mjd1001

After the replay, that was worse than I thought. Sure, he showed you up, but after the play, you take a run at him, a two handed cross check to the head and face? That is the EXACT thing they need out of this game. You don't like it, you get in his face, ask him to drop his gloves..and if he doesn't want to you drop yours anyway and go at him that way....cross checks to the head like that after the play are garbage.

Ottawa show boating a little bit on that empty net goal versus Toronto, but Morgan Riley across check to the head after? That should be a multi-game suspension

I think many of us have the opinion that Pegula is not going to hire, nor work with, anyone who makes him uncomfortable and even the slightest way. He wants somebody to let him be involved when he wants to be involved. He doesn't want somebody to tell him he's wrong when he's wrong. He basically wants to be a coddled owner that will always have rose petals thrown on the floor and to be asked for his opinion whenever he walks into the room. Every owner has the right to do what they want to do and many of them want to be involved, I just have the impression that his priority is looking for people around him that make him be comfortable instead of looking for the best people.

Many defensemen, even first rounders... Need a couple hundred games before they really hit their stride. He appears to fall into that category. I think he'll be fine, probably very good, it's just going to be a couple of years.

So with what...10 days off? Any lingering injuries had a chance to get a good rest. Then they played 2 home games, so they didn't have to travel. Dallas is a good team, St. Louis kinda average, but neither are even in the top 10 this year in goals allowed, they both can be scored on. Then, you just played on game when you got back, then had ANOTHER couple days off between games (at home again) to rest and practice. Neither goalie you faced this year is even in the top 20 in terms of stats this year. 2 total goals. By the way, this team was the 3rd best scoring team in the league last year. This year? The Sabes TOP goal scorer is tied for 48th in the league. Their TOP point scorer is tied for 60th. That is the BEST this team has to offer right now.

Who in this forward group "goes to the net"? The only way I know of to track that is to look at one of the charts of each player, where they take the shots from, and which ones are taken from the 'front of the net'. I looked at the charts of each player up to today, and wanted to see which player takes the greatest percentage of their shots from the "high danger" area. (Basically form a triangle from each goal post to the faceoff dots, then draw a line connecting the faceoff dots, and seeing what percentage of thier shots are taken from that 'in close/in front of the net' area) So maybe some guys are better from the wings and are told not to go to the net. But, to see who actually DOES to to that 5-7 foot 'tough' area in front of the net and see how often they get shots off, here goes: Benson 47.5% Girgensons 42% Skinner 32% Tuch 30.5% Okposo 30% Cozens 29% (last year he was at 33%) Mitts 27% Peterka 24.6% Thompson 24% (Last year he was at 30%) Greenway 24% Quinn 21.6% VO 19.6% Krebs 18.4% I got the data from: https://edge.nhl.com/en/skater/20232024-regular-8477949

So, they have a full week and a half off to get healthy...... Come back and play 2 home games (with a few days rest in between)... Against 2 teams that are 'average' at allowing goals..... Put up almost 80 shots between those 2 games.... and score a total of 2 goals. Exciting hockey we have here.

I mostly (but not totally) disagree with that. Thompson is having a down year compared to the last couple, but even now he is scoring at a 30 goal pace. Paying him $7m per year is about what a consisitent 30 goal scorer should get (maybe even more), but he has almost 3 seasons worth of games showing that is a floor, with a ceiling higher than that. I have no problem with his contract. Thompson also my not be 'good' in the defensive zone, but he isn't someone that causes problems (like Cozens) so I don't hold that against him. Cozens, as many now on this board I RIGHT NOW do not like his contract. He has one year of scoring 30 (due to a high shooting percentage that year) and every other year (including this year), over 160 games played, shows he is more like a 8% shooting percentage guy, NOT a 15% guy like last year. Even if you figure he might be a 10% guy, that translates to 18-22 goals per year for him. Add that to the fact he is BAD in his own zone (not for lack of effort, but for simple hockey sense), and if he doesn't put up 30 goals per year for you, it is a bad contract. Power? I have posted many times on here last year that I thought he was "OK" last year but not as good as everyone thought. This year him playing, at times bad, doesn't surprise me. But, I do think that most D-men don't hit their stride, until they have 3000-400 games played. Power I think is not good now, but I think he WILL be good, it is just going to take another year or two.

I like Mitts, I want to see him here long term. BUT if he is looking for a big contract ($7-$8m per season), I'm going to at least entertain shopping him. Again, he's good, but he's a 15-20 goal scorer, 60-70 point guy. Certainly that isn't nothing, but lets not make it out that right now he is an all-star in waiting. Best 2-way forward? That may be true, but being the best 2-way forward on this team isn't saying much (he can be one of the best, or THE best and still not be good). So again, If they annoucned they signed him to an extension tomorrow I'd be happy. But if he is looking for a big time payday, I don't thik he is that 'big time' of a player and I would at least LISTEN to offers or do some light shopping. He is RESTRICTED this offseason, no need to give him 7 years for $50+ million. The Sabres control this situation, make the best decision based on all information. "All information" probably means shopping him around and seeing what his value is.

The opposite is true with me. My wife works during the day, even Saturdays. I have all the free time in the world on Saturday afternoons (and Sundays) and love those games. Its the weekday games that are a bit tougher. I manage to watch most of them, but not all, because she gets done with work usually at 6pm-6:30, and then it's 'lets watch a show or movie together' on weekdays at that time. The weekend afternoon games I love though.

Yeah, no one is untouchable. That doesn't mean I want to shop them around but every single player you listen to offers if someone makes one, and every single player/offer is dealt with on an individual basis. You have a young guy with a lot of potential, who is ahead of the curve already? Don't look to trade him, but if you get a great offer, you listen. No untouchables. My opinion is Dahlin has potential to be a top 10 player in the league in the next few years despite him not playing well right now, I LOVE what Peterka is doing now (lets not confuse with with Pastrnak though), Tuch is playing better likely though injuries and he may be one of the top 10 forcheckers in the entire league, plus he's a local guy......but, someone calls on any of them and I'm still listening to offers.

Some of the late 1990's teams I wasn't a fan of. Actually, I liked wathing Hasek, but the rest of the team was terrible to watch for me. Plante, Audette, Holzinger, Audette, Dawe, Grosek...Galley, Wilson, Huddy on defense. I had zero connection to that team. Watching them was praying for one or two of them to score and then just watching (enjoying I guess??) Hasek hold on. They had some good years becuase of Hasek, but I did not really like the players on the Ted Nolan era teams. Some people are mentioning teams from the 80's. I liked watching those teams. Maybe its because I was a real little kid and winning and losing didn't matter as much, but watching Housley play, Foligno, Andreychuk, Turgeon, even Lindy in his playing days, Mike Ramsey was one of my favoite players ever...Again, they may have had some bad years but I LIKED those teams.

Yeah I have. Its hockey, even a bad game I like to have it on the TV while I do other things around the house. If its a good game they are winning, I'm glued to the TV. So yeah.

I'm there with you. A young guy who is VERY injury prone but has had very good stretches of play (especially for his age) even though it isn't all the time. He's at about 5% of the cap now. He won't be even hitting his prime until close to the end of his deal (D-men usually continue to get better through their late 20's and even early 30's) Unless he is 100% totally shot and useless because of injuries....even a somewhat 'injury prone' guy who is likely to get better with experience might be well worth it at the number that will soon be UNDER 5% of the cap.

This may hurt the most on the Penalty kill unit. Only EJ had more ice time on the entire team on the PK (and who knows if he will finish the season here) Sabres PK is at its best with the tall/big guys with the long reach out there, so they can cover as many of the shooting/passing lanes as possible without getting out of position. Who takes those minutes on the PK? Clifton I guess, but I'd rather have Samuelsson out there on the PK than Clifton? Power? Nope, don't want him on the PK at all right now, he needs his minutes even strength.

This week off is tough, we are running out of things to talk about...but with regard to what you said: -I am half way there with you on KA. I think he believes 'patience' is the right way to go. However, this D-group is just too young. They NEED a very very good veteran who can take top 4 minutes. They also could/should have got a legit guy in here who is a great 4th liner or decent 3rd liner who specializes in the Penalty Kill....NOT because the PK is awful but rather so you can put that guy and Greenway on the PK and don't let Cozens, Thompson, or Tuch to see the PK every again (Thompson and Tuch because they are getting close to that 'made of glass' in terms of injuries and I don't want their offensive skills wasted out there, and Cozens because he is just dreadfully awful at anything in his own zone.) -Granato, I'm not terribly upset with him either. I think the biggest issue with his is his assistant coaches and the development staff. He needs better people around him. Now, I have been saying for the last 1-2 years that the Forwards on this team are awful in their own end, and that might be the single biggest problem on this entire team. If, IF someone can prove to me that the style of play (and total lack of organization) the forwards display in their own end is a RESULT of a system he WANTS, then I'll be with all of you who want to get rid of him.

You listen to offers for your current players, but you don't force a move just to make one. You listen to who is out there and available, if a fit exists make a move, but again, don't overplay just to make a move. Some people want to hold onto everyone just because they over-value what they know/are used to.....others want to make moves for the sake of moves because "something needs to change" or "you need to put fear into these guys". I think both of those are extreme reactions. Every move, every non-move, every potential move, should be made on a case-by-case basis analysis.

Every player. Zero untouchables. Its all in the matter of what you get for them. Is McDavid untouchable to Edmonton? By most definitions yes, but you never say anyone is untouchable. Give Edmonton McKinnon, a futre first, and Makar, and guess what, McDavid isn't so untouchable anymore. Now is that realistic? No, but the point is, you never declare anyone untouchable, you listen to offers for every single player in your orgainzation. You can always say "no" after the offer is made, no reason to think you are not going to listen to anything.

GOAT Rarely used on any Buffalo player/team, but I was tired of it the second time I heard it.

My complaint for today....every once in a while early in the week I see/hear something that bothers me and I think, THAT is what I am going to put in the "complaint Thursday thread", but then it doesn't get unlocked that week. Then the weeks it DOES get unlocked, I often don't have much to say or got over the thing I wanted to comlplain about the week it wasnt' unlocked.

I have been trying to follow this case on social media, message boards, twitter, etc. I've already started to see too many "its not big dea" and "Its boys being boys" responses to this.

We elect a presiden in this country that is under 70 years old again.

I know the AHL has their own streaming package, but I really wish there was a way we could get the Amerks games on MSG or some other local station. It may not be 'appointment' TV for me, but there are many nights where I just want something on the TV what I can 'kinda watch' while doing other stuff around the house, on the computer, etc. Amerks games would fit the bill for that.

I agree on Power. EVERYONE can be a great skater, but on D you don't need blazing speed unless you are a special talent that goes end-to-end like Paul Coffee used to (or to a certain extent, Housley for the Sabres). The forwards though, it would be nice to have a couple guys that have the abilty to blow past defenders on a regular basis. I think Tuch and Zemgus are the only 2 that have the ability to do that, but they don't even do it that often.

So we are looking at the same data and just weighing it differently. When someone says "one of the slowest in the league", I think there are 2 metrics 2 use. Overall top speed, he is near the middle of the leage. In speed bursts, he is toward the bottom but not on the bottom. I kinda average them together...and I 'average' Bad speed burts (but not in the bottom 10%) with 'middling' top speed...and I get a combined 'below average', not 'one of the slowest in the league'. I respect your point, however.....that how OFTEN a player uses their speed might be more important that overall top speed.