WildCard

McCarron starting tonight

I like the guy, he does provide a ton of links and information from around, and he was good at starting threads for news and games and what not. My issue, and his I think, was that was about it; he was kind of like a robot, good for those skills but not for any discussion/banter. And any attempt at engaging him or disagreeing with him just ended up in, well, a tantrum Anyways, that's my 2 cents

Cricket?

Spent two pages watching a 26CB metldown with other posters and that was enough TBD for me for awhile

I would go with the Bills. The Browns have more top end talent, sure, but Hue Jackson is a joke

Genuinely can't believe I found 3 people to take those bets. I have a a few friends that are each throwing in $100 or so on a vegas bet that the Pats don't win the division ?

I have $200 on the Browns not making the playoffs and another $150 on the Pats winning the division, so I too am conflicted

Here's the answer if you want it

By the way, we did this again

Darnold started tonight with very different results than the first go around 8/11 62 5.6 0 1 2-12 48.3 -/- , yds, avg per pass, TD, INT, sacks, qb rating http://www.espn.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=401029381

Ryan Ellis talks about his new contract; why his salary is lower than he could have gotten

Working overnights this week

Erik Karlsson, still a Senator

Perfectly described

Agreed 100%, that movie was wild. The score, colors, and camera angles make everything so intense and foreboding, it's really something else. I had to look up the meaning behind it honestly, and now I have to watch it again to appreciate it

I'm not sure what the hell is happening in this movie with Gyllanhall, 'Enemy', but damn he is just great and bringing you to the ultimate edge of being uncomfortable

So a guy who had to change numbers and is now double or half that at the time of The Pede

Is it two number 20s at least?

I can see the first guy's number real easily in the picture, but the other two I have no idea about

I think you guys are both right

...Flynn? Gionta? Mezaros?

He can hit it as hard as he wants, he's still pulling everything https://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=1177&position=1B&type=battedball&pid2=1177&ss1=2015&se1=2018&ss2=2015&se2=2018&cht1=hangtime&cht2=battedball&vs1=ALL&vs2=ALL And here's a comparison (Trout) https://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.aspx?playerid=10155&position=OF&type=battedball&pid2=10155&ss1=2018&se1=2018&ss2=2015&se2=2018&cht1=hangtime&cht2=battedball&vs1=ALL&vs2=ALL Notice there are a ton less flyballs and popouts on Trout's. Trout also spreads his power out, which Pujols doesn't. The point here is, that although Pujols may hit a ton of hard hit balls, he drills them all into the ground, to the same exact place. And when he's not doing that, he's popping up everything This isn't something new for Pujols either, btw. It's not like he just started succumbing to double plays as soon as the shift happened; he consistently averages 20+ a year in GDP, which is not great. He averages 21+ GDP per year, over a 17 year career (excluding this year so far). Excluding 2015-2018, he averages exactly the same number, 21+ GDP/year https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/pujolal01.shtml

What killed his career was he got old (and possibly steroids)