Three headed goalie monster coming to an end?

[shrader]

19 hours ago, Eleven said:

We diverge here.  I think that's exactly what was happening.

My issue is at this point where they are trying to salvage their season, they need to be playing the guy who gives them the best chance at a win.  If they're playing someone else simply to showcase him, that's a mistake.  And if that best chance at a win is also the guy they're showcasing, he shouldn't be on the block at all.

[SabreFinn]

On 12/2/2025 at 11:11 PM, Porous Five Hole said:

Something I find interesting.  From Elliotte Friedman on Friday:

“Luukkonen has asked to play more.”

“You know, Luukkonen wanted to play more.”

While I don’t have a problem with a guy wanting the crease, it’s weird to me that Friedman reported this while talking about the  Sabres. Why is the player’s agent squawking to the media about playing time? What’s the motive?

It’s just weird to me.  

Luukkonen was asked about this by a finnish journalist. He answered that he don't know where Friedmann got it from.  He said that it is obvious every player wants icetime in NHL, and the irregular amount of games is difficult, but they just have to deal with the situation and be ready. He also commented on trade rumors that he like to be a Sabre and don't want a trade. 

[mjd1001]

The 3 goalie thing I think is an issue. You HAVE to move one, dont' sit around and wait for a good deal.

From most interviews over the years I have heard with Goalies, either during their career or after their career, they almost always mention as the #1 guy you want work, you want to play games to get into some kind of 'groove', and as a backup, you need to have a different mentality.  I think Biron even said a few times there are some guys who are BETTER as backups than they would be as #1's, and some #1's, that no matter how good of an attitude they had, simply would not play as well if they got infrequent starts.

Its kinda like with baseball pitchers. Some guys can be releif guys who go in whenver you want them, but other guys almost NEED to be starters. Mentally they want to know what days they will pitch and what days they will have off. Remove them from that role and the may not be as good, let alone they are going to be a lot unhappier with their role.

This isn't a video game where your goalies have 'ratings' and they will play to their ratings no matter how often or infrequently you play them. I think its hurting all 3 goalies, and the team, by prolonging this.

Sometimes I think this front office thinks they are plugging guys into a video game rather than playing 'real life' hockey.

This team, this management causes self-inflicted wounds.

[Archie Lee]

2 minutes ago, mjd1001 said:

The 3 goalie thing I think is an issue. You HAVE to move one, dont' sit around and wait for a good deal.

From most interviews over the years I have heard with Goalies, either during their career or after their career, they almost always mention as the #1 guy you want work, you want to play games to get into some kind of 'groove', and as a backup, you need to have a different mentality.  I think Biron even said a few times there are some guys who are BETTER as backups than they would be as #1's, and some #1's, that no matter how good of an attitude they had, simply would not play as well if they got infrequent starts.

Its kinda like with baseball pitchers. Some guys can be releif guys who go in whenver you want them, but other guys almost NEED to be starters. Mentally they want to know what days they will pitch and what days they will have off. Remove them from that role and the may not be as good, let alone they are going to be a lot unhappier with their role.

This isn't a video game where your goalies have 'ratings' and they will play to their ratings no matter how often or infrequently you play them. I think its hurting all 3 goalies, and the team, by prolonging this.

Sometimes I think this front office thinks they are plugging guys into a video game rather than playing 'real life' hockey.

This team, this management causes self-inflicted wounds.

Agreed. Adams often paints himself in a corner. I’m certain his biggest fear is that the goalie he moves goes on to thrive in another environment, while the two he keeps play to middling results. Also, unless he can clear Ellis through waivers, they are one injury away from Levi having to come up, and from the American’s season being turned over to a couple of rookies. 

[Pimlach]

22 hours ago, shrader said:

My issue is at this point where they are trying to salvage their season, they need to be playing the guy who gives them the best chance at a win.  If they're playing someone else simply to showcase him, that's a mistake.  And if that best chance at a win is also the guy they're showcasing, he shouldn't be on the block at all.

We don’t know what is going on with the goaltending and neither do they.   We don’t know how the Sabres have them ranked or who is the most tradable.  

After signing Lyon, why did they pick up Georgiev and then Ellis?   UPL was hurt and they know Levi is not ready.  
 

It is going to be hard to evaluate a goalie with the team defense being so bad.  My biggest disappointment in Lindy Ruff has been the way his team plays defense.  They make too many errors,  they play too casual a game in their own end of the rink.  He and his staff have not fixed a root cause problem with this team.  

Edited 2 hours ago by Pimlach

[Pimlach]

1 hour ago, Archie Lee said:

Agreed. Adams often paints himself in a corner. I’m certain his biggest fear is that the goalie he moves goes on to thrive in another environment, while the two he keeps play to middling results. Also, unless he can clear Ellis through waivers, they are one injury away from Levi having to come up, and from the American’s season being turned over to a couple of rookies. 

The goalie he moves will very likely be serviceable on another team.  Bank on that.