apuszczalowski Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 Well, I guess Regier won't need to worry about getting a new backup goalie, Its Biron again. I'm sure he is so excited right now that he is coming back his cozy spot on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetweenThePipes00 Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 Well, I guess Regier won't need to worry about getting a new backup goalie, Its Biron again. I'm sure he is so excited right now that he is coming back his cozy spot on the bench I don't know, Biron still might end up in Detroit ... maybe not for much, but can they really go in with Osgood and Hasek? Why not bring in Vernon and make it a 3-way battle of the old guys ... I bet Carrado Micalef is available too ... Actually, what if Osgood was part of a deal for Biron? $900,000 for osgood to play 20 games ... we could do worse ... Yes, I am talking out my ass ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalOhio Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 Biron for Osgood would be a good move for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted July 31, 2006 Report Share Posted July 31, 2006 For once, Detroit may actually be ready to stick with one of their prospects. Jim Howard was a damn good goalie at the college level, but he's not quite NHL ready yet. A one year deal for old man Hasek means Howard probably will get his shot next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted August 1, 2006 Report Share Posted August 1, 2006 http://www.nhlpa.com/WebStats/PlayerBiography.asp?ID=2243 The price is right for a washed up future hall of famer. $750k/1 year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 1, 2006 Report Share Posted August 1, 2006 Well, as much as us Sabres fans want to believe he is, if you watched Hasek before the olympic break, he didn't look washed up. The guy can still play, and is a better option then some of the other older goalies still trying to play (cough) Belfour (cough) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BetweenThePipes00 Posted August 1, 2006 Report Share Posted August 1, 2006 I don't think he's washed up in the sense that he can't play ... if you had to win one game, you could do worse. BUt he IS still insane and he can't stay healthy for the long haul. For that price it's not a horrible risk, but I think I'd want a backup plan or at least someone I can truse to play 40 games so maybe Hasek hits the playoffs healthy for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalOhio Posted August 1, 2006 Report Share Posted August 1, 2006 As soon as a goalie gets hurt, someone will come knocking at Buffalo's door. The price will be high for Biron, perhaps a 1st rounder if they're desperate enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 1, 2006 Report Share Posted August 1, 2006 As soon as a goalie gets hurt, someone will come knocking at Buffalo's door. The price will be high for Biron, perhaps a 1st rounder if they're desperate enough. Or they turn to the FA market that still has some decent backups left (Boucher, Legace) and not give up a 1st rounder. Was this the plan all along? wait for the goalie market to dry up worse then the shahara and then drive up the price of Marty to where teams still won't jump at the offer? I actually feel sorry for him, the guy deserves a chance to atleast try for a starting job somewhere, probably wasn't a smart move to sign that Qualifying Offer "To speed up the trade progress" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabresForCup Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 I still think Biron will be traded. That is too much money for a backup goalie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 I still think Biron will be traded. That is too much money for a backup goalie! The problem is "Where to?" That is too much for a backup goalie, but when no one in the league is looking for a goalie, its kind of hard to make a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hopeleslyobvious Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Or they turn to the FA market that still has some decent backups left (Boucher, Legace) and not give up a 1st rounder. Was this the plan all along? wait for the goalie market to dry up worse then the shahara and then drive up the price of Marty to where teams still won't jump at the offer? I actually feel sorry for him, the guy deserves a chance to atleast try for a starting job somewhere, probably wasn't a smart move to sign that Qualifying Offer "To speed up the trade progress" What if there were no good offers for him in the first place? You seem like you would much rather be critical for a deal not happening than answer that question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 What if there were no good offers for him in the first place? You seem like you would much rather be critical for a deal not happening than answer that question. Well, I have heard people saying they would be happy with picks, to prospects, to some big names for Biron, I on the other hand just want to see the mess over with, if he wants to start somewhere else, let him go, get whatever you can for him and save that money for someone else. I'd hate to see a guy like Briere go because of salary while Biron is still sitting on the bench getting payed what he is. He won't be the starter here, he knows it, we know it, everyone knows it, so its time to move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGM Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Well, I have heard people saying they would be happy with picks, to prospects, to some big names for Biron, I on the other hand just want to see the mess over with, if he wants to start somewhere else, let him go, get whatever you can for him and save that money for someone else. I'd hate to see a guy like Briere go because of salary while Biron is still sitting on the bench getting payed what he is. He won't be the starter here, he knows it, we know it, everyone knows it, so its time to move on. Amen. And dare I say...Double Amen.* *The above post does not represent the religious views, expressions, or practices of the poster, nor does it posit the existance of a supreme being or its involvement in the choosing, promoting, and, it would seem, communicating to, champions of sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hopeleslyobvious Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Well, I have heard people saying they would be happy with picks, to prospects, to some big names for Biron, I on the other hand just want to see the mess over with, if he wants to start somewhere else, let him go, get whatever you can for him and save that money for someone else. I'd hate to see a guy like Briere go because of salary while Biron is still sitting on the bench getting payed what he is. He won't be the starter here, he knows it, we know it, everyone knows it, so its time to move on. Why let him go now for a bag of used pucks when a couple of months down the line you may be able to get more value for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Why let him go now for a bag of used pucks when a couple of months down the line you may be able to get more value for him. Because his salary is off the payroll and it can help sign someone else that still needs to be re-signed. It would have been nice to get somethin good for him, but that time has passed since we took too long to get a deal done, now you taking a chance paying him starter money to keep him on a bench (something everyone here would agree they can't aford to do) and let someone that could have a bigger impact go because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hopeleslyobvious Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Because his salary is off the payroll and it can help sign someone else that still needs to be re-signed. It would have been nice to get somethin good for him, but that time has passed since we took too long to get a deal done, now you taking a chance paying him starter money to keep him on a bench (something everyone here would agree they can't aford to do) and let someone that could have a bigger impact go because of it. Someone will lose a starting goalie at some point. Patience is key here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 Someone will lose a starting goalie at some point. Patience is key here. But will they lose one before we have to purge some salary to keep a player around that will see ice time? Before everyone was so concerned with TG's money and the budget, but now its different? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hopeleslyobvious Posted August 2, 2006 Report Share Posted August 2, 2006 But will they lose one before we have to purge some salary to keep a player around that will see ice time? Before everyone was so concerned with TG's money and the budget, but now its different? Everyone was concerned about overspending for players because it will hurt the team in the long run. Paying Biron for a short period of time waiting for the right deal may be better off for the team in the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.