PASabreFan

Can KA spend to the cap? What's his timeline for contending and are we considering the horrifying possibility that Casey at 25 doesn't fit in the timeline?

Dear... The glasses help you see up close. I told you that. Take a close look at the Senators logo and enjoy the ham salad in the fridge. See you after the game! Dodo

George, use the glasses I got for you at Maple Aid! Love Dodo

I just jammed my sweaty junk between my legs and am heading for the port side lifeboat. Take my hand!

I was. A good pickup on your part. And entirely plausible. Next up: Wawrow.

The French Press Agency?

Don't blame Quint one bit.

Now inky. As Bill Burr points out, women are finished products of perfection. You best be working on YOU. How have we as faltering fans failed our flailing franchise?

Nobody reads Weave anymore, he's getting too many views.

And to answer the question, yes, I can like a team with Dahlin on it. The biggest problem I probably have is that Dahlin's talent is lost in a moribund franchise, and none of his brilliance has ever been seen in the context of a truly meaningful moment.

You misread. Probably bad writing on my part. My point was that the team will necessarily be different next year, even if all of the players return. I might like that team, especially if a lot of the same guys are having better seasons. Now my head hurts. I don't think Rasmus is Dumb™ has been my narrative. There was a thread, sure. But yeah nothing about him screams brainpower to me. The team is trying to market him, but there's nothing there. Which is fine. He's talented and makes good plays. He's one of the core. I don't see him as someone you build around. Captain? I wouldn't understand that decision in the least.

Wonder if Budweiser advertised on it. Maybe the Clydesdale lowered its head in shame after walking past some teens who were passing around a doobie.

Uh oh. Dad's home. Put the Tide Pods and Sears Roebuck catalog away.

I won't stop you.

Top 10 teams are in the lottery. Incentivize trying to win.

Next up: my thread title. I'm not sure you reassemble a train after it derails.

The children is not being educated?

What class? It's IKP. I am sorry your opinion was attacked by a few. The fact it was only a few and there was no reasonable rebuttal is telling. A careful reading of your post could have led to a respectful debate. Hockey is for everyone, but not all hockey games are. Your safety point is one worth thinking about. Unreasonable? Would you let your eight year old (son or daughter) play in a men's adult league? If not why not? Would it detract from the enjoyment? Would it be unsafe? Of course. Now let's put pi (or a pi when he was younger and tearing it up) into a women's adult league. Do his 9 goals in the first period detract from the enjoyment? Is it an issue with the women?

The original: Just think of all the games in hand we’ll have to not make up any ground with. Yours? (It's not like there's any Sabres hockey to talk about. Thanks, NHL. Thanks, Terry.) Mine: Just think of all the games in hand we’ll piss away.

For anyone willing to read it six times, there's a gem to be had.

Never mind.

And that's Ginnie from Elma. She's great. She also tells her teenage granddaughter who flunked an algebra test, It's OK hunny you tried.

You missed a very big exception of.

The culture of losing. No reason to be negative, the fierce warrior Ras says. DOMINATED THE STARS raves the Olean Times Herald. We shoulda won, says SabreSpace. I don't get it. If the Bills get in the red zone eight times and come away with one touchdown and lose by two points, no one on the Bills and no one in Bills organized crime is happy. Allen would light himself on fire in the mud lot. The opposing D would not be praised. We wouldn't have gotten "goal lined." Kudos to Channel 4 of all places. SABRES FIND NEW WAY TO LOSE

Entity is the key word. Shame on me for asking a nuanced question. Sabres good! Me like! I can't go that far. The rafters in the arena could easily boast four Cup banners.