darksabre Posted November 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2014 Well, I think enough time has passed. What say you, Vanek or Phaneuf? http://forums.sabrespace.com/topic/1438-dion-phaneuf-vs-thomas-vanek/#entry I think Taro is still right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 I think Taro is still right. Philosophically he may be right but factually Vanek wasn't quite the sniper we could rely on when needed. He's a great talent just not the franchise carrying forward we wanted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny DangerFace Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 Philosophically he may be right but factually Vanek wasn't quite the sniper we could rely on when needed. He's a great talent just not the franchise carrying forward we wanted. Isn't it kinda funny thar phaneuf is kind of the defensive vanek in the sense of what toronto fans complain about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 Isn't it kinda funny thar phaneuf is kind of the defensive vanek in the sense of what toronto fans complain about Their careers are more similar than dissimilar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 Philosophically he may be right but factually Vanek wasn't quite the sniper we could rely on when needed. He's a great talent just not the franchise carrying forward we wanted. That wasn't obvious in Vanek's rookie year and the reason he was that high of a pick is because that's what he'd been for Minnesota. You're critiquing it based on a full decade + since he was drafted. He was the right pick @ the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 That wasn't obvious in Vanek's rookie year and the reason he was that high of a pick is because that's what he'd been for Minnesota. You're critiquing it based on a full decade + since he was drafted. He was the right pick @ the time. I wasnt saying anything different Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGR4GM Posted November 14, 2014 Report Share Posted November 14, 2014 I miss hitting all of your posts with negative feedback simply because I thought it was hilarious how seriously you took it. Thank god that system didn't last because they're always ridiculous. Yea you and Korab, ahh the good old days lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.