Mango

Dad? Did you get your cigarettes? Can you come home now?

Every time I see this thread title at the top of the forum I immediately think of Oregon Trail. Crossing my fingers nobody in Rochester has dysentery.

I am at my in-laws and was only able to watch about 10-15 minutes. This is a tough win for me, because apparently this means I have to spend the next 75 games at my in-laws not watching if I want them to keep winning.

Adding on to myself here. But I think the timing is right for some of the defensive guys in the pipeline. But some of the forwards are in a tough spot here.

I was only half joking. But if we are going to be a team that is planning on paying up to the cap floor, then he’s a decent guy to have in the room with whoever is in charge.

The tough part with that is that some of those guys will come up for contract extensions in that time. We can’t sign every young guy to 6-8 year deals for what they could become. The cap isn’t high enough. It suck’s because there are some guys in the pipeline I really like. But we have to start committing to a couple becoming “the guys” and use the rest to help build some roster maturity.

If we’re gonna keep spending the cap floor we might as well bring Darcy back as a consultant to help with the “money puck” *ducks and covers*

I can get behind that if Mitts stays at center.

There was a point in the 2nd I think, wher he looked very slow and almost unaware of where the puck was coming and going. There were three PP passes from Tage where he got cute and turned the puck over letting the Habs clear. All three times EJ’s comments about not over complicating it and taking the play that’s there came to mind.

I don’t disagree. I’ll cross that bridge when we get there. But the team has gotten better since the opening puck drop. They’ve played very good hockey the last two games. We’re on pace for what I needed my “positive floor” to be.

Man, I am at my I laws and missed the first half of the 3rd. I thought we played really well through 2. This one sucks because we felt like the better team. I said earlier that I would be “OK” if the Sabres started 3-6, but didn’t lose two in a row, and we’re working through some things while getting better at two way hockey. I stand by that. The team is getting better. Don’t go on losing streaks, keep getting better at the weakest parts of our game, and we can still get there. I really liked this team the last two games.

Conner Clifton is on pace for a 32 goal season….against his own team.

I think one thing everybody needs to get over is that if everybody is producing who gives a shirt. The top two lines had a great night. Mitts helps Skinner/Tuch. Greenway helps Thompson/Cozens. We should view it as a positive. As high as we are in Cozens and Thompson, we can be even better with a little more balance to everybody’s skill sets. LFG

I agree; but I think the standard road whites are so good. Classic Sabres look. I am fully behind the goat heads at home. But I like our white road jerseys the way they are.

I think I’m at a point where I’d love this team to permanently wear the black goat heads at home and standard white jerseys on the road.

I knew this game was over when Tucher dropped the gloves. The boss lady is on the west coast, I grabbed a Moe.saic 4 pack, grilled a steak and watched alone at home. AT throwing punches got me fired up which fired up with the doggos. Special shout out to Comrie who played well. I’d like some more rebound control, but the defensive pairings were in sync and cleared quickly. So happy the team played a fun, watchable, fiery game.

If keeping Mitts in the top 6 is part of the plan they should get him extended in short order.

That was a lot of fun. A big part of my frustration was it just wasn’t good hockey and it sucked to watch. Part of the problem with the drought just wasn’t losing it was that it was totally unwatchable hockey. I have had some PTSD the last week or so. I liked this game. I’m also going to pat myself in the back as somebody who has pounded the table for Skinner - Mitts - Tuch and Greenway - Thompson - Cozens.

It changes a bit if/when Benson or Quinn comes back. Not that today is a permanent shake up. But I think these are great lines to have in our pocket.

The crazy part is that as this roster starts to mature and come together, I don’t get the math. We don’t sign any high priced FA because “value” and “saving money to sign our own”. But we have a core signed for another 7 years. WTF are we going to do when Benson, Kulich, Savoie, Rosen, Quinn, and JJP etc. come do? Our top line is more or less set. We’ve been committed to letting the kid line struggle in the name of development. Mitts needs to stay, none of those guys fit Greenway; and Benson is clearly the leader of the prospect pack right now. Our entire 4th line are FA next year, and zero prospects fit there/are ready? We either have to start to move those guys out, or we have to start to think about moving some other more established players for different established players. Otherwise we will either just let them walk or we’ll just recycle dealing with struggling kids for the sake of the future.

It’s early so let me start there. But as I’ve posted post Calgary game, I’m starting to wonder if a lot of this is personnel not system. By that I mean, I think we have a core that plays fast offensive hockey. I don’t know that we need to change that so much as we need to do a better job filling in the gaps. I think we have to accept that even though they’re big Cozens and Thompson aren’t great two way players. And instead of having them shift their game, we need to help support their lines with more/better power forwards. The defense needs a younger version of EJ to play up with Power. If Clifton can figure it out as the season progresses, that third line will be fine. Go move Kulich, Rosen, and RJ. Bring in guys like Mieir and/or Chychrun. (Just throwing out last years names) We don’t need to change everybody’s game. They need to improve, sure. But they need help, not a makeover. We just need better supporting players for our stars. Last year we had a scoring line, a kid/prospect line, a middling line, and a defensive line. Instead of trying to make Thompson a different player just give him more help on the wing. Greenway - Cozens - Thompson was a great line, injured or not.

I don't disagree. But my point is what is that $6M providing to us right now? Would you rather have $6M in cap space or another capable, even often injured goalie on the roster? Even if you pay Ullmark $6M for 35 games. For $6M we could get 35 decent games from an NHL starter and given us the freedom to allow Levi to mature a bit in Rochester, maybe get 20 games this year, before thrusting him into 40, 50, 60 NHL games out of the gate.

I agree with you. I just meant that if Levi plays the lions share of games this year, 50-60 games. I don't know how much going back there is in 24-25. At that point he is the entrenched starter. Of course teams can always do whatever they want, but things do get tricky.

I want (need?) this team to make the playoffs so bad. But if there is a chance that Levi is this generational goalie that some say he could be then we need to protect his progression at all costs. This is less about this "day-to-day" injury and more about the work load we are anticipating for the kid. It feels like Levi is a lynch pin to the whole plan. If we break this kid I think there is a real chance we are back to the Eichel era of selling off all the pieces we acquired to start over.

I think that if Levi is the generational goalie that the Sabres seem to think he is, you protect his development at all costs. For a regime that has been so long term focused, this one is very desperate and short sighted. We save all of this cap space for "the future". And take a weird moral high ground in not "overpaying Ullmark". I just don't get it. WTF are we using the money we saved for now? Ullmark/Comrie last year and this year. Ullmark/Levi for 2024-25. Levin/??? 26. That feels responsible and still a very quick progression for a goaltender in the NHL. We didn't use the $6M last year and we aren't using the $6M this year. So if we aren't adding anything with it, we aren't saving it either.