slapshot1619 Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 NHL.com do I dare say it looked in? :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilmour93woo Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 I gotta say as a hard core DEVILS season ticket holder this board is classy! Great game lastnight one of the best all season seems though lots of sabres fans that were in Jersey lastnight are on the band wagon! Rude SCUMBAGS.........they don't know the LaFontaines......Malarchuks.........Rays......Plantes........Hannans of the Sabres. you guys are the real deal best of luck and lets go DEVILS! Great board......http://ww.realdevilsfans.com that is our board it is very harsh, careful what you say! GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To bad the NHL hates the DEVILS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWarner Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 The Devils fan next too me said his friend called him and the Devils announcers said it was in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Uh...what are you linking to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapshot1619 Posted February 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 I was just linking to nhl home page As the current frozen moment is the save that miller made on I believe Elias. but I have now fixed the link to go directly to that pic... my apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightrider Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Just in case the link changes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 That a great pic(and was a fantastic save), but unless you have the overhead angle, there is no way to tell if that puck is across the goal line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slugspirit Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 The overhead angle showed that it was indeed in. Not that this goal would have mattered anyways. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 The overhead angle showed that it was indeed in. Not true. No replay showed that it was in the net. Was part of Miller's glove in the net? Yes, but it was not enough to overturn the call as the actual puck could not be seen as it was in the glove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Not true. No replay showed that it was in the net. Was part of Miller's glove in the net? Yes, but it was not enough to overturn the call as the actual puck could not be seen as it was in the glove. You have the position of the puck in the glove in that picture above. Combine that with the location of the glove in the overhead shot and it would be enough for Toronto to overturn the call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slugspirit Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 Not true. No replay showed that it was in the net. Was part of Miller's glove in the net? Yes, but it was not enough to overturn the call as the actual puck could not be seen as it was in the glove. There indeed was an angle with a majority of Miller's glove in the net, excluding the part guarding his wrist. Through the webbing of his glove you could see the puck. The NJ broadcast showed this shot as soon as they returned from the first commercial after the play. http://www.members.shaw.ca/online409/goal.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 There indeed was an angle with a majority of Miller's glove in the net, excluding the part guarding his wrist. Through the webbing of his glove you could see the puck. The NJ broadcast showed this shot as soon as they returned from the first commercial after the play. http://www.members.shaw.ca/online409/goal.JPG I say it should've been a goal, but that picture is still slightly misleading. It's at a slight angle since the goal line also appears to be in the goal. That picture alone isn't conclusive either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slugspirit Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 I say it should've been a goal, but that picture is still slightly misleading. It's at a slight angle since the goal line also appears to be in the goal. That picture alone isn't conclusive either. I agree that it's slightly misleading. It's a shame that this is the angle for most overhead shots in the NHL. However, the live video (when slowed down) is much easier to depict. You can easily see the puck moving in the webbing of the glove and the position of Miller's hand makes up for the slightly misleading camera angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted February 5, 2007 Report Share Posted February 5, 2007 I agree that it's slightly misleading. It's a shame that this is the angle for most overhead shots in the NHL. However, the live video (when slowed down) is much easier to depict. You can easily see the puck moving in the webbing of the glove and the position of Miller's hand makes up for the slightly misleading camera angle. I was making myself dinner as they showed that replay, so I missed it. Emmerick really annoys me, but he's pretty unbiased when he calls games, so I trust what I heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.