Thorny

Somewhere along the way, I don’t know when, it did in fact meld into this for me. It’s about playoffs. It’s the symbol of, not our ineptitude, but that ineptitude’s historic nature. The fact it so defies science and reason proves its a symbol. The perspective of the atrocious results of the last decade were enough to illustrate to me that that “losing while actually in the playoffs” was/is plenty Green. I’ll need a new personality once we aren’t fighting for that goal, ya, probably.

This is good, but honestly it’s not even that level, for me. I don’t need to see a blockbuster trade, merely the fact he is open to any available opportunity is enough for me- he’s earned a ton of leeway re: thorny via: his demonstrably good personal decisions thus far. meaning as long as we know it’s not a stringent adherence to outside additions on principle (and it doesn’t seem to be, from what we’ve heard) I’m happy to toss up any specific “inaction” to “that’s his evaluation”. Part of this is because I don’t think the way the results have been tracking allow me to make a math-based argument for why we NEED that outside addition, when if the goal is playoffs next season, we seem to be tracking for it based on year over year improvement. We’ve had some factors work in our favour this year like notably health, career years from our unquestioned two best players (did I mention health), that next jump into the playoffs is probably a bit harder so including those factors in context, I think this offseason, though I mentioned our process simply continuing would have us on the right track, we need some stronger additions than the Lyubushkins. and Goalie...I don’t think we can do UPL/Comrie. But long story short, again, it’s their mindset: when *the* priority changes from “development” to making the playoffs next season, the likelihood of Adams weighing the idea of giving up a draft pick or two, or prospect, to bring in that DEPTH addition mid season a good idea, should (and I’d argue, must) go up. Playing with cash next year. To do that you need currency. Currency requires flow - which means less stringency to pieces beyond core, and especially pieces who’a value is primarily found in the future (draft picks), where, with an established core, said future is actually best maximized often by cashing those future-based picks in.

I love your spirit as it rings true in my soul, but I think it’s a matter of you just being one year too soon. They clearly clearly earmarked this for “development year” coming in - nothing we have seen from Kevyn Adams suggests he’s anything if not deliberate - I don’t think we see a shift in season. But next year is wildly different. Baseline expectation is playoffs - or we aren’t progressing enough. At that stage, when the results are priority, I’d side with you on needing to make the necessary supplementation moves

Agree. There’s the aspect of job security, too - obviously asking the current guys if they’d like an outsider skater addition who may take away their playing time represents a conflict of interest. So much so that I don’t really buy the concept. Don’t think deferring to your players works as any kind of long term strategy, and I don’t think Adams would be dim enough to think that. More likely he dutifully asks for input in all situations, and is smart enough to realize that when what he determines is the correct course of action lines up with what the players are saying, it makes a good quote

Son is a smart dude. Honestly, in a league where half the teams make it, I struggle to understand it, too 😆

Were they right?

- chemistry and culture needing to be prioritized, at first, over talent - I thought it unlikely Dahlin would establish as a mainstay RD (though he’s been back on the left, lately) - Comrie: I thought he’d prove to be an adequate backup rather than proving little of anything which, after this long, proves enough. - Thompson and Tuch being THOMPSON AND TUCH

Dahlin through 54 games played has outscored or equaled the leading Sabres point-getter in 3/6 seasons before last year. He’ll have more than 4/6 in a few games.

Dude you aren’t leaving one of us

It was a common L we’ve been losing half our games all year when teams lose sometimes it’s by a lot. I know for a FACT we do that to other teams b/c our goal differential is good and proportionally better than our record. I can also just remember the games. We just scored 7 goals, no? if we were occasionally running up teams, but never getting run up in turn, we wouldn’t be the 2022-23 sabres, we’d be the 2022-23 Hurricanes. said the same thing to GA: not yesterday, not the next 4 games defines the season. Yesterday looks like a big blip sitting right beside that mountain the next day but if you pan out it’s one hill in a long line of ups and downs that looks like a mixed bag, when we’ve built from only Death Valley. Losing to the leafs sucks but objectively it’s not special nor is it revelatory. Not diminishing your frustration and pain in losing - I just know you actually know that it’s better than feeling nothing for the team at all

Agree, the negativity in here is worse than the 83 All-Stars - - - Personally I think it’s a tip off to the fact people sometimes still get a smidgen too “high”, outside the GDTs between games, at this stage, with the inverse being the GDTs, during a loss, roller-coaster the other way.

Tough game. Next game we’ll have to

Detroit win unfortunately drops us out of 8th by points %. Oh how the turn tables. They shall turn back

Looking at the replay, probably the easiest assist of Thompson’s career on Tuch’s goal

Score effects providing a soft landing is always something I’m here for

Yes. It’s very dumb. And what was a medium coke at the theatre is now the large. It’s all very dumb and an un-hidden rip off

Well laaaa deeee daaa Mr Body Break over here

McDonalds is so good. but honestly 10 bucks won’t even do you right there nowadays. Used to be a Big Mac meal (No cheese) and junior chicken under $10 alas they’ve also altered the Big Mac recipe over time and as of now it’s settled on something inferior, if I must say

Whatever . we’d still wallup the 83 all stars

Isn’t the Tage line getting dominated defensively by the ROR line? Which F line do we have that goes good against ROR? Needing D and G is well played, we also still need forwards, or the development of forwards. I say it again the talent level overall isn’t at THAT level yet I think our record is proportional ie Granato = good job

Not in today’s nhl. We’ll need a Leafs breakdown though in addition to solid play on our end as the Leafs are a great defensive team. Or we need to be really good and really lucky, that also works

It’s 1998 and the Sabres are in white! Crowd erupts for our goals, too!

Love trivia. 2 time Harry Potter trivia contest winner actually. Once for The Office, too

“Hey, did you see Will Smith is back on Twitter?”

Correct me if I am wrong, this then means you believe Levi will be good enough next season to allow for winning playoff series to be a realistic goal? Of course, under the assumption we add the defensive additions you are referring to