Thorny

As arguably his biggest supporter I’d like to see a little bit more from Dahlin, even though he’s been good. T-7th in points for D is the minimum I’d expect, frankly, and I’d like to see that plus minus bump up too from -1, thought realistically that should come along with the team He leads the team in assists, but the bar is Norris nomination ie a top 3 league D. He’s that good. He’s pacing for 73 points just like last year, I think he has more in him for a ceiling.

In fine position after 10 to ensure their focus remains on, and that they challenge for, the hard-line expectation of making the playoffs.

Sauce is generally the best part, but you can’t overdo it.

I wish there was an Earl of Sandwich in winnipeg. Always liked those during my Vegas jaunts Edit - I’m getting word there is now an Earl of Sandwich in winnipeg

I feel like there’s little difference between the subs constructed currently, and how the subs would taste, if they instead were to just go to the “back”, and reach a big scoop into a big mixed barrel labelled “INGREDIENTS FOR SANDWICHES” before plastering it on the bread. i guess it comes down to my skills as a Sandwich Artist but, that’s my outlook

No you are thinking of forTE, former bears running back 4T=KC

I take your meaning but good defensive players who thus free up offense isn’t the traditional connotation for two-way. By the same token, Tage is a 2 way forward because the “best D is great offence”

Krebs is 1 way One point in 10 games, an assist on an empty netter

No. But Subway sucks regardless

I think I mostly agree with your opinion on 4T

37

I guess the thing is, he was 10th in scoring for F on our team last year with 26 points. So when you say bottom 6, it’s more like bottom 3, without an upsurge. If a few of the prospects graduate, he might actually just be a true bonafide bottom 6er who, yet, isn’t good enough to be on the team. Depends on his all around game I guess. For my part, it’s not that he has to go, he’s just frankly one of the players closer to the end of the plank even trading Olofsson, a lot of people think he’s more of a 13th man. Krebs could just be a milestone of sorts: a player we trade purely to upgrade to better when we already had good enough- which I’m not sure we’ve seen yet

As a neutral, I’ll root for 7 games

Jost - Cozens - Tuch could be really good

I’m 54 years old

Honestly? I just wanted to post that gif again Don’t disagree with the bold

@PerreaultForeverattempting to dodge @Curt’s well aimed/reasoned punches in this thread like

Need a D-backs win. Would at least make the series interesting and the Rangers can win at home if it comes to that

I suppose there’s sort of two questions: why didn’t they move him, but also: why didn’t they replace him with a better player everything you said makes sense provided there was no one else better that could have been reasonably acquired to be that 13th man

I don’t expect their salaries to be very comparable either, though, so I’m going to hold serve on this one

There’s also that stat Pi has frequently alluded to about our goalies being better on the road: look for a good performance from 6k tonight

I don’t get the trade in division thing. Surely if you don’t think he’s any good that supersedes the fear you’d get from playing against him? Haha If you don’t want to trade him in division because you are fearful it’ll bite you in the ass you wouldn’t have a hard-line view on his ability in the first place or at least not a wholly negative one: in which case the reason is more likely that they expect he can still contribute

I don’t really like the “7 million for a 3C?” argument. Imagine the Pens lowballing Malkin because “hey actually you are our 2C”. Position they play is merely semantics if the actual production is representative of more