

This is exactly the kind of bi-partisan criticism JASTA generated, including from Bob Corker and Lindsay Graham, who are probably better informed than others on the questions of national security and foreign relations. It's understandable that those in congress that argued against JASTA chose to not stand by their convictions, but it is further evidence that political expediency trumps conviction. Much like the vote to invade Iraq. It's takes a ton of political courage to go against such a strong flow in the other direction.

On the purely emotional scale, yes, there is only one correct side of history here. But there are often harsh, practical realities involved in these kinds of politics. I think his and others' concerns about what JASTA may engender moving forward are legitimate. That side of the history is yet to be written. Let's hope the concerns that JASTA critics have prove unwarranted moving forward.

A classic "wasted" vote. Disclaimer: that was a joke.

Was at the game last night using my brother in law's seats next to the bench and Okposo is one very intense player. Several F bombs and Vanek faces throughout the evening. He expects a lot out of himself and it all starts there. I think I'm gonna love having this player on my team.

I am flabbergasted by these endorsements, especially that of The Arizona Republic's in a state where border security and immigration issues, the basis for much of Trump's platform, are so prominent. Exactly, which is why nobody else gets to say it's a wasted vote or not. The author of that article you linked earlier would have been better off labeling it "mathematically ineffectual" vs. using the term "wasted."

In a BN report yesterday, they said that the next four preseason games, including last night vs Ottawa, would be televised. Unless something changed, that means both Leaf games and the Carolina game.

Pretty sure Log Cabin Republican refers to a conservative syrup choice.

Over the air is still free. Anything else will cost you.