JoeSchmoe

I'm saying as much as people want to live in a world where they can use finite stats to exactly predict outcomes, the game of hockey is too "analog" for this to more accurate than the human eye, which can account for far more variables with far more dynamic weighting.

I'm an engineer that works in a world of numbers all day long. GF is a product of an infinite number of variables. XGF is a product of a finite number of variables. The eye test has the uncanny ability to process a nearly infinite number of variables that XGF cannot. It's kind of like how humans can beat a supercomputer at chess. Eye test wise, they're playing much better than before, and deserving of the 8pts in 5 games. (Though NJ could have maybe had a few more goals last night.)

Reinhart is a viable 2C. If top 6 wingers are available that are better/cheaper options than the C's available, I'd for sure go that option.

Remember that if Granato significantly bumped things up in practice, the results from increased fitness and skill development wouldn't show overnight. Advanced stats wise though, their FTW/60 (fun to watch per 60 minutes played) has gone up a whopping 93%!

Hockey is too dynamic of a game for rigid systems to be successful. Yes, certain situations are "static" enough to run some set plays and systems. However, once the game opens up, the players should be free to react in the best way they see fit for the situation. At most, a coach could employ some general principles to follow in these situations.

I just mean the NHL skill was always there, he just needed the game reps to put it all together.

Sure he had a few gaffes here and there but Tage Thompson has been an NHLer since his stint in Rochester where he lit it up. He just needed the big league experience to fine tune things, which we're watching now (he is still learning). Unfortunately, Krueger never gave him the chance.

At the end of the summer season, I'd typically take 2-3 weeks off, and in the fall mainly stick to 1 a days. But from winter to the end of the summer it's 2-3 training sessions per day. On "3 a days" it would typically be 1 weight session and 2 lighter cardio sessions, usually both on the water in the summer, or on the rowing machine and cross training in the winter. "2 a days" we're usually 1 tougher cardio workout and 1 lighter one. Coming from a lower-middle class family I had to do this, plus work to support myself. I couldn't stick with it beyond my early twenties as eventually I needed to grow up and get a real job. Nearly everyone that did end up making it didn't have to work like a lot of us did meaning they could rest while the rest of us worked (I delivered appliances). There were others on the fringes like myself that had the financial backing such that they could stick with it into their late twenties until they got their shot. One guy that went through when I did... and eventually made later on still has never had a real job and he's in his mid-40s.

I read your posts, and appreciate the live updates, though I typically check scores first then come on here for the board interpretation of what's going on. I actually reread this thread multiple times to try to find out why Quinn wasn't in the lineup. Scheduled rest?

I posted in another thread, that they should be able to play every other day, and the odd day back to back, plus practice every day at a decently high tempo. As a former rower that spent time in the national team system (but never made it), training 2-3 times a day 6 days a week is the norm if you expect to win. The work that goes into playing a game with 15-20 TOI, wouldn't be that hard to recover from physically for a world class athlete if they're in decent shape. Maybe mentally, or from a bumps and bruises perspective they might want more rest. Still, I say push them hard and see what they're capable of.

My 13 year old son pointed out that he can follow the games when Rick calls the games, but not when Dunleavy calls them. This with Rick well past his prime.

Where is this team with Tage Thompson and Casey Mittelstadt at regulars in the lineup since week 1? Not in the playoffs, but they'd be MUCH more respectable. Oh well, maybe its for the best as Krueger is now out of here.

How bad did Hall look during the OT? How is he an MVP 2 years removed?

I think we beat Ottawa and Anaheim too, pending Ullmark is in the lineup.

The Sabres aren't the worst team in the league this year, let alone all time.

Gas and oil are on their way back up. Hopefully that will help pay off Kim's yacht.

I like how Granato said they ran a practice this morning. Hate to lose this way, but I think that kind of attitude will move things in the right direction.

What's the scoring percentage from shooting dat far out on a goalie playing the angle? I remember he wasn't much further in than the top of the circle (though in the center, between the two). Is dat what you're seeing? And he had separation.

dis probably deserves a thread of its own. 🤯

You also see a LOT of goals... Way too many... where the D have coverage, but no F3 pick up the 3rd attacker. Since it's the two D standing around, they take the heat from us fans. Yes, this scoring chance might even come as a result of a lost puck battle from the D... But puck battles are 50% and losing one shouldn't result in the puck landing at a guy wide open in the slot or far post for an easy goal.

Keep in mind, the price of admission to watch the game on TV is for all intents and purposes free. I'll watch again tomorrow.

So you don't like watching his play? Your loss I guess.

I know some people say they don't like to watch the games, but for me, watching Cozens worth the price of admission alone.

That was not a generational play by Dahlin.

What was Risto so mad about?