Taro T

It probably is a big part of it. But, yeah, they can't sustain hiding Bryson and Olofsson and ... the entire year. Hate that the next game is Carolina because they are the good team that the Sabres match up worst against. Give Levi the start and hope he can stop enough to let them sneak out a victory down there.

Well, that's kind of the point. When Bryson is in, the good D get more ice time. And more good things happen. 😉

Yes, and no. It was a cluster of a game but a W. Still would like to have seen how that 2nd game would've played out had the 1st 6 minutes not seen them give up 2 goals on 2 shots and lose their best defensive D-man (no, not getting into an argument over whether Johnson is better in his own zone than Samuelsson because Muel plays 50% more than EJ does). That's one heck of a gut punch to start.

There are a lot of legit criticisms of Granato, but it can never be said that they carry a bad game into the next one nor that they're intimidated at the thought of facing a team that can be one of the top regular season teams.

Yep, and very nice to see Dahlin immediately go retrieve the puck for him.

You know what set that up? For the 1st time this entire ####ing season, Power DIDN'T DROP THE PASS BACK ####ing up the entry. They got into the zone clean, recovered the 1st missed opportunity and then Power made a nice pass to Peterka and Okposo had a great screen set up in front. Praise the Lord, Power didn't do that stupid mother ####ing drop pass. (Believe it was because he was over along the boards and it really wasn't an option; but don't care WHY he didn't drop it back. He DIDN'T drop it back and the unit scored!)

Welcome back!

7 days minimum.

Absolutely no way they brought him up just to watch an NHL game from the press box. Bryson may have FINALLY entered Olofsson territory in the grand scheme of things. So, maybe something good came out of this H&H set. Rhetorical, right?

Doubt it is. But it should definitely be considered if not actually enacted. Should they miss the playoffs, expect it'll be an assistant or 2 that take the fall with Granato on a very short leash and Adams suddenly not in position to have a job for life with this or-gan-i-zay-shun. (Still say at a minimum they should've brought somebody else in to run the PP this past off-season. Hoping the reason it wasn't done isn't because that would move up the timeline on the rest of these possibilities.)

Well, considering that now with Anderson retired, you ARE older than every single player on the team, can understand how that's just now sinking in for you. 😉 Belated welcome to the club. 😛 The next big "milestone" in that regard is your kids no longer being draft eligible. 😲

Can't see any scenario where he walks away a week from Wednesday. But, getting spelled a few games, can see that happen. (Probably would only be 1 every 9 or 10 games; and personally would prefer it to be 1 every 2 or 3.)

The '86 Habs were built primarily through the kids all coming up at the same time too. There were players on that team that had come via trade, but the ones that pushed them all over the top had been in the AHL the prior year. And, the point of both of these is, the claim was "nobody" had ever done it. Not saying that it's a common occurance; merely that it can and has happened. And, with all the high end talent that had been accumulated over the prior 6 years, that got converted into current assets and futures, this team has an unusually large influx of higher end talent that is all pretty much at the same age. IF it is possible to "draft your way to the top" so to speak, this is the scenario where it would be possible. And you and I are on the same page on that issue. If they miss the playoffs this year (they won't, but if they do), change needs to happen.

But those weren't "sudden" firings and those were very much due to incompetance. The exception taken to your post was the "sudden" part, implying they were made impulsively. Forgot LaFontaine, but am certain there was more to that departure than we've been made aware of. Except for LaLa (which again, there's more to that story than we know about), ALL the firings were due to pure incompetence, were well warranted, and any other management was onboard with. Can't see Adams getting on board with punting Granato before the end of this season at the absolute earliest and likely after 1 more unsuccessful season (should those in fact happen).

You sure about that? What big FAs / Trades did the 80's Eulers make to get that team rolling? Almost all that talent that was there when they joined the NHL was augmented by guys they drafted over the next 4 years. Anderson, Kurri, Messier, Coffee, Fuhr - all added through the draft.

So which female intern are you having throw herself at Granato to make that happen? Except for the relieving of Botterill of his duties for refusing to can the majority of the hockey department staff, can't think of an other "sudden" firing that wasn't precipitated by a bit of hanky panky. (Didn't even the Racconia (sp?) departure have that same undertone?)

Was fine with bringing Girgensons back. Still am. He is exactly what he always has been. Defensively responsible (on a very irresponsible team), doesn't fight but does forecheck hard and will throw hits (on a team that doesn't do much of even that) that will chip in 10 or so goals while helping to keep the other team bottled up in its own end more often than not. Though we seem to be watching a 4 one-way offensive line team being built; league history says you need at least 1 defensively responsible line to keep the other team honest. Still expect that if the 4RW could skate better, that line would look a LOT better.

The 2nd valid criticism of Adams is that much like Regier couldn't adjust a plan after it was made (wtf didn't they re-sign Zubrus after the 1AC and the 1BC both walked?), nor would Botterill (wtf didn't he use Berglund's money on a player that would help that team after he caught the break and he walked away from the team?) there doesn't seem to be a significant adjustment to the "plan" when conditions on the ground indicate that something that was expected and planned for isn't happening. (Quinn would be a huge piece of what they're doing were he healthy. They knew months ago that he won't be until December at the earliest.) Like Adams and do believe he's building something special here. But there are times it's frustrating to be a fan of this team. Btw, still say this team will make the playoffs.

One problem (several actually, but one will suffice for now) that was very foreseeable was bringing Okposo back. Completely understand why they did it - he's been a very good soldier, is a leader on the team, and he & management both wanted very much for him to be a part of the team that finally makes it back to the playoffs after so many years in the desert, and he was only about 16 games shy of 1k NHL games. But he had clearly lost a step by the end of last season and there was no reason to believe he'd be good for more than about 20 games this year before he was completely spent. Visions of Pominville's last season were clear all over this re-signing. Getting absolutely nothing out of the 4th line (Girgenson's 2 goals not withstanding) this year is not helping them move towards the goal of playoffs. Don't know how they fix this short of Kyle suffering (wink wink) an injury that puts him on IR for about 5 months, gives them opportunity to trade for what they should've brought in or at a minimum keeps Jost or Rousek in the lineup in his spot, and lets him come back to triumphantly play 8 minutes in their 1st playoff game before reinjuring (wink wink) himself again. Would really like to see if having 2 viable wingers rather than just 1 would bring Krebs game at least back to what it was last year. Not sure how many games he had prior to last year; don't believe this is officially his 2nd season, but it is his 2nd as a full time regular; and his sophomore slump is worse than Power's is.

To the bolded, we absolutely are in agreement.

Which is why they'll win tonight. But, isn't that supposed to be a big part of their drafting seemingly (not really, but it sure seems that way) only highly skilled undersized forwards? You draft what you're good at identifying and then trade some of that for what you need - grit. They've made 2 trades in that style (Greenway and Stillman) but they need more of it. Would like to see them make another trade for another Greenway and start dressing him in Okposo's slot after the Bruins game. (Know it isn't going to happen; but one can dream, right?)

Really wanted Levi to get the start last night. Knew it wouldn't happen, but still, wanted it to. Last season, they played Anderson (their obvious #1) in 5 games against bottom feeders and they went 0-4-1 in those 5 with Anderson giving up either a bad goal to start the game (the typical scenario) or giving up a bad goal to start another period; each of which caused the bottom feeder to believe they could not just hang, but win. Those goals also seemed to deflate the Sabres. Unfortunately, that script played out again last night. (But, but, but, that 1st goal was a screen, UPL had no chance. Well, yes, he had no chance when he decided to lean hard to his right to see around the screen leaving the glove side of the net wide open. On the 2nd goal, yes, that would've been a very difficult save to make with Jokiharju effectively passing the puck to the Phlyer winger, but UPL didn't react until the shot had already been taken.) Even with that, UPL had a chance to raise the energy in the building and on his team by making a stop on the breakaway. Go off script and make that save and the game LITERALLY turns around. But no, he was completely flat footed, not moving at all by the time of the shot and got beat to the glove hand, again. Teams that aren't having things going right for them need the goalie to make a big stop, one that he "shouldn't be able to make" to get the momentum to shift for them. UPL too often doesn't make that stop. And, btw, that was the fifth consecutive game that UPL played in. Everybody was decrying how Levi playing 4 games in 8 days caused him to break. But UPL playing 5 straight over 11 days; hey, no biggie, he's the "hot hand." That game wasn't all on UPL. The skaters needed to pick it back up after getting put in a 2-0 hole. They can't stay in a funk the entire period. Wonder if Samuelsson going out only 6 minutes into the game on a rather innocuous play contributed to the sustained funk. (He and the Phlyer crashed into each other but as the Phlyer went down he inadverrtenly slew footed Muel and somehow another Sabre's stick got under him as well. He finished the shift, but was obviously laboring (only caught that on the replay, didn't notice it live).) This was another game that the Sabres managed to generate a lot of pressure in the 2nd with little (or in this case, nothing) to show for it. Would really like to see them simplify when they are flying at home and take the shot when they 1st get it rather than trying to maneuver into a better shot (Thompson is excused from this criticism, that and the slapper is his bread and butter) or making 2 more passes to get the clean open net 1 timer. They were playing a sieve; get shots from a little further out and let the goalie battle that; get guys to the net and clean up the bad rebound he's going to leave (providing he even makes the initial save. Don't know what Granato can do for Power. He's clearly in the "sophomore slump" and playing too much. When Samuelsson comes back, would move him to Power's pairing (playing with Jokiharju isn't working and Clifton is too similar in style to Henri to believe he'd help with the funk either). Wanted Owen to get a stay at home partner all off-season. He's now at a point where he needs it. Until Muel is back, would call Stillman back up and move Henri to Dahlin's pairing and put Stillman with Power. (Isn't ideal, but is better than overworking Johnson on the 2nd pairing.) Liked Peterka's effort but still don't know how he didn't score on that pass from Dahlin at the start of the 3rd. Score that goal, and MAYBE they manage to pull the comeback off. And will cut him slack on the bad pass that led to a goal against. He was flying all over the ice. And something just isn't right with Tuch. They keep saying he isn't injured, but that last goal likely doesn't happen if he's 100% because he couldn't go the full ice back after the turnover and that guy was the eventual goal scorer. Before this season, he would've broken that up. Could go on about what was wrong with last night, but no real point to it. (Vented enough.) The good thing is, Granato's squad doesn't dwell on the bad games and are usually ready to go after a true stinker. The bad thing is, likely no Samuelsson, and would really like to have him against a team with this much firepower. Hopefully, Levi is back to 100%. He could help them steal one.

1986. That team won the Stanley Cup. Had a whole bunch of rookies on it too.

Trick question, right?

Believe it is tickets distributed. It definitely was in the Rigas era. Golisano put an end to a massive comping of tickets. Honestly not sure what the current policy towards that is. Perhaps. But pretty sure those tix wouldn't have been comped, but sold at a discount from normal window prices in group sales. That's the way it's worked in the past. And next Friday's game will be the one where Highmark and Roswell Park use their comps from being "gold ring partners" or whatever it is they now call their major advertisers because it's "hockey fights cancer nightTM." Am guessing the rep was rounding up. 16.6 rounds to 17. And nearly all of those 16,612 tickets actually got used. The barn was reasonably full. Too bad the game was such a stinker.