Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,751
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Great likeness, both mouthguard and head size
  2. I mean, ya
  3. This feels more like an oilers win but I could be wrong
  4. Forsling made a pretty big save
  5. Why would tonight be any different? You are so right:
  6. But not 3-2?!
  7. It’s ok we have the next Hasek maybe better
  8. Ya I’ll go ahead and say I called this too the nhl is so damn predictable in 2025 lol
  9. Most obvious comeback ever I’m sorry lol Then review it. It shouldn’t have more value than every other call. But the nhl is a broken league so I’m not sure there’s a starting point
  10. But if the puck goes over the glass..
  11. My thoughts at this point are honestly to get McDonkey his cup and be done with this never ending nightmare season already lol. The days start getting shorter in 9 days for jeepers sakes
  12. It’s the nhl in 2025
  13. This is rather anecdotal but leads don’t really mean very much in today’s game relative to days gone by. I remember a decade or so ago a 3 goal lead was lights out in the playoffs 99/100 times, nowadays it’s just a field goal way more often than one would think
  14. Likely a looming dynasty already if not for Vegas in the final. Maybe 3 straight
  15. I wasn’t disagreeing But really the more terrifying and accurate explanation is that “winning trades” isn’t very predictive
  16. And, really, does any other calculation matter at this time? Had there been a trade Adams *hasn’t* won? Given circumstances? I’m not sure we can complain very much that there doesn’t appear to be a correlation between “winning trades” and “winning”. Nay, it’s probably better just to change our goal
  17. What it is is revisionist. People are incredibly happy to point out when sabres players do better elsewhere, what, it can’t work the other way? The fact it does on other teams in fact proves it can work in the opposite. Casey was statistically our best F at the time we dealt him - he was demonstrably good, here. If I had to guess if he’s still he that guy, here, if he was, I’d have to say yes “Mitts for Byram was good because although Casey produced more for our team Byram is the better trade asset” is last-decade thinking get off that treadmill
  18. People will just say anything nowadays playing himself out of the league? Based on what, his production? If that’s the case we only have 6 guys on our entire team pencilled in for next year
  19. Mistake. Live dangerously
  20. That’s “greatest”. Didn’t say greatest I said best No one has played the game of hockey as well as that human. greatness in sports discussions usually involves relativity to era and career accomplishments
×
×
  • Create New...