LGR4GM

It's not written in stone if that's the question.

I'm unable to answer in a way that would satisfy you.

Stop for a second. This doesn't thin out the roster. Moving out Kulich's potential for Robertson's actual, is not thinning out the roster. I think it's absurd to call a trade of Kulich Östlund and 9 for Robertson "thinning out the roster" Also injuries as an excuse not to do something is loser talk. You have no control over that and worrying about it means you're making moves based on fear.

It's fairly obvious but no, I don't have a link. That's just the scuttlebutt around the team.

Ruff benched Zach Benson for taking a penalty that wasn't even a penalty. He's ALWAYS been like this where vets or his favorites can ***** up but young guys beware.

What about Kulich, 9oa, and something else like a B level prospect?

Terry and Kevyn have decided that Appert is the next coach and this is Ruffs last year. It's basically the dumbest thing in hockey after the repeated terrible seasons to keep all the assistants and just promote your AHL coach. These guys don't have an ounce of the mentality needed to get better. It's all about their friends and keeping the ppl they "trust" where outcomes are irrelevant. Yes, we have a coaching problem starting with Ruff who Adams lied to us about. They had a fake search and hired Terry's nostalgia hire. Appert is here because Adams likes him. Why Wolford is here still is beyond me. His defense is soft.

What about Kulich, 9oa, Quinn, and Östlund?

I'm not talking about Byrum. I'm talking about what a real offer would look like. Peterka, 9oa, and a prospect. Do you think that's too much for Robertson.

As Napoleon once said "never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake"

You truly believe JJ Peterka for Jason Robertson straight up, is a reasonable trade offer?

And Dallas would laugh you off the phone for your offer here, which is why I'm not going to refer to it 25 times because ik you know that not a full deal.

Focus. Peterka, 9oa, prospect

What do you think a 100pt forward in their prime costs? Like for real? Peterka, 9oa, and a prospect is basically the price. It's always the price give or take a sweetener. Eichel: Tuch (Peterka), Krebs (prospect), 1st round pick (which was 16th oa), and a 3rd round pick.

Or I can trade Peterka and don't have to think, it's just Robertson is better.

Is it?

And the implosion has begun. Trump is threatening to pull all Musks government subsidies and Musk says Trump is all over the Epstein files.

Hmm. Is it just 9 and Kulich?

Robertson doesn't.

No

Saw that, good read. Also I've so totally ignored central scouting for being the hacks they are that I just more realized how low they put Carbonneau. Actually I'll add. I've had a crush on what Carbonneau does for a bit. I cannot understand why he's not higher in ppls boards. The puck handling is excellent. The skating is borderline elite for his edges and quickness. He's mean sometimes, like you know how we lament players not standing up for themselves or others, Carbonneau will stand up. Actually he might want to dial it back a touch. If I can't have Bear, I'll take Carbonneau... mainly so I can hear Marty pronounce his name.

Now there's a great idea. Carbonneau in the ncaa would be such a great development move for him.

Max Psenicka is gonna end up in my top 30.

He just doesn't carry the puck into the zone. It's a lot of boxing out a guy, getting a pass from someone and ripping a shot. The shots great but I think his handles are just above average, his skating same. I just don't understand what makes him special outside the shot. He's physical enough, that's true and drive inside but idk, he just never pops for me. I could be wildly wrong.