Sabel79

This is amazing. I'd enjoy a tape deck and a spare couple weeks to go through this...

Sounds an awful lot like Michael Peca, but he'd only be a top-two point producer in the dead-puck era from whence he came...

Serious question: can we either 1. Agree to table all the unproductive keening over the Laffs or 2. Dedicate a thread for it so those of us not wishing to bash our heads against that wall can avoid it?

Four games in: would benefit from some time in Rochester. Let's see what's Nylander can do.

Intellectually I understand this and agree with you, but man, I'm dreading this road trip.

He sucks and should be nowhere hear this team, but no.

Risto needs to be rebooted.

What in the world?

Unfortunately, yes. KO pushed the goalie's pad, and therefore the puck, into the net.

I think McCabe is a problem, you guys..,

Oh look, Zadorov doing something dirty...

I seen what you did there.

Sigh.

Jack doing Jack things. Watch them waive this off.

Me: laughing as the third goal goes in. My Daughter (7): What's funny? Me: They're sooooo bad. Her: do you think you could do better? Life lesson learned...

He did trip,the dude for the second pp...

Is this last season?

Let's not let facts get in the way of my grudge.

Really good thing Larsson went into the lineup to "improve the penalty kill."

Everybody on this team not named Carter Hutton needs to wake up.

But...but...but... it was on the internet...

Click through, you'll go to the thread.

I have to think (and hope) Larsson getting hurt is the only reason he didn’t get waived out of camp. Zemgus has been fine in a role he’s suited for, I like the new guy. Sorry Johan...

Speaking of neighborhood disputes: OH MY DEAR LORD THIS THEAD:

Agreed. My GF lives in a subdivision covered by one, and works from home a lot. She sent me a text one afternoon a few weeks ago that she had to go outside and help break up a fistfight between the neighbors on either side of her. Evidently Neighbor A took exception to Neighbor B's plans for a fence. Which were evidently approved by the HOA, but whatever. The entitlement... worry about your property. I can understand if there's something that comprises a health or safety risk, but that's why we have building codes and doing zoning laws. And even those cover far more than that just about everywhere. Your claim (unsupported by fact) that your property value will be negatively impacted by someone's wholly legal and unremarkable use of thier own property.