Archie Lee

It's kind of a tone deaf move. Bryson wasn't going anywhere until July 1st at the earliest. It's not a big material move (he can be waived with no cap impact), but Adams could have waited until after some off-season maneuvers were completed and then determined if Bryson was a depth addition that was needed. Or, is this an indication that our internal analytics view Bryson more highly than public models? I guess that one of the limitations of the proprietary analytics of individual teams, is that there is a limited pool of players available. Just because you have analytics that tell you a player isn't very good, doesn't mean you can just go out and get a better one. Teams still need $900k 4th pairing d-men. It's just, when you are in year 14 out of the playoffs and as a GM you are headed into year 6 of your tenure, you would think there would be some level of self-awareness that this isn't the sort of move that will instill optimism in anyone. If anything, it's the opposite.

It was a pretty entertaining game. There were lots of Sabres that did some things for stretches of time that gave me cause to think that a good hockey person could get this on the right path fairly quickly. And, we lost, again, in a rather embarrassing fashion; so, there is at least, maybe, a small possibility that the accumulative impact is that Pegula has had enough and opts to make the needed changes. I never want the Sabres to lose, but in times like this there is at least a silver lining in defeat.

To me, the thing to remember is that we were right there. One point out. We finished 22-23 with 2 more points than what Montreal is on pace for this year. Adams had us on the brink, and then p!$$3d it away on a “don’t block the kids” philosophy and on a flawed concept of roster construction. I read an interview with Montreal GM Kent Hughes where he actually spoke about learning from the mistakes made by the Sabres. How sad is it that other teams are learning more from Adams’s mistakes, than Adams has learned?

At the time, Hall was much more highly regarded than he is now. I’m sure he had other offers. I doubt he would have taken a one year deal with the Sabres, in the middle of Covid, without a full NTC. Without the NTC, he almost certainly does not sign with the Sabres.

I was thinking about this when it comes to Cozens. It might well be that Norris is the all around better player than Cozens. What is almost certain though, is that Norris is not better than what Cozens was projected to be. When he signed his big contract, I think it is fair to say that we fans generally thought Cozens was the long-term, 30 goal, 70 point, two-way, big, hard to play against, 2nd line centre, that cup-contending NHL teams dream of. That was probably too much to expect. Norris isn’t that. Add in that we no longer are sure that Thompson is a centre, let alone a 1st line centre, and it’s pretty sobering. My point? Adams, or whoever the GM next year might be, can’t hide behind “building for long-term success” any longer. A big piece of the foundation, is gone. It is (past)time to pivot to primarily serving the now and not the future. I’m not talking about recklessly throwing away assets. But, in my view, Dahlin, Byram, Power, Clifton, Thompson, Norris, Tuch, McLeod, Zucker, Greenway, Peterka, Benson, Luukkonen, are more than a good enough starting point (give or take a trade or two), for a playoff team. We should have been there this year. There are no excuses except for ineptitude.

I was listening to the Athletic Hockey Podcast and they were discussing how Tampa has almost nothing of value left in their system re: prospects or draft picks. And they quoted the GM, BriseBois, repeating a variation of an old saying: “I will have much less regret over trying and failing, than I will over failing to try.” Going back to the trade deadline of 2023, Adams made the fatal mistake of failing to try. This mistake was an unforced error that he has since repeated. It has set them back another 2-3 years at least. I’m still in. It’s too late for me to be out on the Sabres. But, I really have zero interest and certainly no enthusiasm, for Adams getting another year to do what a good GM would have done two years ago.

I think you are overstating things. Hockey and football are different. Do you really think Bruce Cassidy, Pete DeBoer, Jerad Bednar, Rick Tochett, etc., etc., just skip past their GM's and POHO's and go right to the owner with their concerns? Agreed. The issue is 94% not the org chart, but the men filling the positions.

I think it is the opposite. The reason we don't see hits like this all the time is because players no longer seek to blow-up their opponents with predatory hits. That doesn't mean it never happens. Also, to support your point to a degree, the fact that players are now more respectful of their opponents does mean that players are perhaps more likely to put themselves in vulnerable positions. In short, Kulich would never have imagined that an opponent would take advantage of him in a vulnerable position and drive their elbow through his face, because players generally don't do that.

My answer to the bolded question is: almost none. Hits like this are available every game. I will often see a player opt against such a hit. I can only assume this is because players recognize when their opponent is in a vulnerable position. The game forces players to frequently skate bent over, or to look down at the ice for the puck, or to reach with their stick. I'm not saying Howden intended to hit Kulich in a manner that caused injury. The game happens fast. Just as instincts can lead a player to put himself in a vulnerable position, instincts can also lead a player to commit to a check that is dangerous. We know today the potential long-term impact of such hits to the head. Suspending players for such hits, is a must.

I think this only works if the GM and HC are essentially on the same page and are going to the owner with the same things. If the GM and HC are going to the owner with different visions on the coaching staff or roster, then it seems like a recipe for disaster.

UPL has had a terrible season. It’s not a shock that he is in that spot. He’s the starting goalie on one of the league’s worst teams. #2 and 3 on the list? Noted team killers Jeremy Swayman and Juuse Saros. UPL has to be better. But, Lindy Ruff’s system/structure is murder on goalies. Ignoring the root cause of an issue is never a good thing.

Per PuckPedia, the Sabres retain signing rights on Leinonen until June 1, 2026. Leinonen has had a solid year in SWE1, including two strong playoff wins recently. If his contract status in Sweden allows it, I think it would make sense for him to come over to North America next year and play for the Amerks or, if not quite ready, for Jacksonville. Also, per PuckPedia, these are the players who the Sabres will lose signing rights on this spring or summer: Matteo Costantini, Viljami Marjala, William von Barnekow, and Ethan Miedema. I admit I have not seen any of these players play. Costantini seems like a potential minor league player. I will be slightly disappointed if we don't sign Marjala or Miedema. My guess is that, at this point, we won't sign Marjala for certain. The reason I would be disappointed is that I think they have outperformed their draft positions, particularly Marjala. Marjala was taken in round 5 in 2021. He just turned 22 and has 51 points in 53 games in Liiga (though only 8 goals). He is 14th in scoring in the league, with no player his age or younger having a better offensive year (thus far). Miedema was drafted in rd 4 in 2023. He will be 20 in a week. He has 54 points in 62 OHL games (20 goals). He's big at 6'4" and 210 lbs. He has 69 PMs. To me it just begs the question: why acquire extra picks and why bother with 4th and 5th rd picks if you aren't even going to sign the ones who out perform their draft position? It's not that I expect either player to make the NHL. But we have so many prospects (and so many forward prospects in particular), and we have been so reluctant to trade any of the higher ranked ones (Savoie the exception), that we have, in my view, deprived many of them of oxygen.

With the $4.44 going to the Skinner buyout next year, and using your contract projections, this comes in around $89 million. Leaving around $6 million for a 4th line, 3rd pair D, and then spares.

You would to dump one more player in the $4-5 million range. And Ekblad would be your only add.

Right. There should be a POHO, or a Senior Advisor or two, or just a better GM. Having Karmanos in the next office isn't going to make a big difference.

No disagreement. We are in no position to put pressure on the NHL to change the owner though.

Good point. Do it Terry.

I don't mean to say it would be wrong to have your associate and assistant GM's residing in Buffalo and in the office daily. It might even be preferrable. It also is good to cast a wide net and find the best people. But, I thought I would look at other teams and their assistant GMs. Started at the top of the NHL standings with the Jets. Didn't need to go further. They have two assistant GMs. 1.) Craig Heisinger, Sr. Vice President & Director, Hockey Ops / Assistant General Manager. He is the GM of the Moose. He's from Manitoba. From his bio on the Jets website: "Heisinger began his tenure with the Manitoba Moose as the team’s Equipment Manager." 2.) Larry Simmons, Vice President & Assistant General Manager. From his bio: "He and his wife, Cheryl, reside in Atlanta..." Not too much worry on this stuff from Jet fans, would be my guess. Being concerned about such things is, in my view, taking our eyes off the ball. Adams is a demonstrably awful GM. That's what needs to change.

Having now read the article, there is one theme through the text that worries me re: the unlikelihood there will be change this off-season. That is the theme that there has been too much change. I think there is a chance that Pegula is also concerned about the perception that he fires GMs and coaches too quickly. Adams has clearly been given long enough and things are currently going in the wrong direction. But Ruff is only in year one.

And trade value.

Very well said. I’m very pleased that the Sabres are getting a lot of attention in the national media discourse. If there is any chance that Pegula makes changes, the negative national attention will hopefully assist in leading him to the right conclusion. Of course, people generally don't like to be told what to do (billionaires, likely more so); I guess it could have the opposite impact too.

On Karmanos living in Pittsburgh. We have known this all along. How often is he in Rochester or Buffalo or on the road scouting? Is it common for assistant GM's in the NHL to live elsewhere? I think this is the sort of thing that is not uncommon and that people only become focused on it when a team is losing. Further, I think media and fan concern over such things only gives an owner or GM a chance to "fix things" by insisting the assistant GM move to Buffalo. There are lots of reasons for why the Sabres are awful; where Jason Karmanos's permanent residence is, in my view, does not register as a factor. On Friedman and Biz, I don't know, could these not be variations of the same meeting? Dahlin is concerned about the future, and expresses frustration that he is going into the 8th year of his career without being in the playoffs, and states or implies or hints that he's not sure how much longer he can take it. And Adams lays out the plan for the off-season and Dahlin leaves the meeting at least satisfied that Adams intends to make improvements, if not entirely confident that Adams will be able to? The meeting is cordial and nobody is demanding anything, but it's clear that things need to improve soon because the patience among some players, including Dahlin, is understandably wearing thin. The big picture is, it's not a good thing when your young captain and star player hasn't made the playoffs once in his 7 year career, and when the team is further away now then they were 3 years ago, and when he is meeting with the GM to discuss how the mess is going to be fixed.

There are maybe two parts to promoting a player. 1). Is the player ready for the NHL? 2). Is the current NHL team environment set-up for that player to have success? It could be argued that having too many young guys in the NHL at the same time, amounts to rushing them. So, it’s not that any particular player was in the NHL too soon relative to their own personal readiness, but many of our young players were in Buffalo sooner than the Sabres were able to provide them with the best environment for developing their games.

Just in case I was unclear, by “not a thing” I meant “not an issue” for that type of role. I’ve since listened to the interview. My take is that where Karmanos lives was being discussed in the context of the lack of experienced management people around Adams and that the one experienced person they have lives in Pittsburgh. So, not so much that it’s wrong for a person in Karmanos’s role to live in Pittsburgh, but it would be good to have someone with senior NHL management experience in Buffalo.

I have to say, of all the things wrong with this org, the assistant GM living in Pittsburgh is maybe the furthest thing down the list. Actually, it’s 2025. I don’t even think this is a thing.