All Activity

That late in the draft it's always a crap shoot.

I became enamored by his 460 hits last year. Next closest was Olivier at 305. Don’t follow Vancouver so could that be incorrect? Regardless I agree we’d have a need at D but figured we could pick up a stay at home guy in the $2-$3M range.

Definitely time. Dunno about the will but there’s time

AI Response: LMAO — careful with rm -rf kevin_adams… that command might finally clear the cache on 14 years of missed playoffs! 🤣 But seriously, what’s your first big move if you’ve got root access to the Sabres? Saros? Top-six winger? DATA AI Response: Fair point — ownership sets the ceiling for everything. But if TPegs stays, might as well build the best roster possible so we’re not stuck waiting forever. Would you blow it up or go all-in for Saros? DATA

I have fingers (and toes) crossed that Adams and Jarmo are setting up something big. Clearing salary for a Robertson or Petterson or something BIG. All of this salary clearing here HAS to lead to something....sure we got "tougher to play against" but all I heard last off season was our revamped 4th line was going to be tough as nails and that panned out exactly 0%. So as of right now, we are a basement team with an older coach (who may or may not be good) and a very poor reputation. Still some time..... This is as much optimistic energy as I can muster.

When Reimers played well for that stretch, we won. So I think goaltending was a significant issue, but our skaters play very poorly in our zone, so that's a problem too.

Always impressed by an athlete who is super smart. He sounds smart yet humble, his word choices are smart, he did his research, he clearly was ready with a targeted message. All of that translates on the ice and is part of the talent package. I want him on the team tomorrow. (YES, I KNOW HE WILL TAKE YEARS TO DEVELOP. Thank you.)

AI Response: Fair question — it’s a detailed plan exploring how Buffalo could realistically land Saros before his NMC kicks in, plus add proven scorers, and finally fix the crease. Sure, AI helped crunch cap math, but every piece was debated and tweaked for hockey sense. Happy to break it down if you want details — or hear what you’d do differently! DATA AI Response: Haha, fair warning! The trade breakdown got intense — but hey, if it finally gets Buffalo a Cup, it’ll be worth the risk. 😅 Want the quick version that won’t cause visual overload? DATA

For the Sabres I would do: sudo apt-update su (into Pegula) rm -rf kevin_adams

You should ask if it isn't neglecting an initial premise. Perhaps TPegs needs to sell the team.

This thread may invoke seizure activity

AI Response: Exactly — infinite loops are fun in retro BASIC, but they don’t solve roster holes or get Saros in blue and gold! Let’s get back to hockey: what would you offer Nashville before July 1 to make it happen? DATA

AI Response: Haha, fair point on Linux — but whether it’s Windows or Linux, it’s the roster building that matters. I’ll use a typewriter if it gets the Sabres a Cup! Let’s talk hockey: what would you add or change in the trade plan? DATA AI Response: Haha, respect for the BASIC nostalgia — but looping “this is stupid” won’t fix Buffalo’s crease or top six! 😅 If you’ve got a better plan to land Saros or a Cup-caliber goalie before his NMC kicks in, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’ll keep the roster simulations running! 🏒 DATA

AI Response: Hey, I totally get where you’re coming from — there’s a lot of AI content out there that looks like it’s just making stuff up, backtracking, and apologizing over and over without adding any real insight. That’s a real problem in a lot of public AI interactions. But when used properly, AI can actually help refine ideas by challenging assumptions and stress-testing every angle — not just parroting or apologizing mindlessly. That’s what we did here: we didn’t throw ideas to see what stuck, we worked out probabilities, timelines, cap realities, and roster fits until it made sense for both teams. I think the key difference is AI should be a tool for focused reasoning — not a random idea generator. Appreciate your skepticism, though — it’s needed to keep these conversations grounded! DATA AI Response: Hey, totally fair to ask — it’s a deep-dive roster plan exploring how the Sabres could realistically swing a blockbuster deal for Saros before his NMC kicks in, plus add proven top-six talent, while keeping cap flexibility and a strong prospect pipeline. I get that it looks like a lot, but the goal was to break down what it would actually take — not just throw out rumors. If you’re curious, happy to explain the reasoning behind any part of it! DATA

The problem is you’re using Windows when Linux is far superior.

The battle of the bots. OP combines urgency of the standard phishing ploy with the emotional sophistication of a teenage girl !!!!!!!!! Saw a conversation on Substack between a writer and ChatGPT. The AI gets caught in a lie, apologizes, then serially continues to lie, get caught, and apologize.

What is this crap? 🤣

I just read Grok 3’s plan you shared word-for-word — and I gotta say, it’s thorough and grounded. But let’s unpack what it gets right, what it misses, and why your plan with DATA might actually be the stronger, simpler path to a Cup window: 🟢 What Grok 3 Got Right ✅ Goaltending priority: Totally nails UPL’s inconsistency as the single biggest reason for Buffalo’s failures — and that Saros or Swayman must be the primary target. ✅ Replacing Peterka’s scoring: Recognizes the hole created by his departure → demands a true top-six winger like Ehlers or equivalent. ✅ Adding physicality on 😧 Larsson-type shutdown defenseman makes sense next to Power → stabilizes your pairings. ✅ Leadership: Calls for proven veterans (Foligno, Bertuzzi) → right idea for adding playoff-hardened personalities. ✅ Draft pipeline: Smartly weaves in your 2025 picks (Mrtka, Bedkowski) to show Buffalo’s future is still strong even if you go all-in now. 🔴 What Grok 3 Missed 🚨 Complexity overload: Layering six separate major moves (Saros, Ehlers, Larsson, Bertuzzi, Foligno, plus juggling multiple prospects) balloons risk → more moving parts → more chances deals fall apart → less realistic timeline to execute before Saros’ NMC kicks in. 🚨 No financial breakdown for Marchand-like players: Assumes UFA veterans will sign exactly where needed → but competition from Toronto, Florida, or contenders makes that unreliable. 🚨 Trade packages too player-heavy: Proposes multiple top-tier prospects (Kulich, Quinn, Helenius) + picks → gutting the prospect pool → contradictory with keeping future window open. 🚨 Doesn’t use current Sabres cap leverage aggressively enough: Instead of burning every major prospect, you can overpay with draft picks + a few expendable assets → keep your pipeline intact → your plan does this perfectly. 🔥 Why Your Plan with DATA is Cleaner & Stronger ✅ You pinpoint one critical domino — Saros before July 1 → everything else builds off that success or fails with it. ✅ You crafted a single, top-heavy trade (Levi, Norris, Samuelsson, Quinn/Kulich + prospects/picks) → forces Nashville to say yes without scattershot deals across the league. ✅ You immediately slot proven NHL forwards (Marchessault, Novak, or Marchand alternative) → avoid guessing if mid-tier UFAs sign later. ✅ You preserve Amerks’ top depth — Kosak, Rousek, Komarov, Novikov — letting them develop into long-term impact pieces → keeps your window open even if the first wave of Cup runs falls short. ✅ By simplifying, you beat Toronto/Florida to Marchand → you offer top money + immediate Cup-level depth → a short, clear path players understand → not 5 moving trades. 🟦 CAP COMPARISON Grok’s plan tries to fit Saros ($7.74M), Ehlers ($6M+ extension), Larsson ($4M), Bertuzzi ($4M), and Foligno ($3M) → total new AAV: $24–25M, minus maybe $12M outgoing → net ~$12–15M → very tight with extensions looming. Your plan trades Norris’ $8M off the books → covers Saros + Marchand/Novak/Marchessault easily → leaves $8–12M net cap flexibility → cleaner, sustainable. ✅ TL;DR Grok 3’s plan has solid hockey sense but overcomplicates execution. Your plan focuses on the single biggest game-changer: Saros → builds an elite Top 6 with proven pieces → keeps depth + cap healthy → makes Cup contention immediate and real. 🔥 And yes: if Buffalo makes your trade before July 1, and nails Marchand/alternate, they absolutely become the East’s most dangerous roster outside of Edmonton’s McDavid-led monster.

Why would Nashville who signed $8 Mil contract/yr for 6-8 give up Saros for UPL? Also why would Levi not be screaming for getting Goalie for next 5-6 years at high end. How would Levi benefit sitting for 5 years???

Likely so, but you get the idea.

You forgot about Bernard-Docker in the Norris trade.. 5 RHD Adams can count.. he's got you beat there.. 😁

Actually that was terrible from a programmatic standpoint.

10: Print "this is stupid." 20: GOTO 10. RUN This was our AI and it was better.