Jump to content

TrueBlueGED

Members
  • Posts

    29,076
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TrueBlueGED

  1. 44 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

    How many of Jbot’s draftees are playing for the Sabres?  Dahlin.  

    The rest are Regier and TM draftees.  

    Jbot drafted physical players Samuelsson and a Pekar.  He also drafted UPL

    Jbot is still digging out from TM’s contracts 

    He isn’t being fired. My guess is he has a plan that he has sold Pegula on.  That means playoff next year when he is out from under TM’s contracts.

    That doesn’t absolve him of not finding a 2c or for other bad roster choices.

    Its time to waive Hutton and call up Johansson.

    He also still needs to make a move to improve the centers.

     

    The draftees may be mostly Murray's, but the players and contracts are mostly Botterill's. Okposo, Bogosian, Ristolainen. That's the complete list of players who were both acquired and signed to their current contracts by Tim Murray. 

    • Like (+1) 2
  2. 17 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

    I’m done waiting for signs of improvement.  

    It’s now two years in a row that Jbot has waited to long to support the team following a good start.  Adding Montour at the deadline last year and Frolik now are not solutions.  They aren’t even band-aids.  

    I’ve been saying this since Berglund went AWOL. Find a friggin’ 2C.  I applauded the MoJo acquisition.  It was a reasonable attempt, but what was the backup plan if it didn’t pan out?  Mitts? 

    Where was the faceoff winning 3C to anchor the penalty kill?

    Why has nothing been done to fix these issues?  How does getting Frolik help a team that can’t score, can’t win a faceoff and can’t kill a penalty? What do we need with another crappy bottom 6 forward. 

    Botterill losing GA is like Johnson losing Cronkite. 

    • Haha (+1) 3
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. 8 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

    After Black Sunday, they missed the playoffs twice and then made the playoffs twice (2010 and 2011), including a division-winning season.  In 2011, they were beating Philly 3-2 in the first round of the playoffs, and were winning game 6, in Buffalo, in the 3rd period, before falling apart and losing that game and then game 7.

    They then missed the playoffs in 2012, and, when they had a poor start in the following season, panicked, fired Lindy (instead of Darcy, which would've been the correct move) and commenced the tank in early 2013. 

    I believe that the right GM/coach combo would've chosen not to tank and would've delivered MUCH better results for the 7 seasons from 2013 to present than what we've actually had.

    Do you disagree?

    Yes. The best players from those teams were aging out and we had no viable replacements or path to get them. Roy was washed, Hecht was at the end, Pominville and Vanek were fading fast, and Miller was merely okay at that point. They were all set to get new contracts within a year, so we'd be stuck with aging stars on expensive deals or or the futures we ended up with. Our best hopes at that point were Grigorenko and Girgensons. That's not a situation which is likely to produce good results. May the results have been better? Sure, marginally do. But a genuinely "good" team that makes the playoffs 50% of the time? Hardly a likely outcome. 

    • Awesome! (+1) 2
  4. 7 minutes ago, Zamboni said:

    And since almost every move JB makes isn’t telegraphed or leaked before it’s actually done.... I’m in the “believe it (rumors) when I see it’s actually done”, boat. 

     I'm not actually sure that's true. Scandella and Skinner came out of nowhere, but Johansson, Frolik, Vesey, Sheary, Kane, Hutton, O'Reilly....that stuff was all out there in advance. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 3 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

    Correct.

    Would you rather have Jack, or have a good team?

    For example:  St. Louis doesn't have anyone as good as Eichel.  They missed the playoffs in 2010 and 2011, but didn't tank.  Since then, they've made the playoffs 7 out of the last 8 years (8 out of 9 if you assume they make it this year) AND won the cup last year. 

    Would you rather have their team or the Sabres?

    That's adorable, you're assuming the team would be good if we didn't tank. It's like you have completely wiped the time period between the co-caps and the tank from your mind. 

  6. 37 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

    It was 3-1 after 2.  The Sabres had 13 shots on goal at that point.

    The Sabres did not record a shot on goal in the 3rd period until more than 8 minutes had elapsed.

    My interpretation of Jack's expression and body language:  "JFC I can't believe I'm stuck here with this group of effing losers."

    Last night was the kind of game that can send a mentally weak team that's been suffused in losing ever since the idiotic tank into a major tailspin.

    Let's see whether RK can muscle them out of it.

    That's no different than in the years preceding the tank. 

    1 minute ago, WildCard said:

    Good news is you can just copy and paste this for next January too

    To laugh or to cry, that is the question. 

  7. Unfortunately, a team this thin at forward couldn't afford to lose anyone for an extended stretch, let alone Skinner AND Olofsson. The team should still make a big move to bring in a 2C who is under contract beyond this season, but playoffs are likely no more than a pipe dream at this point. It didn't have to be this way, but it is. Too bad. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  8. 1 minute ago, SwampD said:

    He was hitting guys in the hands and they weren’t catching it. JFC! The only balls these jokers can catch are picture perfect spirals placed directly in their hands with no one contesting them. Any time any DB makes contact with any of them, they don’t catch the ball. They’re really not good.

    An why is Dabol playing for field goals  in the third. They frigging went into their safe hide-hole shell. And why was there so many empty backfields in OT. He was calling the game like they needed to score a touchdown on every play instead of just running an offens to get down the field. It Was Terrible.

    Not on Josh. 

    ...including Texans DBs. Twice, one of which should have been a pick-6. One can believe in Allen as the franchise without treating him like an overprotective parent.

  9. 2 minutes ago, GoPre said:

    Unless there’s something I’m missing, what’s with the talk on Cam Newton?  He has a year left on his contract.  The Colts would have to give something up to make him their quarterback.  Why do that? 

    All year word out of Carolina was they were looking to move on, so presumably, they'd cut him. Of course, Kyle Allen then proceeded to play like Nathan Peterman for half the year, so who knows. 

  10. 1 minute ago, Gatorman0519 said:

    He probably should of called it a day after the Super Bowl.  His skills are clearly eroded and the magic is gone.  Father time is ruthless.

    I agree. I just don't think he walks away like this. I think he'd be more likely to retire if they had missed the playoffs entirely than after the last two weeks.

  11. After the Bills game, I honestly thought I'd be emotionless if the Pats lost. A hollow victory. Nope, it's still a nice pick-me-up.

    Can Brady's career possibly end on back-to-back home losses to a team that tried to tank and the freaking Tannehill-led Titans? I don't think so. I mean, I so hope it does, but dude is too competitive to go out that way.

×
×
  • Create New...