JohnC

I have gotten the same sense of anticipation for Sabre games. The Sabres are a competitive and entertaining team. Even against the elite teams, there is no expectation that this team is incapable of winning. I don't want to get carried away but based on what I have seen this year, this team is one year ahead of where I expected this team to be this season. What I have observed over the past 20 games or so is that when this team gets credible goaltending, it is a good team. (And we have been getting it in this latest stretch of games.) Without question this is still an incomplete team because of the deficiencies on the lower backend; but steadily deficiencies are being addressed.

I'm not making any conclusive judgment in which team is on a better pathway to success. It's simply too soon. Right now, I would say Buffalo has the edge. But Yzerman has had a history of success of being an integral part of rebuilding two franchises. And as you astutely point out Yzerman's approach is different, although not dramatically so, from Adams's approach.

I have repeatedly said that I would take our roster over Detroit's. I also believe that the teams are in the same strata. The record and standing points indicate that. You also have to consider that Yzerman seems to be more willing to augment his young core with outside talent. Is that a better approach or not? Only time will tell.

Is that brotherly love or antipathy?

I don't consider Detroit better than Buffalo. But I do consider them to be in the same strata. It will be interesting to track each team in their rebuilding process. My sense is that Yzerman is more willing than KA to go outside the system to round out their team. Overall, I'm more than pleased with how KA has overseen the Sabre operation.

There are no maybes in that oldster category. You are either old or not. 🤡

Don't get fooled by the fact that the Sabres have dominated Detroit when they have played this season. Sometimes due to matchups comparable or even more dominate teams don't match up well. This season Detroit has earned 39 points in 36 games while Buffalo has earned 40 points in 36 games. In my mind both teams are in the same strata. I do agree with you that I would rather have our roster than their roster. I wouldn't put Yzerman in the terrestrial wizard camp. I have listened to him on a couple of occasions talking about the rebuilding process. He knows what he is doing. He may have a sour personality but he is a good GM. These are little deals that make you a little better. Inching your way forward is better than sliding back in a highly competitive league.

That's an astounding record when those two anchor players are on the ice. Getting Samuelsson signed sooner rather than later was a terrific move by the GM that will enable the GM more cap flexibility in the not-too-distant future. The accumulation of wise decisions by the young GM has gotten to the point of critical mass where this team is becoming good sooner than many of us thought (including me).

Moving Krebs to the Girgs/Okposo line seemed odd to me when it was made. Krebs just seemed to be an incongruous fit with those two thumpers who played a simple game with little flash. Boy was I wrong! It was a brilliant move that forced the loose playing Krebs to play a more simplified and tighter game. Although I don't think that it is a line meant to be together for the long term, its major benefit was to make a younger player play in a more of a mature fashion. Another coaching factor that compelled Krebs to alter his loose style of play was sitting him for a number of games. (As you noted.) I'm sure that got his attention. With respect to Joki I'm more positive about him than most are. He's still a young player with upside. (This observation on upside has been noted by DG on more than a few occasions.) And he seems to know how to play with talented players such as Power. Repeating what you have said about the coach, his forte is in working with and developing young players. There is no question that he is the right coach for this young team. KA has made a number of transactions that have worked out well. Retaining DG as the coach may be his most consequential decision.

You basically repeated what DG said on WGR a couple of weeks ago in his weekly appearance on WGR when addressing the issue of the Mitts and VO line. He pointed out that disrupting the other lines, including the Okposo/Krebs/Girgs line, would create other problems. What's different this week is that Quinn and JJ are currently struggling while Cozens is elevating his play. I would rather stay the course and let things play out longer. The coach is not afraid to juggle lines. And as you have previously pointed out he is not afraid to juggle lines in the games. So I'll trust his judgment on the composition of the lines.

He's not a flash in the pan. He will never reach your loftier expectation of him (compared to what I have of him) but that doesn't mean that he doesn't have a role on this team. He is a third line player and not a second line player. I accept that while you seem not to.

There is no question that Buffalo is an emerging team that is being recognized by other organizations. But what makes Buffalo different from most teams moving up the ladder of rankings is that Buffalo is also one of the most entertaining teams to watch. Compared to a few years ago when I felt there was no entertainment value to watching them, I now want to watch this team. I now feel somewhat disappointed when their next game is too far off. They are simply enjoyable to follow.

That's the issue being discussed here. Casey isn't the same as Cozens or Quinn. And will never be so. But just because he isn't what we expected of him, doesn't mean that he can't be a contributing player in a lesser and more simplified role. Jost and Lazar had to come to the realization that their roles in the NHL would be a lot different in the NHL than at the lower levels of hockey that they dominated in. That's the situation Mitts is having to deal with. What I can say is that Mitts has more offensive potential than these two previously mentioned players.

Casey M will never match Girgs in style of play. They are simply two different players with two different styles of play. I'm a Girgs fan. His offensive production will never reflect the importance of his role on this team. He's a tough player whose style of play is an asset to this team. That doesn't mean that in his own way Mitts can't be an important contributor. It's unlikely that he will reach the level of being a critical and indispensable player for us, but that doesn't mean that he isn't an asset as a third line forward. If there is a weakness on this roster is relates more to the lower lines and pairings than to the higher top two lines and pairings. I'm confident that @K-9disagrees with me that Mitts is more of an asset than a liability. He's a versatile player who can play on the wing, center and second PP unit, and when needed moved to other lines to fill in when injuries and suspensions happen as was the case when Skinner was sidelined. Although Mitts is a punching bag by many here. I'm not a member of that distaining crowd.

This clip says it all about McDermott and both organizations. The issue was simple: basic humanity and caring for a player. There was no need for making any calculations or consider any ramifications. It was simply about caring for another person whose life was in jeopardy.

You just hit on the reason why Mitts is the object of scorn by so many fans. The level of expectation based on his draft status with respect to his play and production don't match. Some of the sources of his struggles are due to a young player learning to adjust to a higher level of play and the training and preparation necessary to play at the highest level of hockey. As you point out, his superior talents allowed him to dominate his peers. But that youngster approach doesn't work in the highest level of hockey. Again, as you point out with players such as Jost and Lazar, they are working hard to find their niche in this league while their game is evolving. I see Mitts as a good third line player who is versatile enough to play on the wing and center. He also has enough ability when needed to move to a higher line when injuries create a need. He playing on the first line when Skinner was suspended is an example of that. He is also a contributing on the second PP unit. In my opinion there is too much effort to fixate on what he is not instead of what he is as a player.

It's going to be interesting to see how the organization handles the goaltending situation when Comrie comes back. What will the distribution of play be among the three goalies? Will UPL be sent back down to Rochester? It will be important for the front office to make an assessment on Comrie this season. In my opinion, UPL has a longer timeline as far as assessment period.

For some reason, after reading your post on that mouth-watering recipe, I gained three pounds. 😄

I wouldn't. No one can predict how a goalie prospect will turn out, even a highly rated prospect. However, if he turns in the short or long run to develop into a #1 goalie, he would be worth more than two #1 draft picks. When all is said and done and the tabulations are finally made about the return on our traded former core, the Reinhart trade may end up being the most consequential transaction of the three trades, including the Jack trade.

If it's not on Ralph then explain the difference in his performance while Krueger was the coach compared to when Granato was the coach. As far as his inconsistency in play there is nothing unusual about goal scorers having peaks and valleys scoring goals. What matters is that in the end his numbers add up to having an impactful season. There is another aspect to Skinner's game that doesn't get much attention. Under Granato, Skinner's passing and his responsible two-way play has noticeably improved. He's now a much more well-rounded player. As an integral member of one of the top first lines in the league he is earning his sizeable contract. Coaching matters!

I'm not sure what you are getting at. Could you explain a little more at what you are suggesting? As bad as Skinner was handled, the way the former coach handled Dahlin was just as egregious. He took one of the most talented young defensemen in the league and straitjacketed him as a player. When Granato took over one, of the first things he did in handling the defenseman was to allow him more freedom and creativity so he could fulfill his potential. Now Dahlin is not only arguably the best player on the team but one of the best defensemen in the league. The moral of the story is that people who work hard to demonstrate how smart they are often demonstrate how unsmart they are. What's the definition of a charlatan?

You make an interesting point that Skinner didn't complain about his plight under Krueger. Last year, Granato talked about Skinner and his practice habits. The coach said that even when Skinner was mostly sidelined by the former coach, what he observed was that Skinner was still one of the hardest working practice players on the team. He pointed out that even when the player knew that he was going to get minimal minutes he still prepared as if he was going to be a primary player. It's amazing how the narrative on a player can dramatically change from being a cap and player albatross to a player who is now worth his sizeable contract. He is now an important player on one of the top first lines in the league. Coaching matters!

Attached is a WGR link and within the link is a 19 min interview with Don G. In this interview he was asked about the Makar incident of waving off a penalty. His response was intriguing and a little surprising to me. The more one listens to him the more one has an appreciation on what his philosophy is in coaching players. I'm such a fan of his. I didn't want to start another topic and thought this link would be relevant to the current topic. If this link is on another post, I apologize for the redundancy. https://www.audacy.com/wgr550/authors/howard-and-jeremy-show

The only line that is not going to get touched is the top line, for obvious reasons. Sometimes lines get stale in their play. So changing the mix can invigorate the fading line and give the jumbled players a fresh/different landscape in how they play with different players. DG is good at juggling lines and giving players different roles just to re-energize them. I don't want to overstate the placing of Krebs on the line with older players, but it resulted in altering how he played. He went from being a young player who was often watching the games in the team suite to becoming a more focused player who played a tighter and tougher game.

I've heard Granato talk about Mitts on a number of occasions on WGR. My impression is that he has a belief that Mitts has talent, and as a coach it his responsibility to unlock that talent where can translate it into production. Is the coach chasing fool's gold? I'm not sure? On more than a few occasions he has stated that Mitts was one of the best players in training camp two years ago. Then he got hurt and never got back on that upward trajectory that he appeared to be on. When DG put Krebs on the Girgs and Okposo line I thought that was an odd decision and line fit. It turned out to be an insightful move that altered how Krebs played for the better. I'm hoping that this very open-minded coach, who is constantly experimenting to put players in a position to succeed, can find the right formula to get Mitts on the right track. With a player such as Mitts I have not made any conclusive judgments about him. My sense is that the organization is going to allow the player to play and give them opportunity to prove whether they should be in the organization's plans or not. My position about the player is that I just don't know?????