Thorny

I wish I could do that. But for me, my first love wasn’t hockey. My first love was the Buffalo Sabres. They introduced me to the game, not the other way around. I’ve been a fan literally longer than I can remember because of my dad: there was no choice. I don’t really give a sh*t about hockey, truly, beyond the Buffalo Sabres. And that’s me being candid

Look no further than the fact both “sides” have issues with what I wrote Because by value in, value out, we’ve improved

It’s not snark (would say if it was, I’m snarky all the time) Adams actually does operate this way: at least in my estimation. But I’m not being disingenuous - I think it’s a “good” trade. I tend to attempt to evaluate both by the prism of what I myself would do, but also by what Adams in his mind was trying to accomplish. Usually there are several angles in interpreting these things - I try to avoid black and white

It’s a candid, and believable approach, too. Don’t see it as disingenuous at all as maybe alluded to in thread. I’ve mentioned this before (usually when people say, “what do you think this is, a video game?” in response to asking the GM to make moves), that I’ve suspected some (actually a lot of people) just prefer what I term the actual video game, the Online GM Simulator mode where we analyze prospects, figure out the long term cap sheet, etc etc. Not trying to clown that approach at all: it’s more likely to lead to satisfaction if that’s one’s M.O. Same reason I’ve opined that being a “hater” of a team actually has intrinsic logical value: that team is mathematically extremely likely to not win the Cup every year. You can get a lot of mileage from just rooting against rather than for. Being a sports fan(atic) is indisputably illogical and in the end we only have ourselves to blame for continually “purchasing” a product we don’t like

Surprised there aren’t more tbh

He probably just laughs and laughs about all of us, if he ever gets wind of it even at all. In seriousness, none of this actually matters because the 💲goes up up up. It’s beyond sports, it’s just how the world works Pat probably did too I guess Seems like ages ago. It was such an Occam’s razor, clear sign in retrospect that he just bailed. People that don’t obsess over this stuff like we are destined to forever are just like “ok, I’m out” because they realize the absurdity of what we are doing here so quickly

It’s absolutely a good trade. By the only metric Adams cares about: value within a vacuum. We come out ahead here. It’s a good trade by value comparison. Much more saliently: It’s also a mark of poor performance from the GM, assuming we don’t make other moves: as it’s insufficient in addressing needs. But the trade itself is a good one. We are the victors! We won this trade.

And not make 10 picks every year Another “won” trade. In seriousness: we won it. This is the type of trade KA is willing to make: trades where he wins in a vacuum

That’s Duff Straw, meet: man Welcome

“We got him?! …we got Eric Robinson?!!”

I know this is a joke but in 101% seriousness we absolutely, positively, should not draft a player with our first. Imagine thinking ANOTHER 18 year old kid is what we need to fix this mess. We have a surplus, and drastic imbalance overall. Trade it.

Legit thought there might be a place in Buffalo I didn’t know about lmao

It’s all perception. These last 13 years of historic ineptitude: Darkness took me. And I strayed out of thought and time. Stars wheeled overhead, and every day was as long as a life age of the earth.

Ahhhhhhhh you think darkness is your ally? You and your Jets merely adopted the dark. As a Sabres fan I was born into it…moulded by it.

Place? I thought flats were a type

Rebuild relitigation game tonight: we win, our rebuild is better. Dems the rules. Go Sabres

I am Andrew Peters

I just want Ohtani. Everything sports will have been worth it if we (Jays) somehow find a way to get Ohtani. Which seems at least possible now when I would have called it unthinkable

haha

I honestly do not think they are very good. Isn’t Girgensons someone we should have moved on from in the offseason? From all my years of hockey my sense is if you are down a Girgensons and a Greenway (and a Tuch) you should consider yourself par for the course on the expected injury front. We were luckier last year, a little more unlucky this year..it’s all around the norm. If your strategy to make the playoffs is to hope for luck in this area and you don’t have the depth to overcome a more likely injury result, your strategy stinks. Teams get injuries.

Leafs fans enjoy cereal with water instead of milk

I kinda do

I feel like we have an assembly line of players where the expectation is “don’t embarrass yourself”

I already said I disagree with your other nonsense, it’s just not worth arguing about because we see it very differently. I see a historic run of futility as worthy of a historic level of angst. Seems about right. I don’t share all of it but a lot of it I do. I get you disagree, that’s fine. Not dying on a hill: But dude you jumped in and said “Kids, stop”. Come on now “Kids” is condescension and it’s worthy of a call out because you were objectively mistaken im sorry I WAS right? I’m sorry you felt seen? Whichever lol. I digress