Thorny

*Zach Hyman* is on pace for nearly 100 points. Scoring is off the chain this season. I know he plays with McD but, he did last year too. He’s already reached his output from last season

Dahlin is now 9 assists behind....Connor McDavid 6th in league assists, overall. d-man

Did anyone post this in a thread somewhere? Kinda cool * if you click the tweet and go to twitter instead of clicking the play button below which takes you to the full Pod, on Twitter it plays a short clip of Ferraro and Adams talking Dahlin I’ve been impressed by the consistency as well. Night in, night out he’s delivering.

Karlsson has a sizeable edge on Dahlin and Morrissey in d-men points, and those 2 are opening up a gap on player 4. I wonder if those 3 end up snagging the Norris nominations

The other thing about VO is his assist total is unusually low. Up until this season he generally actually has *not* been a one trick pony. So while it’s great to see he’s having a swell goal scoring year, I expect the assists to bounce back at some point as well

Vegas with a pretty sizeable response game thus far. Helps the Sabres

Cozens is so good I’m so happy we are in a situation where we are going to have to pay him a ton of money.

The Canucks sweaters are awesome. Boudreau continues to cook behind the bench

A Winnipeg connection too in a way, along with Savoie. Speaking of which, I’ll be at the Sabres Jets game this week - - - Win the next one and we are pacing for 90+ again

People really have no idea what’s coming because of the Tage colossal steal lol. Going to say this again for the people in the back: this isn’t advanced analytics where the Tage contract makes all the other contracts around him better. The way the league works isn’t “find a huge underpay and hold everyone’s toes to the fire by that number.” The benefit of Tage’s deal can be found in Tage’s deal itself: we *can* afford to give Cozens and Dahlin and others what they will command and Tage being on a team friendly deal aids greatly: but it’s *not an exponential benefit*. It does not transform every other deal on the team

Krebs ceiling is a wee bit lower than top 100 player of all time Toews, me thinks Agree on VO, happy to say I remained one of his only backers when everyone was screaming trade

Maybe he’s just not comfortable finding the holes yet in getting it all the way to the net. Dahlin used to be like that, if you remember. Then his shot got good. Sometimes with great young players all they need is a focus on what they need to improve - we know he has the ability to translate his hockey sense into a high level of aptitude, that process probably holds true once he’s coached up on the areas he hasn’t had to work on as much pre NHL They don’t?

Mahomes is simply unreal

Didn’t get to catch the game, how did Dahlin look? Excellent? Happy to see Power stabilizing on the left, too - getting to stay on the left w/Jokiharju manning the right seems to help him

Have you seen how much in depth hockey talk there was during the WJC, every game about the performance of our prospects and what it might mean? As long as people put a lot of stock in that tournament, Casey’s electrifying performance therein (Wearing a bills jersey, no less) will have people thinking he can amount to even more. But I agree with your general point

I don’t think twitter says he’s any good either tbf

I got lost somewhere along the way apparently 😆

Wow, a Hallmark congrats if I’ve ever heard one

Source?! This would be objectively hilarious and look awfully poorly on Terry Probably would be one of the most damning things I’ve ever heard about him or any owner re: aptitude running a team

Alright. No problem, I’ll just work that into my argument, then: I take back what I said about the tank being dumb for potentially 3 significant reasons: it’s actually 4. It’s the first 3 combined with the fact that, should even everything go to plan with such a terrible strategy, and the balls bounce your way, which they did, they still must have been aware of the fact that Bettman could, on a whim, step in and say, “HELL no! Not on my watch!” Before laughing maniacally and retreating to his fortress of evil. Making the whole strategy even more dicey.

Ya I couldn’t remember which it was and couldn’t be bothered to look it up. the “better“ odds still made my argument anyways so went with that and if wrong, like you said, my point is even stronger thanks for the correction If I start a poll about whether there really was a conspiracy to “get” the Sabres... I’m going to be really disappointed in the results, aren’t I

So what are we thinking here: the most likely culprit was a grand, dastardly conspiracy by the league to screw the Sabres, they cheated them in the lottery, risking the fact that if that was exposed, the league would be in shambles? Or the fact there was a 75% chance the balls weren’t going to bounce our way This isn’t even Occam’s razor, it’s like...occam’s Rob Ray

Do you really think the league would have preferred McDavid in *Edmonton* over Buffalo? Those of is in *Winnipeg* refer to Edmonton as the middle of freaking nowhere. Think about this. Imo only the last one isn’t answered. edit- Sorry, the last one before the fantasy hockey one. obviously fantasy is important

They are doing him SO dirty publicly. What an embarrassment

We A) already know that there’s no wisdom in betting everything on one guy, we don’t need to wait to see any data on that, to answer @nfreeman and B) if the aim of the tank was specifically McDavid, and achieving him was the only form of success, that was a poor mathematical bet from the start and therefore an even more awful strategy, from conception. The only logic that ever even arguably existed in the idea of “tanking” was the concept of “McEichel”, which was guaranteed by finishing last. This is what many fans bought in for. But as mentioned, torpedoing the franchise to get ANY one guy I think has proven to be folly considering you drastically up the degree of difficultly in surrounding said player with a complementary team. Our tank was dumb for at least 1 significant reason, and for as many as 3 reasons, the inclusion of which makes it exponentially stupider when combined. 1) torching the ground and salting the earth for ANY player is bad. We know they inarguably did this. They also may have: 2) if they ventured into that thinking ONLY McDavid would be that guy, and they not only torched everything, but did it for A 25% shot, its a laughably bad strategy at the point 3) if they did it for McDavid (or even either) and did so under the prism of thinking ONE PLAYER makes the team, not just that they needed to burn it all down to get him, but that they consciously undersold the work they thought they had to do after, around said player (which I’d argue is exactly the case), it pushes the whole thing over to *chef’s kiss* all-time bad. Which, was sort of par for the course for at least a decade