PromoTheRobot

Everyone make a mental note: Sharks game Tuesday is an ESPN+ exclusive game. No MSG.

PROGRAM ALERT: Sabres @ Sharks Tuesday 10:30pm is an ESPN+ exclusive game. No MSG.

@LabattBlueis a jinx. 😄

They clogged our passing lanes. Teams are starting to game plan for us. Don has to come up with a wrinkle.

I bought tickets for the Sabres game there too soon.

The book is out on us. Going to be harder here out

They need to play better than tonight.

They stole 2!!

They want Anderson for San Jose. Expect Toker against the Kings.

Fat. Juicy. Rebound.

If he wants to be in Buffalo? Sure. He's from BC so this is not close to home.

What could he fetch at the deadline?

Since it isn't an ESPN+ exclusive game, yes.

That I don't know but it makes sense since it undercuts MSG.

Actually it is on ESPN+. The games @bob_sauve28 listed are exclusives and not on MSG. The only games that won't be on ESPN+ are two TNT games, and those are late in the season.

But then you have to avoid anything that will tip you off to the score. Worst part for me if I'm forced to watch on delay.

I'm naturally a night owl, even though I'm maintaining my wife's earlier schedule of late. I'll be watching all these West coast games. I'll have a fire🔥 going and my dogs with me.

I'm watching, 3 goals on 7 shots. Woof.

So I guess I'm on trial now? I'm reading those selected posts and I don't get what you're trying to prove. That I disagree with people? That I don't understand a forum where posters don't watch the team but still post about them? That I don't want to join in the tar and feathering parties? Guilty as charged.

But does a grievance win for Jack nullify the CBA? I don't think so. This is another reason why I don't get the "Sabres are worried about Jack filing a grievance" thing. The arbitrator that would hear a grievance doesn't have the standing or authority to suspend the entire CBA. They also can't force the Sabres to grant Jack's wish. That would have to go into the courts. Perhaps all the way to the Supreme Court. And Jack's contract would have ended by that time. I think this grievance thing is more theater. Just another pressure move on Kevyn Adams.

Pot meet kettle. Let me remind you of the post you made moments before: So that comment is okay but mine isn't? I get that I'm a huge buzzkill for the people who want the Pegulas to crash and burn. But as someone here once said, I'm just trying to be balanced. It's far to easy to crank people up into a frenzy over perceived misdeeds and lose track of what's actually going on. There's also a massive case of blue balls waiting for the Eichel deal to come to a conclusion. We want to keep blaming this team for everything when nothing is the same.

I'm sorry, did I miss something. All that was reported was things we already knew. Actually, Jack winning a grievance might be just what the Sabres need. If they are being held back by insurance and liability concerns, a judgement for Jack may free them from that without the team losing their rights to the player. Probably not the result you were hoping for.