Wyldnwoody44 Posted October 30 Report Posted October 30 1 hour ago, inkman said: Coffee with Italian Sauage is certainly a choice. Lubes the colon straight up 1 hour ago, shrader said: Why didn’t you ask them? As long as you don’t take a dickish tone I bet they probably would have answered you. I did, I spoke with the security guy and said I've been coming in for years with my coffee because there was a partnership with Tim Hortons. He wasn't a dick, he felt bad for us I think lol. I think the new security screening may have been a part of it. But he said only a clear bottled water is what he was directed to allowed in. 1 Quote
LTS Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago The increasing trend of society to focus on the 1% of negativity versus the 99% of neutral to positive. Every GD meeting at work is this way. It happens here too. Hell it happens everywhere. I wouldn't be surprised if someone submitted a paper title "Time Travle: Now a Reality" and it was rejected during peer review because of the typo. "Did you read it?" "Yeah" "What feedback do you have?" "Well clearly you spelled travel wrong, so you're an idiot." I can't wait for the day when society finally understands that just because you can comment it doesn't mean you should. Quote
Weave Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, LTS said: The increasing trend of society to focus on the 1% of negativity versus the 99% of neutral to positive. Every GD meeting at work is this way. It happens here too. Hell it happens everywhere. I wouldn't be surprised if someone submitted a paper title "Time Travle: Now a Reality" and it was rejected during peer review because of the typo. "Did you read it?" "Yeah" "What feedback do you have?" "Well clearly you spelled travel wrong, so you're an idiot." I can't wait for the day when society finally understands that just because you can comment it doesn't mean you should. SDS fears that day. Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, LTS said: The increasing trend of society to focus on the 1% of negativity versus the 99% of neutral to positive. Every GD meeting at work is this way. It happens here too. Hell it happens everywhere. I wouldn't be surprised if someone submitted a paper title "Time Travle: Now a Reality" and it was rejected during peer review because of the typo. "Did you read it?" "Yeah" "What feedback do you have?" "Well clearly you spelled travel wrong, so you're an idiot." I can't wait for the day when society finally understands that just because you can comment it doesn't mean you should. It's just the world, in my field, I had an upset family member because I had to sedate their mother overnight (because she was legit jumping on the bed like a trampoline) and was 90+ years old... One of many sundowning patients in the unit. They came in in the AM and make a huge stink, when we asked if they would like to be contacted to talk to her to see if they could calm her down "no, we need our sleep" WTF. So even though that week there were at least 3 medical saves and awesome things that made us not hate our lives and careers, the admin felt it necessary to have 1:1 meetings about that case as well as me being handed a book about geriatrics by our Amazing passive aggressive c0cksucker of a CMO. Can't wait to leave this field. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.