That Aud Smell

There's something to this, though. The idea that Bylsma's vision/system had a high(er) floor and low ceiling of wins, success. The idea that Housley's vision/system has a low(er) floor and higher ceiling of wins, success. Now, mind you: I'm not sure whether Housley is capable of delivering on anything. But that was the idea, I think. It's not unlike a Bills fan saying they want to move on from 8 or 9 win teams and Tyrod Taylor, and see the team take a shot at becoming a team capable of hanging 11 or 12 wins. There are more risks associated with the latter path -- but more upside as well.

Then, like, what's even the point of a coach?

In theory: Bylsma’s ceiling may have been ~90 points. A better, more modern system would have no such ceiling. That’s the theory anyway.

What is life, even.

Wut.

I dunno, man. It feels like a guilty pleasure. Anyway, I frickin love those bits. I remember being bummed when I ordered a few seasons on DVD, only to find the music video segments had been omitted.

Bylsma: Small ice. Training wheels. Grind them b1tches down. Housley: Big ice. Sink or swim. SKATE. Move.

Well, if the idea is to debate (maybe it isn’t here?), then marshaling facts to support your take is ... a thing people do. Eichel gave a nod to Phil’s being personable and how he works on relationship building, back in September. Then, after a slow start, Eichel began a long stretch of his best play as a pro. Doesn’t *seem* like a tune-out scenario for #15.

Glad you seen what I did there.

Years gone by, I was a little bit on edge during a family vacation to Disney (that place is fun, but it has a way of doing that to a person), and I was just re-collecting myself after successfully getting me and several kids to our fast pass lane right before our tickets expired (for whatever the new "it" ride was), and this guy and his teenage daughter sally in behind us, they were there in plenty of time and were as breezy as you like. The guy looked like a less jolly John Candy - but not nearly as tall. Anyway, they're there for 3 or 4 seconds, and I'm admonishing one of my kids for something (probably antagonizing another one of the kids), and with weirdly apt timing, the guy says to me: "Look, man. I *told* you ... shove it up your ass." I am *so* not a beefy or fight picking guy. But I was in a moment. I turned around on this guy with a look on my face that my then 3 year-old called "scary." The mix-up was pretty quickly resolved, and the guy was mildly apologetic -- mostly for using crass language in front of my little kids.

Sassafras Occam's Rayzor?

Floyd is way cool. I went to see that live concert movie (Pompeii? (sp?)) at the North Park. Sober. Still cool as hell. Guilty pleasure for me is re-watching Beavis and Butthead clown on music videos.

(I'm still hoping he's a solid 5/6/7 guy.)

Fair. I initially read this as an observation re why JBOTS was so furious at his players -- because they are immature. Then I was like. Fire in the belly, and such. I mean - if JBOTS isn't effing fuming at what he sees from this team, I'd be concerned. Put another way: If the report came out that JBOTS has been observed watching placidly as the Sabres stink out their home rink night after night, people would be chirping him as milquetoast.

I saw that post on Twitter, and find myself genuinely confused. I wish I could know, from JBOTS' perspective: After "some suffering," what, in practical terms, constitutes "more pain?" How much of the current roster needs to be turned over before the franchise has a chance to move forward? Approximately how long will this take? I know that these questions are, essentially, 85% of what gets talked about here. But it's helpful for me to frame it relative to what Friedman said and what JBOTS might think -- not relative to what you or I might think. I need to know. What is the plan, JBOTS?

I can't count the number of times I've mistaken a sane person for a debilitated schizophrenic because of those damn things.

no diggity.

Useful word to invent, if it isn't one already. I think he definitely got some training.

Gah! I would totally watch a 2-hour NOVA special on precisely why this activity makes me feel a form of visceral rage. There's something to the cognitive dissonance element, but I would say that the situation is not improved if the call goes to speaker. I do wonder: Are teenagers/college aged kids bothered by these cell phone calls in the same way I am? Maybe the reaction is tied to experience rooted in past times. There's a lot of this, for sure. And a lot of the show-off business conversation too. But it's not limited to that, for me. There was a woman sitting near me in a public setting a couple weeks back who was just chatting in a fairly normal tone and volume with someone about what people from their shared community were up to (I could not tell if they were former co-workers, neighbours, alumnae of the same institution, etc.). It was the very definition of idle chit-chat. ("Oh yeah, her son was playing with Tommy on that indoor soccer team until the season was canceled . . . No, I had not. . . . Did they get a contractor to do it? . . . I remember her saying it looked old when they bought it. . . . Yeah, and there's a Trader Joe's there now too. . . . Hahaha - SHUT UP. . . . He is such a punk."). I wanted to defenestrate this woman. It is often an aggravating factor.

When I referenced evidence being to the contrary, I was thinking of what Thorny talked about: I'll also say: He has exhibited and projected a more mature, serious-minded when addressing the media. Sure, that could be a charade, but it seemed indicative of him moving past the eye rolls and sarcasm and embracing a more professional approach. I'm not saying that Eichel's not part of, the leader of, a coach-killing core. I'm saying I hope he isn't, and that it appears he isn't. In all events, Eichel is here to stay.

I would like nothing more than for Eichel to be *not* part of the problem. All available information seems to tell me that’s the case.

Well, the Sabres bought that centerpiece fruit for the foreseeable future.

This strikes me as a good read on the situation. Seems to me that word percolated up to Pegula that Bylsma was too focused on a complex system of X's and O's, and not enough on building relationships with the players. Then they hired Housley, and we heard this from Eichel in September: If coaches are hard on me, they're hard on me. That's fine. I also like my coaches to have a personality. I want them to be able to talk to me about things that aren't about hockey. You come to the rink every day and some days you're in a good mood and some days you're in a bad mood. I like coaches to be able to relate to me a little bit. I've had hard coaches, I've had easy coaches, and it doesn't matter to me how they are as [far as] their personality. I just want to be able to know them outside the neutral-zone forecheck and the offensive zone. Me, then: Dude. This is AWESOME. Harmony is upon us. Eichel *and* the Sabres are bound for 100 point seasons. Me, now: Mmm, 'kay. I find myself pining for the team to bring in one of those old warhorses who've had a few stints here and there, and who have had some success in the league.

It would help explain why he went from looking the part of a 4/5 NHL d-man to looking like a beer leaguer.

Agreed. Which brings me back around to thinking that there is something rotten in the state of Denmark. OTOH, the way that Housley was able to deal with just the d-men may not have readily translated to how he deals with the entire squad. Maybe? I dunno. Of course, even if he's precisely the same sort of guy with the Sabres as he was when he was with NSH leaves open the possibility that he is not a good NHL head coach.