All Activity
- Past hour
-
Yeah, he isn't getting traded this summer. But by getting him in at under $7MM, they have an extra $750k to spend on that middle 6 (top 6 ideally, but the money they'll have left says middle 6) F the team desperately needs for when someone in the top 6 inevitably breaks or when one of the guys pencilled into the top 6 underperforms. So, not a building block transaction, but if it leaves enough cash to bring in something to improve, will take it. (Beggars can't be choosers.) And then, the D will have been improved, the F's might've improved, and the GT on paper isn't any worse. Round here that's a win, right? (Lord, please send that asteroid soon and take us all out of our misery.)
-
Right thatās what Iām saying: heās not getting traded this summer People that are dreamily envisioning it as a building block transaction for something to improve this summer are mistaken - thatās what Iām saying (nm that being beyond Adamsā capacity) There wasnāt āmore comingā after the JJ trade - it wasnāt the āfirst shoeā. remember? āIāll judge the Peterka deal when we see whatās nextā nothing was next . Iāll happily eat the shoe if there is - - -
-
Had they punted Wilford, would not only hope the D will be better with the changes, but would actually expect it. (Now, would those changes be enough to materially alter their results, no data, but it would legitimately be in the realm of possibilities.) As it is, with keeping Wilford, it is likely too little to materially make this a truly good D. So truly despise watching the D stand around unengaged in front of the goalie; but that isn't as bad has having both of them go behind the net to try to prevent the pass to the now wide open slotman.
-
Yes, Kessās trajectory can be elite. This team is going to have to be better than everyone else by being better at the blue line than everyone else. Itās just the way that it is when you draft #1 overall at the blue line twice. Hope is a ***** strategy, but I hope the blue line takes a huge step forward. Itās the most logical path toward this team being elite. And no credit to KA if and when that happens.
-
Ya, next year. Heās not getting traded this summer. D is improved. I do not think adding Kesselring trims the D by THIRTY GOALS, no. Not 30. Peterka was one of our best PP players relatively - itās just that our entire PP was bad. Heād have been the first to benefit if we actually, you know, changed the pp coaches - - - Not really trying to have an argument - if you want to argue Kesselring for Peterka is a wash: fine. Thatās fine. So Adams made a lateral move he only made BECAUSE jj asked for a deal. Ok. So we are the same. Weā¦sat in last almost the whole year and havenāt made the playoffs in 14 years Thereās..no plan for improvement? If JJ doesnāt ask out we justā¦do nothing? we havenāt done anything
-
If they didn't have a weenie running the PP, they'd be giving Byram time on the top unit along WITH Dahlin. They're only running 1 true set up man on the PP running 1-4. Go to 2-3 and you add another one. BUT they have a weenie running the PP, so no, Byram will either be on a 2D 2nd unit like he often was last year or not on one at all.
-
Honestly, thatās ok. Defense Dahlin-Byram Power-Kesselring Timmons-Samuelsson To me, that trims the goals against by 30ish compared to last year to cover for Peterka and his poor D and not much PP production. Plus Bo & OP should continue to ascend in ability. Bo & Dahls were elite together last year. No argument there. Kess and Power should be better because it is OPās best partner to date. Sammy at third pair minutes is a better fit than his previous top four role. Protected minutes could keep him healthier and more productive. I still want a top six forward, but the D core is better with Bo here. Our GM still sucks, but I think this is best case with Bo here at this point and if we blow next yearā¦he can be traded with a year to go for the new team. Cost controlled next year is OK.