... Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 52 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: They were just greedy SOBs with a huge tolerance for risk. Does that not sum up Sabres ownership perfectly? It does. Quote
Taro T Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago 44 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said: Good eye. But now I've re-read it a couple times. How do you see it both ways? I see it as a pile of mush. But I can't make it mean anything clear. Quote: we have a lot of things to work on at the Sabres - a “critical broadcast” is not one of them. Can take that as "we're ok with the broadcast being critical; it tends to be when appropriate and we're fine with that" OR "we don't need to work to make the broadcast critical; we need to work to make it non-critical - and we will put in the necessary work." 1 Quote
Night Train Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago If this somehow means replacing Dunleavy, I'm all for it. 1 Quote
Forecheck Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Night Train said: If this somehow means replacing Dunleavy, I'm all for it. No chance we get that lucky. I have this feeling he will be around another 30 years. The drought will also still be going by then most likely as well. 1 Quote
clink Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, Indabuff said: Dammit! That reverend in your profile pic always freaked me out as a kid and it still does! And he's animated! *****!!! Agreed He IS disturbing IMO Quote
That Aud Smell Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, Taro T said: Quote: we have a lot of things to work on at the Sabres - a “critical broadcast” is not one of them. Can take that as "we're ok with the broadcast being critical; it tends to be when appropriate and we're fine with that" OR "we don't need to work to make the broadcast critical; we need to work to make it non-critical - and we will put in the necessary work." excellent - thanks. also: nice job, pete. 1 Quote
Carmel Corn Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Maybe the guy they fired wanted to finally show SOG’s on the MSG broadcast….but the team felt that would be too critical. 🙃 Quote
gomper Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Sabres broadcast has always been bad, production wise. Those of us old enough, remember the 93 series with Boston, where they missed the handshake line. Completely. Quote
Stads Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 5 hours ago, That Aud Smell said: I'm torn between whether the franchise is a gong show or a clown show. There is a clown holding a giant gong 1 Quote
bunomatic Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago I suppose Rob Ray gets a happy sticker under this new plan. He’s the most non critical member of the crew. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.