erickompositör72

Yeah, you have to cross the red line before you dump it in

The correct response is winning the game

Was that Skinner-Lazar-Reinhart? Or just a line change?

Not making an excuse- but, it the ice bad? Or maybe it's just getting the timing back & getting used to an empty arena (Marty just mentioned that)

Too easy

I think the league is going to take a while to figure out how to shut down Eichel/Hall (hopefully, they never do 🙂 ) I think that gives Ralph the flexibility to figure out where Skinner works best, while simultaneously sending a message that you must play within his system. If we were on the playoff bubble, fighting for a spot with the season wrapping up, I'd also be very annoyed if Skinner's role was not clearly defined. However, I think the firepower we have, at least early in the season, will give us this flexibility.

Maybe we should. Most exciting Sabres lineup in over a decade, yet some people are fixated on the bottom 6

I'm holding out hope the top 6 is fine without Skinner, and Skinner scores goals on whatever line he is put on.

What you're doing is like seeing half of the puzzle pieces put together, and then complaining the picture doesn't look good. You haven't seen how Ralph is going to match the lines up. You haven't seen how these linemates feed off one another. Yet you're so convinced? Skinner did very well on the 2nd line with Sobotka. I'm sure he can play fine with Sheahan, against more favorable matchups.

Last year, every team focused on the Eichel line to shut us down. This year, I think teams won't be able to shut that line down, no matter how hard they try. Also, our second line can now be lethal, as well. Which line do you all think will benefit the most from matchups?

And they were on fire. I watched all September '19 highlights the other day.

It's because this ad nauseam argument, without actual empirical evidence (stats of Skinner in an actual game with these actual lines) made by people who haven't even seen these lines practice, gets tiresome.

Yes, and what I meant was, let's see if this fails or succeeds before flipping out.

That's not actually the argument I'm making. I'm saying that Ralph has an idea of what he wants to do, and is assembling lines to try to accomplish that. They might not work, in which case, he will 1) not adapt, and create more outrage on this forum, or 2) adjust things to bring out the best of the players, without compromising his system. Your argument is that his dislike of Skinner is prompting to intentionally sabotage the team.

Many, including Ralph, I'm sure, would take extreme issue with this characterization.

So the whole team should just be designed around Jeff Skinner? I think this shows why Krueger is taking the approach he is taking.

It's amazing how so many people know with certainty how Skinner's line will perform in game situations—without having ever seen his line together in a game, or even in a practice, for that matter.

If this coach/GM duo was able to create this top 6, I'm confident they'll be able to figure out the bottom 6. I just feel like the focus on the bottom 6 is like winning the lottery but only mentioning/complaining about how you have to pay taxes on it.

Somehow, half the forum seems to find the bottom 6 more interesting than any of this, which is bizarre to me.

Just for some historical context: Was the word that JBott didn't want to give Skinner that big of a contract, but Terry insisted?

Ah, OK. But they took off under Krueger! right?

Wasn't everyone pessimistic about Girgensons, Larsson, and Okposo, in general, last year? Yet Krueger found them to have magic together? Krueger will get the lines right, and we will have a great team.

To the bolded: true, but we need that line to be a good 3rd line, not a good 2nd line

Let me remind everyone that Skinner - Johansson - Sobotka was a very productive second line last year, until Sobotka got injured. Good enough to get us to #1 in the standings for a bit.