Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    38,763
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. It stinks that Kevyn Adams
  2. I legitimately can’t. We’ve averaged 78 points for 5 years Making the playoffs isn’t even hard. Adams could get lucky next year, and boom lifetime contract
  3. “We have no choice but to hope for the best!”
  4. I’m more incredulous and surprised about it by the year
  5. Last Harry Potter movie wasn’t even out yet
  6. Exactly. What are we doing here. Adams breathes a sigh of relief if someone gets up there are thinks they are being smart by leveling these questions he can easily duck We deserve absurdity at the conference because the team has subjected us to nothing but absurdity Someone should make it a clown show because that’s what they f*cking deserve
  7. Because he’s a professional coward? How many times does it need to be said He deserves to be fired “what’s the point?” sad. doesn’t need to be one beyond it’s deserved
  8. Adams as GM: •missed playoffs 5 straight years to begin tenure •36% of the 14 year drought committed on his watch •78 point average per 82 game season •3/5 seasons of finishes in the 70s or worse •two consecutive seasons of downward progress 91➡️84 84➡️~77-79 •Author of the 3 longest non-tank-year losing streaks in franchise history
  9. That’s what I was thinking. It should be a very, very heated conference, or why do it? If ANY management deserved tough questions it’s this one in fact it’s a farce if someone doesn’t ask “by what metric can you possibly keep your job?” Harrington to his credit has written multiple times he believes KA should be fired. Fired. Not “well depending on the owner”.
  10. Don’t really like these types of polls cause I don’t want to vote “no” outright so far in advance. It’s just setting up for a “see! They proved you wrong!” which i understand would be coming, at some point, even if it took Adams until his 20th year. Never mind the concept of the appropriate turnover time for fielding a playoff team being way past, already well in the rear view as of now No I knew what you meant
  11. This reads like you are saying making it is a near given haha
  12. It’s a good point tho. I think indications always seemed to be KA would be back so it was always going to take a big change of heart, which could happen in the immediacy after the press conference I guess, like Murray then again, it’s probably more common that the GM being trotted out means he’s back, and maybe someone will ask directly or he’ll say
  13. So I guess that’s it, eh? This confirms Adams is back? I’m almost in shock. Ill enjoy my last few days I’ll hold out hope then
  14. Ya. Sure hope this doesn’t mean Adams is. I like how the Sabres aren’t even like “we will consider internally.” It’s just “ya, of course our failing coach will be back, why wouldn’t he?”
  15. They have to have some sort of calculation for the conflict of interest being created Do i want to root for Adams to find success next year when he doesn’t deserve to be here, in the last year of his deal just in time, so he gets a lifetime contact? no, not particularly If i am anything it’s consistent (to the annoyance of others): but my line for Adams is 5 years they better fire him. I’m at the end of my rope
  16. I think they are going to realize they have to do it I don’t think they are smart enough to build a team properly, but i can’t see them being dumb enough to not realize someone needs to pay the price Sometimes the pitchforks are out for good reasons
  17. And they work closely with dev in Rochester too, right? Indications are they have focused on moving Östlund’s game in this direction as well, when playmaking has generally been seen as his stand out attribute
  18. They should attack the roster on the grounds of needing to upgrade this: Benson - McLeod - Thompson Peterka - Kulich - Tuch Zucker - Krebs - Quinn Greenway - Malenstyn - Lafferty Samuelsson - Dahlin Byram - Clifton Byyson - Bernard-Docker .. to a playoff team I think an obvious need presents in a multitude of spots
  19. Comparing Norris to Eichel doesn’t serve your argument both ability wise (obviously) or healthy wise (even with Jack’s history Norris’s was/is significantly worse). People undersell the fact Norris has played like under 60% of games. And again, Eichel was the superstar piece that makes the difference between good and great. The sabres counting on Norris to achieve “passable” at the risk of 15 years is a farce I’m not opposed to Thompson back at C, tbh, he’s our best C. If he’s not: Benson - McLeod - Thompson Peterka - Norris - Tuch
  20. Shut him down from what? Not playing? Right lol Like, f*ckin: F*CK
×
×
  • Create New...