...

What happened to Bogo?

I took some pics, will post tomorrow if there's interest.

Is Neil seriously still playing?

You're the Candy Man!

Seriously just put on the 15, Jack.

Help a brother out, the kodi stream isn't working tonight.

Clearly, she's a betting gal.

Again, risking legal retribution for the sake of clarification, I submit that it has been stated in the media more than once Big E represented the accuser because he knows the family. I think that might explain why the mother, at least, seemed to be party to his advisement.

Wait, did Toronto get 2 time outs this period?

These preseason games are definitely making me hot for the opening line up. I'm not buying the questionable defense narrative I keep hearing and reading.

Looks like our PP has increased its potency this year.

Sorry, not sitting with the iPod, so I'm popping in on the big 'puter...but I'm liking McCabe. And that O'Reilly guy, he's pretty good.

I've been messing around with Kodi, and learned just this evening that with the Phoenix add on you can get streams as well, without all of the virus-addled freaky sites. Would take you about 10 minutes to install from scratch if you don't have Kodi, yet.

Free? Because I just started to look.

Eoannou referred to the accuser in the bag press conference as "my client", if that helps your discussion. Just an innocent bystander here interjecting, don't sue me.

It's been over 24 hours since this was confirmed by Cambria, and longer since the original leak/rumour manifested. If it weren't true, you can bet Eoannou would have been all over it only because it would influence a potential jury. Even the DA might interject if it weren't accurate because of the potential damage to the case it could lay. It's a big deal if this is to become a jury trial. Also, Eoannou, was definitely representing the accuser. He went before the world speaking on behalf of the accuser. From WGRZ: "From the statements Mr. Eoannou made tonight," Cambria said, "somebody attempted to use him to fabricate or obstruct and undermine the science. He obviously now has made a clear statement that, ethically, he had to withdraw. To me that means, and I think logically it means, that the integrity of the accusations has been completely undermined."

I haven't gone there, but the "other males' DNA" found inside her, while Kane's was not; a lying mother; and a high-profile lawyer quitting because of, essentially, integrity issues, are not painting a pretty picture of a lily-white doe.

I think it was Cambria who said it outright yesterday. I think he said two other males.

That makes sense. She likely went home in scrubs, and whatever wasn't considered evidence at the time was put in an "extra" evidence bag for her to take with her.

Well, let's organize the events of the past week or so: Grand Jury is delayed for unknown reasons. A leak says Kane's DNA not found in vital/critical areas of accuser - although other males' DNA was. Allegation that the evidence bag (but not the evidence) was found at accuser's mother's home. Kane's lawyer confirms above stated leak (re: DNA); accuser's lawyer does not dispute it. Accuser's lawyer holds press conference to declare he has quit the case because he is uncomfortable with information coming from the accuser's side. I can see nothing that works against Kane here.

It's because the aliens are finally on their way. Finally.

Didn't watch the presser, but maybe he meant to say the bag is the exact kind of bag (and tape) used by ECMC to seal rape kits, therefore making it legit, but is not commenting on whether it's THE bag used to the seal THE evidence from THIS case.

WTF, it was really difficult orienting myself to this team during the first. So many newbies. Samson has grown up, but, I don't get his line. He needs finishers, and he really wasn't teamed with finishers. Nice to see a player who can make a puck hit the inside of the net from beyond the circles, but 90 and 9 did disappoint during the 3 on 3. I will defer to those at the game who thought Lehner played okay, but, that second period was brutal for him. Perhaps it's not fair to evaluate him based on the awful D for this game, but, I'd like to not use that excuse for the "new" Sabres. Can we not use the D as an excuse for the goalies going forward? I want to know how is it we don't have Matt O'Conner on our team. He was great.

For my money, knowing what "Skynet" means is actually somewhat important on 2015 Earth.

Ewww.