-
Posts
35,701 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Taro T
-
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
Quinn drew blood. The 'Nuck didn't. -
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
Darn it Greenway. Guess we now get why Ruff is trying to not overtax you. -
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
Doan. (Dunleavy does make that name sound like Dunne though, doesn't he?) Edit: Well, nevermind. Thanks for the correction @Bangarang. -
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
It's almost like watching the Blue & Gold scrimmage. -
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
3 defenders decide to worry about McLeod behind the net leaving Dahlin widely alone in front. Does Wilford have a cousin working for the 'Nucks? -
GDT- Buffalo Sabres @ Vancouver Canucks Dec 11 2025 10pm ESPN, WGR
Taro T replied to Shoot da Puck's topic in The Aud Club
Illness and he "tweaked something" in the pregame warmups in Edmonton. -
That's not a resolution. That's a respite.
-
Nah, that would be signing Kuntar. The Buffalo boy signing the Buffalo boy as his last official act. Poetic. 😉
-
Not when they are part and parcel of the same thing. He wanted Eichel gone (probably was mean to him in the hallways) and he wanted the long form rebuild. And keeping Eichel didn't fit in with a long form rebuild.
-
He's 69 and has been out of the game for ~10 years. Guessing that ain't happenin'. 😉
-
He meant he'd be following the course the owner had asked him to follow but that it would bring much short term pain with it. One thing that Regier always did was work within whatever constraints his boss(es) put on him. The owners asked for the worst team in the league for 2 years to have the best chance at landing McDavid and being guaranteed the consolation prize of Eichel. He did their bidding. At least until they saw the results of what they'd actually signed on for and then canned him. And personally, find telling the paying customers of a business that is SUPPOSED to be entertaining that they will be suffering is absolute garbage. He should never have agreed to that. IMHO his agreeing to that pretty much ended his career in the NHL. He was an AGM for the Coyotes for a year or 2 after Buffalo and hasn't been heard from since. This being a guy who's teams won 1 Wales Conference Trophy a Presidents Trophy and had 4 trips to the Conference Finals.
-
Adams brought in Hall & Staal because Krueger and Pegula wanted one more go with an Eichel-centric team. Adams did not want that. He wanted to alter the direction from day one. @Thorny explains it pretty well in his reply.
-
IF the team really is close to removing Adams of GM duties, would like the 3 headed goalie monster to remain for 1-3 more weeks - however long it is until Pegula plans on pulling the trigger on Adams removal. If they AREN'T close to removing him; then yes, get what you can for UPL today and move on.
-
Would clarify that further by adding it was his wanting Eichel out even before he took over as the GM.
-
Care to explain the seeming incongruity between Regier was NOT canned for being too good at executing the plan to clearly be awful AND Darcy never having a prayer? Recall, that when Pegula 1st bought the team money was no object and if they couldn't land Nash they'd at least land Leino. The Pitts Peeps weren't always onboard the train to Tankville. That was their 1st pivot. And apparently Regier was very good at driving that train.
-
You remember all the Pitt people telling Pegula to tank, but beleive they somehow weren't behind getting Regier punted when he was too good at it. Murray walked the fine line of being JUST bad enough that next year to finish dead last, and keep the team watchable. He did exactly what they wanted that next year. And, btw, IF Regier was doing exactly what ownership & advisors wanted, why fire Rolston too when giving Regier his "golden parachute?"
-
It was beyond awful. If they didn't dump Rolston there would've been a mass revolt. They were 4-15-1 and they weren't as good as the record indicated. It was flat out unwatchable. They couldn't get the puck out of their own end. Nolan got them to at least play hockey. And even though they did they still finished about 20 points out of 2nd last place in the league.
-
True. He envisioned Ottawa Senators expansion team levels of horrible play, thus his hiring Rolston to help get them there. But he kept some good pieces to be building around after the 2 God awful seasons he expected to have, guys such as Miller. He would've kept most all those draft picks he'd accumulated and they would've been bad for a couple of years after the tank, but they would've been good soon thereafter. The problem with HIS version of tanking is the team was absolutely unwatchable under Rolston when he got to install HIS system right from training camp.
-
The bolded is why this kid is on the anti-Forton bandwagon. Pegula HAS to talk to people besides just Adams and SOMEBODY is telling him, yeah, you're right, Adams is a nice guy that has a good plan that will work if given enough time. Forton would seem to be that guy that Pegula trusts who's pumping Adams tires.
-
Bowman was the GM in St. Louis. And Regier didn't say there'd be suffering on his way out. He said it as he began the tank. BIG difference.
-
Maybe. But, they were going to play Ellis in TO but he had a stiff back so they went with UPL instead. And they gave him 3 consecutive starts and he spit the bit in that 3rd game. Have no idea what they're thinking on the goalie situation. For a short while there, they were in the give a guy the next game if he won the last one. Not sure if they're fully out of that or not, because they don't win often enough to tell. You would think that with all the experience they've had running a 3 headed monster the past few years that Bales would have an idea on how to run a 3 man rotation; but really don't get the impression that there is any plan there. Yeah, they're running with "the guy that gives them the best chance to win on any given night" but there really doesn't seem to be any obvious rationale as to how they're making that determination. And it also doesn't seem that they give any consideration to the possibility that letting a guy not play for 3 or so weeks will get him out of any rhythm he might've had and now he WON'T give them the best chance to win on the particular night that he MIGHT actually have been the one to give them the best chance to win that night.
-
Hope so. Diggs hasn't been particulary anything to write home about the last 4-5 games; but he'll have his A game on Sunday.
