All Activity
- Past hour
-
Was it 60%? I thought it was less but I'll take your word for it. Still, byrams stats crater away from Dahlin so is he good against top lines? Or is Dahlin?
-
Umm, you mean other than him being Dahlin's primary partner for about 60% of the season?
-
He’s WR5/6. He should bring something else to the table.
-
Samuel ran a 4.31 at his combine. Moore ran a 4.35. Not exactly a turtle.
-
Has to get a lot better at driving possession in favor of Buffalo. He's a #4 defender, and you want to pay him 7 mill or more a season. Also, Jokiharju was positive too, should we have kept him? You can keep Byram, but then power needs to go. Also you got any evidence at all that Byram played against other teams best?
-
A smaller slower Curtis Samuel. Hopefully he can be returner.
-
He'd already brought Moore in prior to the draft and they agreed they'd touch base again after the draft. So, Beane already knew he likely was adding Moore to the WR room. Still chalk it up to having to do an interview while being exhausted and hearing the discussion before he actually got on the air as rubbing him the wrong way. This is, what, his 8th year here, and ottomh this is the 1st time he's been accused of being defensive and dismissive in an interview. If it starts to happen consistently, will then possibly care about it.
-
I can assure you that Beanne has had this in the works before putting Jeremy in his place.
-
How would you retool this team this summer?
dudacek replied to GASabresIUFAN's topic in The Aud Club
He has to get a lot better to what? Earn a $50M contract? Agreed. To help the Sabres? He already does. Byram gave team a full season of 20+ minutes a night as a plus player against the other teams' best. I'm shocked at how many people seem to take that for granted. How many Sabres defencemen have done that over the past decade? Pretty sure there are 4, and people want to drive two of them to the nearest airport. The 3rd is Dahlin and the 4th is Brandon Montour, another skilled D this board stupidly wanted to get rid of. By all means, trade Byram. Just understand that even if you are replacing him with somebody different who can eat the same minutes, you still haven't made the team any better. -
That's because he didn't use a high draft pick on one. That was the criticism.
-
My only issue is that Samuel and Shakir are basically the same player but they are all talented. Maybe one of Samuel or Shenault can pop.
- Today
-
I definitely had Rossi over Quinn. That's who I wanted and would still make that pick today easy. I don't remember being all that aware of Jarvis. I liked Holloway then and still do today. If I was picking today, I would take Eklund over Power, but at the time I thought Power was the right pick in a draft lacking top-end talent. So far, he has not lived up to #1 pick expectations in any way, but again, I'm inclined to give him some grace because defensemen almost always take a while to get going. Hedman wasn't anything until year 5. Pietrangelo took 4-5 years. Yeah, there's guys that jump right in like Ekblad, Doughty, Makar; but it's not unusual for them to take a while to get there. My concern is this injury is going to set him back big because he really needed this summer to work on his game and get stronger. I just don't have a really bad taste about taking him because it was a weak draft for top-end talent and he seemed to have the most potential. Will Eklund or anyone else had been better? We need another year or two to probably know. Cossa over Rosen? Sure, but he's played 1 NHL game. No idea what he's gonna be. Can't argue one way or another there. Leinonen, give me Hutson there of course; other than him it's a crap shoot. It's a good debate. With hindsight, there are several different picks any of us would have made. Bottom line in the end is Adams sucks at his job. I just don't have HUGE issues with his drafting. Or not nearly as much as everything else he's done or failed to do. But I guess when drafting appears to be your "strength" and it's really been pretty "meh" we kind of arrive in the same place.
-
Also that burner with the unusual name — Shenault?
-
WR room is now … Shakir, Samuel, Palmer, Coleman, Moore … and someone like Shavers maybe?
-
But that would offend the league’s gambling overlords. That will never happen.
-
We’ll see what happens with the reshuffle
-
That's great! Makes Beane look more odd from the other day. Dude literally went and got a wr the same week he melted down about being asked about wr... weird. I like this signing. He's still young. He's cheap. Decent upside.
-
Everybody eats!
-
Booya…maybe
-
Friedman believes changes are coming to Sabres Front Office; UPL Available?
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
He doesn’t have inside info They sabres social media people don’t know anything -
Friedman believes changes are coming to Sabres Front Office; UPL Available?
inkman replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
-
Friedman believes changes are coming to Sabres Front Office; UPL Available?
Thorny replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Yet -
He's gotta to get a lot better. Also that's such an indictment of how terrible buffalo's defense is. Byram is a 4 at best right now and I don't see anything saying he'll ever be a 2. How long should we wait until he figures it? How much should we get he does. Everyone shouldn't be getting 7yr deals. It's stupid and it locks you into guys that are flawed. They need to move on from Power or Byram. Keeping both is bad team building.
-
I’m glad Beane takes a macro approach to managing the roster. Instead of pigeon holing a receiver into an immediate large role, when rookie receivers are notoriously slow starters and quite frankly bust at a high rate. They are most likely much higher on Coleman than I am. I am also fairly optimistic about Palmer. We’ve seen average receivers flourish under Josh and good receivers flounder. A room starting with Shakir, Palmer and Coleman is promising but we’ll see if it comes to fruition. I don’t think any of the WR outside of Travis Hunter are going to blossom in the NFL. At least not anytime soon.