tom webster

They will just put Savard on LTIR and may have to do some minor tinkering. When will people stop expecting these teams to end up in cap problems. the big boys just work their way out of them.

Iginla to Bruins

One of your "sources" probably has just reported that after reading your post!

If Biega was 6'3" he would be on the Sabres

Wish I could remember who said I was crazy when I said Clowe would end up near $5 million per

You are mixing up eras. Sanderson and Plante never played with Drury and Briere.

Jake McCabe is becoming the "Next One" on this board. I haven't seen him rated as highly anywhere but this board. He is a decent prospect who still may develop into a top pairing guy, but right now the betting money is against it.

Not one successful organization I know drafts for need, especially when talking about two or three years fr now. Who knows what they will need then ?

I know it's late notice but anyone looking for something to do, there is a comedy show at the Elks Lodge in Niagara Falls featuring Greg Bauch, Dan Fisher and Rick Matthews. Proceeds benefit the Wounded Warriors. Tickets are $10, buffet is $8.00 and drinks are pretty inexpensive. Food starts at 6, show starts at 8:00.

The contract wouldn't take effect till next year and already Stan Bowman is predicting a $75 million cap in 2014/2015.

Not sure about the date and if compliance but outs are subject to waivers but if a player is picked up on waivers I would assume the new team would have to honor original contract

I guess that is what you said. Sorry, I was in the middle of something earlier and it didn't seem as clear as it does now

The big difference is that the team originally trading the player can't sign the player. It was laways understood that the team trading for the player couldn't resign him. What they are stopping is say Tampa trading Vinny to Buffalo so that Buffalo can buy him out and then Tampa can resigning him.

It's really another example of how fluid the new CBA is. It's no wonder teams are confused as they seem to make it up as they go

Per Larry Brooks, teams will not be allowed to trade players in order to have the other team buy them out and the original team re-sign players at a more cap friendly contract

He had a "procedure." No timetable given but he is still re-habbing

For the umpteenth tme, they cannot buy Leino out while he is rehabbing and the buy out period only lasts 48 hours after Cup is over.

That is exactly what is going on. I said it before, they think their biggest mistake to date was promising too much. They are now in the promise less, deliver more stage of their business.

Yes, but they would have traded him to a team that would have made him their third string goalie if they got a better offer. There is a difference between Boston giving Bourque a chance at a Cup and LA going out of their way to accommodate a well paid back up still earning his stripes in the league. I don't know about the offer sheet part, but this makes the most sense. Some respected analyst aren't even sure how much of an upgrade it is.

No way they moved him for less then what they could have got just to be nice. Lombardo and Sutter aren't built that way.

You don't really mean this, do you?

Flyers were one of worst teams in league year prior to him signing there and Montreal just missed playoffs. He didn't want the pressure or the taxes of playing in Montreal at the time. Now that he is older, maybe but I doubt it

Montreal offered more then Philly offered originally and he chose Philly.

NOt looking to pile on but when I click the rankings tab it comes up with spring rankings dated 4/2/2013.

I'm all for free enterprise and healthy competition but no matter what the business, it's never considered a good idea to rail against the competition, especially not the leader in the field. Build your own site and make it work on its own merit. Just my personal opinion.