Jump to content

That Aud Smell

Members
  • Posts

    24,928
  • Joined

Everything posted by That Aud Smell

  1. Over in Europe, a Swedish prosecutor has charged the player who obliterated Paille with a blindside hit. https://deadspin.com/sweden-will-prosecute-hockey-player-for-blind-side-hit-1830738327
  2. I think I’m done with the ROR debates, too. But sometimes lively tangential debates arise, and need to play out, in an unrelated thread. Telling people to take it to a dedicated thread isn’t always practicable. It’s not unlike the difference between an honest fight erupting from the flow of play between 2 welterweights and a staged fight between 2 enforcers (not that those happen anymore).
  3. Man. Moments before the winner, I posted (in surprise and astonishment): He's a low-event, low-risk sort of player, but he's been surprisingly good most of the time.
  4. Agreed with this. Berglund is obviously somewhat limited, but I recall him being pretty effective a lot of the time in a supporting role. What's his situation now? Injured? (Or just hurt?) I know I could look it up. But why bother when someone here just knows off the top of their head?
  5. I think a lot of it has to do with the angle from which he watches, and then the fact that he's watching a tiny replay screen. But there's part of it that also seems to be just an inability to quickly process what's happening on the replay. I mean, I saw it at home.
  6. I understand what you're saying. There's value nonetheless in parents saying "that's off limits because the language is so foul [or insert other reason]." There's a message being conveyed and reinforced. Also, FTFY.
  7. I have not gone back and re-watched it, but I thought the GTG was an unfortunate, fluky one. I think I posted "fluky" in real-time in this thread. The puck was bouncing, became hard to keep track of, and Hutton lost sight of it. It happens. So he tried to cover every likely angle from which an attack could come. And Pavelski made a good play on it. Not for nothing: Ray failed utterly to make a fair call on what happened on that goal. He remarked on the replay that Hutton "got there in time" (or something like that) but that Pavelski somehow managed to squeeze it through. Hutton had no idea where the puck was. And that was not really his fault -- bad luck. Interesting. And each in their own, very different way, right?
  8. Lord, is this ever true. Our younger ones were recently allowed to enter the realm of Fortnite (or however it's spelled) through their game system. God, do they ever love that game. And I can see the appeal. Another thing they've asked permission to do is watch Fortnite videos on YouTube. Which, oookkkaaaaayyyy. I promptly put an end to that, at least as a matter of policy (I am sure they still sneak them), because holy moses are those videos ever foul-mouthed.
  9. I know I joined July 2006 - after the star-crossed (bacteria-ridden) Cup run.
  10. Can't say I'm familiar with it. I'll look it up later.
  11. I admit that I take some enjoyment out of deploying the Scottish/Irish phonetic spelling of an F-bomb. But it's far more important to abide by our host's kindly-stated request. I'll do better.
  12. That's a lovely tribute and confession. Few and far between here can offer that quality of content. There's something that's been pinging around in my head for some time, and I still can't quite articulate it. In essence, it distills itself to a few thoughts that I regularly have when enjoying something like last night's game: What if this is it? You know what? Maybe this is it. What more, what else am I waiting for? It's sort of a variation on the old saw "life is what happens when you're busy making other plans." Maybe it's, "joy in sports fandom is what happens when you're waiting for the championship clinching win." I'm sure it will be amazing when it arrives. But what we're enjoying now is more than sufficient for the day.
×
×
  • Create New...