Eleven

This wouldn't surprise me one bit. As soon as this thing hit I called my parents and asked them to check with me before making any big changes like putting all of their portfolio into gold or something like that. You just know people are going to prey upon the elderly.

I guess he didn't look quite as bad to me as he did to you two!

I think that's bad news on Larsson but I also think you're right. Would you not want Simmonds at the price GA suggested? $2.5 for a vet presence isn't bad.

Google search for "NYSE" (I wanted to see how the market in general did, not just DJIA or S&P) gave me visiting hours and peak visiting times. Umm, I don't think so.

New England fans are sooooooo soft: https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/patriots/patriots-fans-roasted-espn-over-first-take-poll-omitting-tom-brady And they even have a special "Tom Brady" tab at the top for a guy who isn't even their QB anymore!

I'd do that.

What do you think Simmonds will sign for?

I like a lot of this thinking. I'd rather keep Girgensons and Larsson together though. I don't know what Simmonds will cost, but if it's anything near $5M, I don't want to pay that to replace Okposo on the checking line.

The treatment was touted in "the media" piece that nfreeman posted--the one that started this very discussion! I've read hopeful articles about what the French are doing on numerous different sites for a week now. That is "the media." The fact is, you can't point to any "active campaign" by "the media" (whatever you mean by that) to prevent the treatment from being widespread, and you can't point to any data that "the media" (again) receives 1/2 of its revenue from pharmaceutical sales, either. You're inventing a conspiracy theory where there is no support for that theory. Do you not see that this is dangerous disinformation?

In The Athletic today, Joe Yerdon sets forth his case for the Sabres to do the following: 1. Keep Larsson and Vesey. 2. Let go Girgensons, Frolik, Simmonds, Wilson, and Sobotka. 3. Pursue FAs Craig Smith, Maroon, and Toffoli. What do we think?

I did read the article, and it does not factually support any assertion that "the media is in an active campaign to prevent this $20/person treatment from being widespread." Do you have data showing that "half the ads shown are pharma?" Or even 40%? I don't think you can factually support any of those three statements that you presented as fact.

"They" removed a post and suspended him; that is correct. So he has not been banned from twitter, which is what you wrote. Now, onto the other two, do you have factual support for either of these? 1. But the media is in an active campaign to prevent this $20/person treatment from being widespread. 2. The media who makes 1/2 of their revenue from pharmaceutical ads.

Can you back up any of these three statements? Giuliani remains active on twitter, so I know that one is wrong. How about the other two?

Just realized it was in the Southern District and not here; I'm not going to know the person anyway.

Who was the trustee?

I don't know about the television rights situation (and I am eager to find out what's going on with that), but Golisano purchased the team in 2003, before the lockout.

A friend's SIL now has it and is at Buffalo General. Strict no visitor policy, not even her husband (my friend's brother). That would make me crazy if I were her spouse.

Good point. So am I.

Ovechkin looks like a young woman in that photo.

I got it from a tractor.

Usually the hand sanitizer in the environments I mentioned are in hands-free dispensers. The small bottle that I keep in a backpack or briefcase or whatever is for emergencies and/or any time spent in NYC.

Yeah, hand sanitizer is for when you can't easily get to soap and water, or for "quick hits" at a mall, courthouse, airport, etc., even in normal times. I can't think of a situation where I'd have ready access to Listerine (which I do not think is high enough in alcohol content anyway) or high-proof spirits but not soap and water.

I guess so? I care more whether she gives me the right prescription. I don't tend to flirt with my pharmacist. I mean, if she's attractive to me and I run into her somewhere else, maybe? But not while she is doing her job.

Why? Not even close to the point.

I booked a haircut as soon as the NYS ban was announced. I'm happy that I did, even though I have no one to look good for. Still, I FELT better. I worry that these shutdowns don't consider our psychological needs. And I don't meant haircuts. I mean, talking with people. Seeing people. When my most important social contact is the woman at the prescription counter at Rite-Aid, that's not good for anyone. It's the same as seeing the haircut person.