apuszczalowski

That was such an underrated movie in my opinion, and the best part is watching Lopez kick the bucket!

I had to laugh when I heard it, cause from what it sounds like, they have no intentions to actually use him on the field, they just think that he can be brought into the lockerroom, and with his holy powers, he can bring them together as a team and get rid of the fighting. I think they might get a better deal bringing in a witch doctor or voodoo priest to try and bring peace to that lockerroom.

Tebow won't be coming to the Jets to start, he would be going there as a gadget QB/backup.I have heard that the reason the Jets want him is because they think he can bring the lockerroom together

Drew Stafford? Balls?I think you answered your own question. We could really make this into a fun game, Try and Guess what Lindy said, ending with Stafford Saying "I Know, I Know"

You know, I have always liked Chimps

Vancouver took Boston to 7 games last year and almost won. If it wasn't for poor play from a grossly overpaid goaltender, and Vezina worthy goaltending on the other side from Thomas, they could have won it. Was Carolina considered a very physical team similar to the Bruins?The penguins? The Lightning? The Ducks (aside from maybe Pronger)? Devils won it on defence and goaltending The Avalanche?

I think this is just another one of those "Theres only one way to build a team" myths that exist in all sports. The best way to build a team is always in teh exact same mould as the team that just won the championship the year before. If Vancouver had won (which they came close to doing without being known as a tough and physical team), there would be talks about how teams need tkilled players who can out skate the bigger, tough guys. Boston wins so its all about having big, tough guys who play physical and try to outplay you and beat you up. Its all about Balance and having the best players you can get playing at every position. Theres no right or wrong way to build a team

well, according to Lindy this morning on the radio, he feels that Ennis has found a home as a Centre The guys on the radio after the interview said that he reminds them of Briere (not a comparisson, just that he reminds them of him), although one said he reminds (again not comparison) to Gretzky (He looks like he tries to play a style similar to gretzky, not that they think he will be like him) I don't know why people are down on Gerbe in here. The guy is one of the only ones on the team that plays with over 100% effort every night and plays well. He might not have the numbers yet to show for it, but he has shown signs of being able to produce in the NHL regardless of his size.

I really can't hate the Giants. I know they beat the Bills in their first Super Bowl over 20 years ago (I really do wisah that the TV announcers would give Norwood and the missed FG a rest though), but it was a close game that came down to a missed FG to win, I can't hate another team for winning such a close game when the Bills had the chance to win it at the end. Redskins and Cowboys on the other hands, those were embarrassing beat downs that stung a little more As for the Pats, being a division rival, and one that has embarrassed the Bills many times over the last decade, I could never cheer for them Divison rival (Pats, Jets, Dolphins) trumps losing in the Super Bowl 20 years ago +/- (Giants, 'Skins, Cowgirls)

Do you really think Vin Diesel would make a really good Hockey Player? He might draw in a larger female crowd to games, and I'm sure his hockey playing skills have to be better then his acting abilities........

You won't get Kane for just Pomminstein, maybe for Vanek or Myers straight up Kane was a #1 overall pick and younger then Pomminstein, he has also been a better player in his short career then Pomminstein. A little slump he is in now will not have the 'Hawks trading him for just anyone

Thats what I figured, just wasn't 100% sure. I knew they had to pay the out the remainder of the contract. And someone would definitly claim him on re-entry waivers. Theres also a very good chance that a team with cap space would claim him on waivers just to take a chance on the whole "change of scenery" idea.

Sorry, meant to say the oilers might have to throw in a pick (Probably a 3rd or later) to sweeten the deal. If you are Edmonton, you are getting a player who has potential and may just need a change of scenery to get back his production from last year and they get to dump Hemsky. The advantage for the Sabres taking Hemsky back is that they get him for a few months to see if he can be a better replacement for Stafford and re-sign him this offseason, or they let him walk and save over $4mil in cap space for next season. If you send Drew down to the minors, you get nothing in return, still have to pay him out his contract, AND is there not still a partial cap hit they would face?

But they are getting a player that might just need a change of scenery and they can control for a few more seasons. Buffalo is helping them out by clearing cap space for a guy they would lose at the end of the year for nothing. Basically the Sabres are doing them a favour giving them stafford for Cap relief this offseason. If they truly want Stafford to upgrade their team, they may have to give up a pick and Hemsky to sweeten the deal for Buffalo. It may not be for a pick, but it gives them cap space this offseason for taking Hemsky til the end of the season. No one is saying Hemsky would be part of the rebuild

Atleast we know your sarcasim detector is functioning properly As for Hemsky, theres that chance that the change in scenery helps him, same thing the Oilers would be thinking about Stafford. The Sbres might have to sweeten the deal because Hemsky becomes a UFA at the end of the year so the deals basically a salary dump for the Sabres.

Stafford for Hemsky straight up, get'r done Darcy! Solves 2 problems, Sabres get rid of Stafford to a place where he has family and is possibly wanted, Edmonton gets rid of a player they are looking to deal It doesn't get Buffalo another C, but it does get Stafford out of here

Isn't that pretty close to Edmonton? This is my problem with trading these underachieving guys away, many of the buyers that might make a deal to try and get one fo these players are probably better teams that are gonna make the playoffs. I would really hate to see guys like Roy and Stafford get a pass and leave here, only to go on to better teams and play in the playoffs while the Sabres miss out. I would rather see them end up on worse teams with less chances for success. But I guess at the moment that might limit trading partners to the Blue Jackets only. Would they be interested in a Roy and Stafford for Nash deal?

In other words "They discussed it with me, and I will judge it on a case to case basis, making my ruling based on the player and team they play for"

Who is now waiting for Shanny to call in Miller and suspend him 4 games for making those comments about Lucic after the game?

New Face, same BS He looked good at first cause he seemed like he was out to take away dangerous hits, talking about how players still have to be responsible out there when making hits, yet here (when its time to discipline a Bruin)he is satisfied by the answer he gets from that player that he didn't mean to hit him

Would they have time between playing fashion show in Roys closet?

Couldn't this be said about any cheap shot into the boards too? "Its not player X's responsibility to protect player Y when he has his back turned and head down by the boards" it is everyones responsibility to protect all the players on the ice when they are out there. They are all human beings with lives and families outside the rink trying to make a living playing the game. You can't be out there trying to hit someone and end careers, unless you want someone else to do that to you.

He got close to Thomas, but as Jeanerett said, he just came back from 4 games off, unless he wants to be the new record holder for leagues longest suspension, he can't breathe on anyone too hard without risking it

But why? The Grad student was the one who actually witnessed the act. it becomes heresay from anyone else he tells because they can only go by what they are told by the grad student. my point is, where is the level where the person reporting it is no longer responsible once they report it to someone higher?

- The Grad student is getting the free pass because he reported it to Paterno. - Paterno has a Linch Mob after him because he reported it to his superior, who didn't do anything about it (allegedly) and he didn't follow up on it So why is no one going after this grad student for not doing more? If anything, the NCAA should be banning the entire program if its proved that the school covered up multiple occasions of this happening