I am not so sure about that, counting on the odds that is.
I like a lot about what Adams is doing to bring in talented prospects and stick to a plan to develop them. However, his reluctance to improve the roster by not adding "blockers" in front of his band of prospects is curious. Unless a prospect beats out a real NHL player you may not have improved the team by moving him up. He can improve the roster without hurting the cap.
Granato looks like a decent developer of young talent. As far as him winning on game day in the NHL, that is still TBD. When I read the comments here about him waiting to teach winning hockey versus developing players, I get perplexed. Winning breeds winning. At the professional level winning what this is all about.
I am not an advocate for change right now, stability is what this program needs. I am not anointing either of them as savior either.