Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,400
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. That’s an interesting dynamic then for sure
  2. Re: the defensive additions for next season? So the ramblings were true. Score one for the insiderzz and score 1 for KA not being purely interested in Saints
  3. Good inference though, here ^ If teams were asking for Savoie, we were “in” on some bigger fish
  4. The original Muel, ftr But unlikely. Franzen was a playoff beast
  5. Hagel was a great pick though! It’s not like he forced Botterill to hate CHL players Murray was a reasonable drafter imo
  6. You know how they say a car loses half it’s value once it’s driven off the lot? The Mystery Box always has a level of appeal. “Rasmus Asplund is Rasmus Asplund, but a draft pick could be anything! Even Rasmus Asplund!” This isn’t the logic KA used here but I’m using it to illustrate the fact that, often, draft picks have more value left unopened
  7. It should be noted that the biggest loss in this deal is @Doohickie’s meme KA, today ^
  8. I think so too, and this is pretty salient. He seemed to fall out of favour with DG, both teams probably trying to do that same thing, here. Both caught in a system non-preferable to their talents I think I was referring to Asplund as Larsson light last year
  9. My posts are roulette when it comes to that, eh? Lol yes jk. No.
  10. Good add
  11. KA should have held out for Future Considerations, imo
  12. JVR stays
  13. Will this upset the room HOW WELL LIKED WAS ASPLUND I need to know
  14. It’s important to remember. The escape hatch to the “no sacrificing the future!” lingo people understandably get tired of remains the fact we can (and do) trade from our Futures Pool under the prism of the new additions also aiding said future
  15. WC arms race has begun with 10 mins left greenway....JVR... who's on the move next greenway the shot heard round the WC world lol
  16. Too bad he Tim Murray'd out by dealing 2 draft picks amirite
  17. Personally, I think it's more likely to positively affect this season than next. He's a reasonable player and he'l be in the mix for a depth role next season, but I'd guess the message to the team might play kinda well, here
  18. Well, there were reports Adams was "lurking in the weeds", right? These are the kind of value deals you see under that umbrella
×
×
  • Create New...