Neo

OH, WHAT A GREAT IDEA .... Man, this sport is really innovative. I'm really looking forward to slow motion micrometers and assemblies with finger pointing and debate. Not to mention the four minutes of doing nothing and delaying the joy of your team taking a lead.

Who called Larson? I saw it, I saw it.

Detroit's surrendered third period leads 8 times in their last 11 games. Detroit feed ...

Goal! R O R!

Saw a game in The Joe, once. Took my son to see Dom's first game against Buffalo after he left the Sabres. Great crowd. Knowledgeable and loud. Old school feel despite a 20,000 seating capacity. Tight corner seats - the kind you have to crawl over people to get in and out of. Think meat and potatoes and lunch pails. Suits, too. Muffy with lungs and an edge. No fancy lights or cavernous food courts with plasmas and lounge areas. I loved it.

I laughed ... "Someone called it!"

LoL, didn't someone call a blind Kane backhand pass into the slot?

Insight ...

You know, I was reading the Linus interview MODO translated and thinking about the comments on fattening foods in the US. NOTHIN's got NOTHIN on those pancakes .... I have a new last meal fantasy.

Man .... Can you believe?

Ok, 2 in 49

Sounds like a euphemism ...

I remember thinking "oh, yeah, he went to Detroit" as he stepped to center ice for the shootout. Didn't notice him all game.

Interesting ... Brad Richards 1 goal, 48 shots

Sometimes there is so much beauty in the world ..... I feel like I can't take it - like my heart is just going to cave in. Ricky Fitts MODO - awesome. Merry Christmas. pA, you nailed it.

Doc, I re-wound that at the time it happened. Yes, sir, I do remember. He created his own space. Welcome aboard.

It IS the moonwalking bear video. I missed the climb until your post sent me back. Brains are amazing.

Left winger? I had to, I had to. I'll stop short of your conclusion because I don't apply rules to anyone but me, unwritten or otherwise. However, we share a common personal guideline. Common ground .....

LOL, last night's "3-1 OT win" has me spooked. CBS sports line showed Philly up 22-20 after we started near our goaline. I scoured SS, Twitter, TBD looking for the safety before the score reverted.

I have a "Legend of Kiko" vibe going on. I like it.

Rakish - Awesome and thank you. The idea of a point in time and change is very cool. My memory tells me you explained your system to us some time ago. Am I correct? If so, can you point me to the post or copy it here? I'll search, too. My interwebs skills!

Ha! Like we'd tell YOU.

Our views are often different. I come here to learn yours. You're the future. I had a day to think before I achieved "thorough"!

Just like climate change deniers! Ooops, (duck). My interest is language, for the record. Wanna make sure persuading someone to your point of view is made more difficult and less likely? Make an ad hominem remark calling him/her a denier. And yes, there are examples on the right and left, you bleeding heart, kumbaya singing mush melons. (I made mush melons up). Not you, Hoss, my good Jimmy Olson ... not you! We've and D4rk ... I still owe you thoughts on assumption of risk, the price we pay, and policy. My Strunk and White attribution error made me "posting" gun shy .... no ironic use of that phrase intended (what a beautiful world - the joy of small and ironic juxtapositions). Further to language and my ears. I think "The President" is most likely always respectful, disagree or not, and "This President" may or may not be, depending on what follows. There's a different emphasis. Both can be appropriate and the speaker's distinction is likely deliberate. My ears also hear "Bush" as often as "Obama". Either's less respectful than "President Smith", but not necessarily disrespectful. Obama leads fight for health care. Bush cuts taxes. Same thing to me. President Clinton leads welfare reform. More respectful. This President ..... well, let's see what follows.

Are we having a non sequitur moment? I replied to a post about morality being linked to, or limited to, or sourced in, religion and/or Christianity. The gist of two posts, as I understood them, was that you don't have to be religious or Christian to be a good person or moral. To that I'll say "of course you don't". I hope no one challenged that. The gist of the third was that it bore repeating here. Maybe I missed a challenge. To your question: I am a Christian. Hell is part of Christianity. I have no view on who is condemned to hell or who isn't. That would be above my pay grade.