Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,379
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Didn’t his brother get into some trouble?
  2. Ya it’s just tough to argue with the correlation between youth=failure to make the playoffs I’m not saying it’s binding but I’d feel more comfortable if we didn’t enter the year as the youngest again
  3. I think I’d rather have Ehlers All prospects pools are overrated Draft picks are overrated
  4. @dudacek this is very promising, this sort of represents the unfolding of exactly what I was hoping for when I talked about doing what we could to *separate* from the league in the bottom 6, if we couldn’t match up in the top 6. Not just address the bottom 6, elevate relative to other teams to make up the gap have to do something. This represents creativity from Adams
  5. Do you know if we’ve gotten older?
  6. Peterka - Thompson - Tuch Benson - Cozens - Quinn Zucker - McLeod - Greenway Malenstyn - Lafferty - Aube-Kubel
  7. Looks like that guy from Dawsons creek
  8. “Did the Sabres trade too good of a prospect?” urghhh hook it to my veins MY VEINS
  9. We’ve become the Ricky Bobby Sabres. Born to go fast
  10. Man Krebs stinks I’m not saying YOU are. But the tweet is pretty see through in that regard. I’m familiar with that account
  11. We are witnessing the best effort Adams has to give, right on time, when he most needs it i wish him luck.
  12. I have to laugh at this people, we don’t need to trash Savoie now. The point is that he’s a GOOD PROSPECT That’s half of what makes the trade so promising
  13. I think the trade WAS the apology
  14. I agree. All these boring moves leave the end result still very much in question, but at least now we’ve completed ALL of the boring moves necessary for that to be viable the revamped bottom 6 narrative wasn’t complete until this move
  15. Don’t really think so
  16. I take your meaning but I’m celebrating the fact it’s not a hockey trade, tbh we sold a prospect and bought a now player big day
  17. Nah, McLeod makes Savoie expendable Exactly, and that poster is tonally consistent
  18. Quote the posters you are calling out
  19. Agree. We lose some upside definitely, and the coming year is still hard to predict as this isn’t exactly a splash, but it’s very solid. It was huge to replace Krebs as 3C This is a good trade! HF: hockey FUTURE its the present, of course they hate the deal Actually it may slot Krebs off the team
  20. Quinn can play centre, right? So I guess the 3C vacancy is potentially covered even if it’s a top 6 winger we add. So that should help with options Zucker - Quinn - Greenway, could be fun
  21. Yup. I think the fact it’s hard to nail down a solid projection is sort of the emerging key - like you said, there are a lot of ifs. Therefore we can’t imo say we have enough with anything close to the amount or certainty a team on the verge of missing the playoffs 5 straight times under this regime deserves to have
×
×
  • Create New...