Jump to content

That Aud Smell

Members
  • Posts

    24,540
  • Joined

Everything posted by That Aud Smell

  1. Well, now, wait. I concluded a while ago that Infowars is a "work," to borrow some wrestling parlance. It's a corrosive and dangerous work -- but it's a work. I think "all" is probably strong, but I think there's plenty that he just does purely for clicks and traffic.
  2. Same. It has not been an order of magnitude, of course. But they have improved.
  3. Through 41 games, the team was 30th in the league in points. They had 6 more than Phoenix, and 8 fewer than the next worst team (Ottawa). From the 42nd game onward, they are 21st in points. And they're bunched up with several teams that have anywhere from 20-24 points during that span -- that'd be the Blues, Panthers, Coyotes (!), Devils, Kings, Islanders, Red Wings, and Blue Jackets. I know they got the Lightning's backup goalie (?) twice and probably Boston's too -- but they've repeatedly beat the best teams in the East. I was at that Lightning game at home, and they looked very good. Consistency is the thing. They are getting better (?).
  4. Beane responded to questions about people (Polian) dogging Lamar Jackson -- said similar things were said about Cam. Also: J-Stew cut by Panthers.
  5. His “Hmmm’s” on Twitter, though. Brandon is pretty clearly someone who will speak through Wawrow, at times, right? I guess that’s different than a source, come to think of it.
  6. I'd bet dollars to donuts that's the truth. But what of it? He's no great shakes. I'd also bet dollars to donuts that the blogger has more sources in the organization than Harrington. (If he has 1 -- that's more than zero.)
  7. It's so lazy, so self-serving, and so self-promoting for Harrington to have done this. There's a blogger out there who claims he has sources within the organization that have heard that Lehner asked to be traded. MSM reporters -- not just Harrington, Wawrow piled on too -- chirp the guy repeatedly on Twitter. Call him a fraud and a pretender ("this isn't a Halloween party" said Harrington). Then the MSM reporters go to Lehner and ask him it it's true what the blogger said. "Of course not!" says Lehner. BAH HAHAHAHA. LOSER BLOGGER. YOU *SUCK*. YOU'RE NOT *HERE*. IN THE *ROOM*. YOU DON'T WORK ON DEADLINES. FOR A NEWSPAPER. .... Of course, anyone with a few brain cells popping can observe that Harrington's lil' faux Alpha dog flexing did nothing to eliminate the possibility that Lehner *did* request a trade and that the blogger *did* have sources in the organization, who, UNLIKE LEHNER, would have no reason to hide or obscure the truth of what Lehner may have said. *JUST* when I thought I could not despise that chinless derp any more.
  8. It's too bad that the new Explore and More museum is just a plan at this point. I think the naval park museum is a fine idea. If the weather's decent (a fairly big if, I realize), you could take a trip down onto Fuhrmann Boulevard and kick around one or all of Wilkeson Park, Tifft Nature Preserve, and/or Buffalo Harbor State Park. The State Park has a very modern and fun playground. I'd encourage you to take a look at them online -- there's plenty of information there.
  9. ^ Hear, hear. Also: 2 of the last 3 mocks I've read have mocked Josh Allen to the Bills. In other news: I need to stop reading mock drafts.
  10. He always struck me as a pretty emotional guy and one whose game is strongly influenced by where his head and heart are at, so I think that he will get that "fresh start" bounce that gets talked about. And he's streaky too. For several weeks before the trade deadline, he had been having little or no luck getting on the score sheet. I'd lay better than even odds that he fairly tears it up this spring.
  11. Hamilton with a writing fail.
  12. No, dude. That is precisely what I was saying.
  13. Rentals go at the deadline. Hockey trades are made in the offseason. I dunno, man. "It's very likely."
  14. Read it. Hamilton's not the greatest writer, but what's written there is clear enough. O'Reilly expects to be moved.
  15. Wait. WHAT? (I'm not all capping in dismay -- it's out of WTF THIS IS A BIG DEAL AND UNDER-REPORTED SHOCK.)
  16. Ah, I see. Okay. Yeah - I just tend to differ, at least somewhat, on that take. For reasons I've explained, I'm just not a fan of the player.
  17. Bridgewater. Man. I'd love to see that, but I'd be nervous as hell too.
  18. I'm losing the thread here. They "had to"? They chose not to pursue re-signing him (because reasons) and then moved him as a deadline day asset on an expiring contract. And the return was what it was. Why is it curious?
  19. Absofrickinlutely.
  20. Please. No sober commentary on pi’s take on the Daniels of the West.
  21. Oh, you son of a b1tch. Next thing you’ll tell me is that O’Regan is training with a Boston strong man.
  22. There’s something to this, in theory. I’m not of a mind that the inflated asking price was ever perceived or discussed as a reality, or that a team acquired Player X over Kane because another GM was being more reasonable on price.
  23. Do it all the time, in fact. The balance of this post is fairly incomprehensible, or at least a significant moving of the goal posts of the contention you were making (or I thought you were making). I acknowledged above that the issue of whether JBOT waited too long to sell is an open one -- albeit one that we're probably never going to get to the bottom of because we have no idea whether better offers were made in December or thereabouts. I can't really fault JBOT for hanging onto Kane going into the season. At that point in time, the hope had to be that the team would possibly compete for a wildcard spot. And Kane was one of the team's top wingers. Your theory on JBOT being inflexible on his asking price strikes me as strange. Even if JBOT had been getting the word out that he wanted 4 valuable picks/prospects/pieces for Kane, and even if that price was way over-blown (it would have been), that's not something that stops an interested buyer from making a deal. If a buyer is truly interested and thinks the asking price is insane, the buyer doesn't turn around, put his hands in his pockets, drop his chin, kick a stone, and shuffle off down the road. Instead, that buyer makes an offer -- maybe an offer that is as ridiculously low as the asking price is high. That is frequently, almost always in fact, how negotiations start. To the extent an inflated asking price has any effect on setting value (and I am not sure it does), it will tend to improve value. Yeah, I'm not sure where this guy might fit. Could be a 'tweener. Maybe if the team ices a good third line, he could fit in there. San Jose's savvy tack was to wait to make a low-ball offer at 2:15 and bank on the fact that JBOT wouldn't have time to ask 2 or 3 other pending suitors whether they'd beat it?
×
×
  • Create New...