Big Guava

Johnson would likely be in group 1 or 2...he played quite a few games for the Sabres and looked decent most times. Someone they had on WGR talking hockey described Rosen as a "tweener". A player too good for the AHL but not good enough for the NHL.

Jiri's son?

Never know who is going to pan out, better to not put all your eggs in one basket. Still have plenty of talented forwards in the pipeline

Haha, definitely not ... Regier might be one of the all-time GMs in fleecing other GMs in trades. Drury, Briere and Gaustad trades were all heavily lopsided towards the Sabres, among others.

Perhaps Peterka told them they needed to move him.

OK, well he identified the need and is getting as many resources as possible to ensure at least a few pan out. I can't complain about it.

Gibson hasn't been good for several years, stop wanting to trade for has beens

I think part of that comes from holding yourself to a higher standard and holding your teammates to a higher standard and having belief in what you are doing as a team. This team hasn't had that in a long long time. What many people are willing to do for something they truly believe in and feel an integral part of is different than for something they don't.

It really is strange that people still consider the Sabres "small" when they are the 7th tallest team in the NHL and really only by fractions of an inch since their average height is the same as the #1 team at 6'2" and the 14th heaviest at 201 lbs. I keep seeing how the Panthers are showing the Sabres that you "can't be a small team and win in the NHL anymore" but they are 3 lbs lighter than the Sabres averaging 198 lbs and fractions of an inch shorter(in 9th place for height) but still averaging 6'2". Suffice to say that "getting bigger" is not the answer it once was for the Sabres.

As usual, the other leagues are miles behind the well oiled machine that is the NFL.

Need to tell UPL he is in danger of losing his job...seems like he only plays well and stays focused when he has something to lose.

We have plenty of prospects already playing and in the AHL...we need NHL players not prospects.

I mean it makes sense logically. If you are trying to bolster your defense corp, why would you want to trade away a defenseman in return? Seems to not make much sense.

From what I heard on WGR from Dreger yesterday, apparently teams didn't want to give up a RHD for Byrum since they were acquiring a D, they didn't want to basically tread water there. Caused multiple teams to drop out. He said now that they got their RHD for Peterka, the teams that dropped out over not wanting to give up a RHD have jumped back in the mix...said now there are 7-8 teams very interested instead of only 3-4. Thinks the move was done because they realized the overall value they would be able to get back would be higher trading Peterka for a RHD and then asking for a forward back for Byrum.

I view this as part of a double trade with Byrum. Perhaps they felt by acquiring the RHD for Peterka, they could get something more valuable for Byrum which means the overall value of the combined haul they get would be better. I don't think we can look at this trade in a vacuum.

Planning to announce tomorrow apparently. Here are some pertinent details of the agreement, according to both league and union sources: The NHL will move to 84-game regular seasons beginning in 2026-27. The preseason will be shortened, to an expected four games per team, and players with 100-plus career games played can play in a maximum of two preseason games. Player contracts will be term limited to a maximum of seven years for players re-signing with their current club and six years for players on the free agent market. The 2025-26 season (next week’s free agency) will mark the final eight-year deals in the NHL. A comprehensive playoff salary cap mechanism, which has many machinations to account for player acquisition, will effectively close the LTIR loophole for teams to significantly pad payroll by using injury relief space. Signing rights to draft picks will be uniform across the board until age 22, regardless of the league prospects are picked from or which league they matriculate to next. In other words, if an 18-year-old CHL player is drafted but decided to play NCAA, a team will still hold his rights for four years. Outlawing of player deferred salary in contracts, which previously lowered the cap hit of deals. This is one example of significantly more stringent contractual limitations that are expected to be in the new CBA for players. One example of a new limitation: Signing bonuses will be capped at 60 percent. Previously, players could negotiate to earn everything but the league minimum salary on their contract to be paid as signing bonus for both tax and investment benefits, as well as making it essentially buyout proof. Now, if you have a $10 million cap hit, the maximum paid in signing bonus will be $6 million. Players can still earn more than the 60 percent in signing bonus, but that difference will be subject to the buyout calculation. Revenue split will remain 50/50 between owners and players. There are not expected to be changes to the definitions of what constitutes hockey related revenue (HRR). Significant increase in Stanley Cup playoff bonus pool fund, nearly doubling previous amount. Establishment of ‘full-time’ Emergency Backup Goalie (EBUG) position within organizations so that amateur goalies signed out of beer league are not entering games in rare injury circumstances. Landmark player benefit improvements (health insurance and post-playing health insurance stipends), plus movement of player payroll taxes and worker’s compensation premiums to be paid out of owner’s share. Teams will no longer be able to mandate player dress code for arriving/departing games. As previously announced in February, the next three seasons of the salary cap’s upper limit: $95.5 million, $104 million and $113 million. https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/news/nhl-nhlpa-framework-new-cba-announcement-friday-84-game-season-ltir

About time

Is she hot?

I would say C. It's hard for me to picture a Buffalo team other than the Bandits winning anything until they actually do it. Bills have one of the most talented QBs to ever play the game and someone that plays at an extremely high level in the playoffs and they haven't even been able to get to a Super Bowl yet, let alone win one mostly thanks to the defense that turns into a giant sieve against Kansas City when it counts every year. Josh Allen is not only one of the most talented QBs to ever play, but on top of that he is THE MOST PRODUCTIVE PLAYER IN NFL HISTORY on a per game basis in BOTH the regular and post season. It's hard not to be able to get it done with that player on your team, but the Bills have figured out a way not to.

Well I guess Sam Reinhart is kinda way better than we thought and comes to play in the biggest moments.

When you have the talent to succeed but continuously make excuses and have no accountability eventually you end up having to look in the mirror. You can blame everyone else, but at the end of the day, they are the ones on the ice not getting it done. In life you can either make excuses or get results, never both. All the players on this team have done is make excuses.

Maybe instead of looking for anyone else to blame and trying to leave these players should take a good hard look in the mirror and realize that they are the problem collectively and that they have the ability to provide the answers as well.

He was a perfect bottom 6 player for us and one that we spent many years trying to replace.

Evan Rodrigues wasn't good enough to be on terrible Sabre teams but somehow has been good enough to play on multiple playoff teams that have made deep runs and won a Stanley Cup last year with the Panthers(and on the cusp of another one this year). Also has 30 points in his last 43 playoff games over the past 2 years, so he shows up in the playoffs. Sabres love getting rid of players that go on to win Stanley Cups elsewhere. It's really almost unfathomable how many times this happens.

Adams was like