Jump to content

Thorny

Members
  • Posts

    39,318
  • Joined

Everything posted by Thorny

  1. Obsessed with potential ceiling
  2. But cash and caring are “I want to win, but only if I can do it cheaply” isn’t caring
  3. “We tried” (But they didn’t, because they handcuffed themselves with “under adams”) Dude please don’t fall for that
  4. A higher career points per game in the playoffs than any current Sabre has in the regular season
  5. No room in Buffalo for a guy who has 62 points in 68 playoff games
  6. No reason to assume that in the hypothetical world where he plays 75 games? Sure he’s a legit 2C Ya I didn’t catch the player but they mentioned they had another C with injury concerns which is why Norris would be dicey for them specifically
  7. Jets have 8 goals in their last 5 road playoffs games. Issues are well beyond Hellebuyck, who played well yesterday
  8. The were talking about this on the fan hockey show. Led into talk about Pettersson, and the Canucks looking to deal him. Mentioned buffalo as a potential landing spot but they were saying the ship probably sailed for them w/the cozens deal ie Vancouver would trade EP for Cozens but Norris wouldn’t be enough, mainly due to injury concerns
  9. Not the issue yesterday
  10. Take the right lessons from things, too. For example, do you most commonly hear said, outside of sabres circles, that the sabres were justified in their medical stance on Eichel, just the medical side of things, or do you most often hear that the sabres screwed him over on the surgery front? Compare that with how you feel the sabres acted re: just their approach to the medical. it doesn’t really matter what happened, does it. Far more relevant where the sabres are concerned is the league wide perception: if you do not believe the sabres have suffered narratively league wide through the Eichel fiasco, up to and including potential agent and player opinions, you might be without internet and reading this on an abacus Lou is a respected man league wide. Very. The type of guy you want to be seen with. Infer what you want with that in combination with the lions share of my post above. But if you don’t want Lou, don’t complain, ever, about NMCs and players not wanting to come and “WCKAEHD??”
  11. it’s the exact reason we are where we are
  12. Make him the GM Guys it’s Kevyn Adams Don’t make me post the clip I’m posting it
  13. But from a certain point of view (notably, that of a team that’s averaged 78 points for 5 years), they are
  14. It’s not annoying at all. Frankly I sympathize greatly with it. This was me last summer with Skinner. I need to see an incredible argument to convince me the Buffalo Sabres are at a “just get rid of him” stage to see benefit, with pretty much *anyone*. The sabres are beyond little. its like in The Other Guys were he gives Will Ferrell’s character a flat wooden gun. I need to see this franchise not shoot itself in the foot with the most basic of tools before I trust their evaluations on much of anything
  15. I don’t really like the Reinhart comp because Reinhart elevated Eichel demonstrably Skinner would be a better comp. Skinner very much played well next to Eichel, didn’t drag him down, Jack was phenomenal in utilizing him (rebounds).. As you know: I’m the one guy who isn’t throwing skinner out there as a negative. But it’s not wholly a positive. But I wanted to keep skinner. And I’d keep Byram too if we can get the right price and we can’t trade him for better Ya I mean once upon a time VO - Eichel - Skinner was the best ES possession line in hockey There was a stretch I remember it specifically
  16. The key speaking only for me is that yes he’s been good with Dahlin but Dahlin hasn’t benefited. Players don’t seem to benefit from him. The best argument for him then is that he isn’t bringing Tage and Dahlin down. Ie he’s pliable enough that the good of Dahlin is able to course through him and we see it in his numbers. But D who play well with Dahlin aren’t that uncommon, in fact that’s the MAIN extra benefit of having a 1st overall like Dahlin. being good with good players is ok but it’s a far cry from being good with average players or even making good players better Which brings the contract into the conversation: we aren’t going to be able to pay him what he’s actually worth which I do know is an idea you are accounting for
  17. I’m also combining it with my limited viewing eye test and my distaste for the alliteration in his name
  18. One thing we can comfortably say about Byram is he definitely played his minutes tl;dr : Dahlin and Tage are as good or better without Bowen, Bowen is putrid without them
  19. Jets have made the playoffs 7 times of the last 8 years. Of those 7 appearances, Hellebuyck has played well enough to advance beyond the first round 3 of the 7 times. No room for making the playoffs and winning rounds on the Buffalo Sabres And? The exception that proves the rule? Yzerman is the clear statistical outlier along with Adams. We have tried every “strategy” at one point or another. Showing me the failure behind door number 3 ala Monty hall doesn’t prove anything: there will always be a fail we can point to
  20. I think he has a type. Norris is it to a T. Buy low, if things go really well there’s a ton of value to be mined. It’s the “hey, we think there might be a little something here, actually” guys. “Oh with a bigger role this guy should really blossom.” He loves high ceiling players, questionable floor players It has been quite blindly obvious to this poster’s eyes for a very long time that the Buffalo Sabres need to be in the business of targeting the maximization of the floor we’ve been using future verbiage for far, far too long. Give me the guy who is most likely will provide good value: not the guy who has the best chance of producing great “I still don’t want Hellebuyck” ”I don’t care about making the playoffs”
×
×
  • Create New...