Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    39,640
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Pipeline continues
  2. 18 draft picks over the next 2 drafts. We should see a fair few moved We have to move 4 just to get to an average slate, never mind the surplus of prospects
  3. Kinda hoping Krebs is involved in a trade during the process of filling those 4 forward spots
  4. Peterka - Cozens - Tuch Benson - Thompson - Quinn Skinner - 3C - 3RW Greenway - 4C - 4RW …honestly I think we need 4 new bottom 6 players, and we’d be good with that t6. It’s 4 guys but considering our prospects and pick asset pool that should be fishing with dynamite, more less. I think Skinner is fine on L3 if there’s a shooter with him allowing him to clean up rebounds, Greenway nice in a 4th line roll. Byram - Dahlin Samuelsson - Power Clifton - Jokiharju D is fine as is. We’ve spend a ton of capital there. It’ll either be the strength of the team or we will suck. If we have to spend even more on D to make that happen we are probably screwed anyways. I like the group and it’s upside tbh UPL Levi GT should finally be ready to contribute positive results for a full season () - - - That should be a fun offseason for a GM, no? At least as far as one on the hot seat? 4 good bottom 6 forwards. Hardly an unreasonable ask.
  5. No it’s awesome I’m pretty biased but I dunno it’s awesome lol one day Kevyn will come calling for it (as president of hockey ops) and I’ll happily turn it over. For the price of a small discussion on this website, of course
  6. It’s really the starter thing, ya. And Adams thought that would be last year. And because of UPL filling the roll, we probably would have made it last year even with the goaltending situation playing out the way it did had the issues Liger mentioned been addressed. Me saying we are still on his timeline isn’t really true with the emergence of UPL. He just happened to emerge exactly when Levi was planned to (a few months delayed, admittedly). (I’m sort of torn on whether KA expected to/thought we’d make the playoffs last year.) My thing about the timeline still potentially coinciding with Levi was more of a factual aside: it may very well end up that we don’t make the playoffs until Levi has a solidified NHL roll, which could be as soon as this season
  7. The context of the conversation isn’t the cause of why we missed (though the early season goaltending was assuredly a huge factor), it’s what our timeline to success theoretically looks like to the GM. Levi not being the cause of missing doesn’t change the fact the issues that DID cause us to miss may have been symptoms of the roster being configured in such the way it was because of the expectations Adams had for competitiveness. I don’t think Adams expected us to be good until Levi was. Now, we can argue that could have been last year had the rest of the team been better, but only because UPL emerged, which to KA (and many others), was unexpected. Adams just thought it would be Levi. I understand Levi’s numbers eventually got the the point where they averaged out to reasonable backup, but the runway it took to get there and the slow start it contributed to we could never recover from isn’t dismissible when you are supposed to be measuring by results
  8. If Levi’s the backup, we’ll need 30 quality starts from him to make the playoffs. So, essentially we are on the Levi timeline. Playoffs require him to be a capable, mainstay pro Levi wasn’t ready for that last year, and we didn’t make the playoffs. Seems to line up
  9. Not much to it. I have it. For his birthday we got my Dad one of those Cameo things you could/used to be able to get from celebs/famous figures. Video message of RJ announcing the Sabres have won the Stanley Cup Dunno if others have similar but I can confirm there’s at least one version of the audio
  10. I told you all Canada hockey stinks
  11. Really need a legit 3C. Would help the other guys fall into position by working that magic
  12. I have the recording if it’s ever in need
  13. He’s the second most valued asset on the team far and away. The board just undervalues him Dahlin Power sort the rest by vibes
  14. He’s definitively among our top 12 forwards, and it’s not close either I don’t care if Benson is on track to pass him at some point next year. Ridiculous hubristic you devalue the stretch of time he won’t have done so, yet. Let alone the guys who’s wont manage to all year
  15. He’s still a net positive to me, and non-negligible, at that. People never talk about his penalty differential. No, he’s not scoring on the PP (no one is), but if they ever figure out their PP strategy, they have to get on the PP first to utilize the strategy and Skinner is one of the best players in the league at drawing penalties. Unless his salary is a hinderance to bringing in a better player outright next year, I definitely keep him on the roster: the aim is to win games and he’s not some JAG in that area
  16. Traded who?
  17. I’ve been on the “Quinn will be our best F” train for a while, Brady isn’t a guy I’d move him for I don’t think. He’s not a untouchable, I just think we can probably get Tkachuk done for some of our other prime assets
  18. Keith straddles both sides of it comfortably nowadays
  19. It did. They employed a strategically bankrupt strategy effectively and reaped the rewards.
  20. No I disagree I can continue bitching online
  21. Not only in terms of feasibility, but willingness to absorb pain
  22. They don’t forget, they are just up against competition in the nhl that not only also remembers, but has the ability to do something about it
  23. We already have our answer to this. - Adams will (probably properly) evaluate the needs - He will come to a value determination re: what he’s willing yo pay to address said needs. The answer to this question isn’t determined by value to the Sabres this season, it’s measured by a comparison of the assets in a vacuum: all avenues considered. - He will scourge the market to see if teams are willing to meet his prices and if they aren’t, he will retain his assets It’s about willingness, not ability imo More about strategy, less about evaluation
×
×
  • Create New...