GrassValleyGreg

Sure but are guys like Gallagher, Garbutt, Maroon, Dupuis, Eakin, etc? All top 6 guys on top teams. Some very successful teams' approach is balance, and we're getting closer to being afforded the depth to follow that lead. All I'm saying.

Deslauriers - O'Reilly - Ennis Reinhart - Eichel - Larsson Kane - Girgensons- Foligno Gionta - Legwand - McGinn PP Kane - O'Reilly - Ennis Eichel - Risto/Bogo/Franson Deslauriers not enough talent for the cycle game of Ennis/ROR or perfect dirty area presence to complement the two? Kane talent wasted on 3 or electric but individual game ideally matched with two guys who put their heads down and get to the net? Can Eich and Sam (and Larsson for that matter) continue to build chemistry and be enough to maintain Jack's influence on a game? Will Disco Dan put out such a dangerous PP or continue to lean towards an even two units? Hey, I know this is coming off a 3 game run with 129 total shots, but these are great questions to get to ask after years of despair!

Completely on page with this. We are looking more and more like a team who should be at least a bit active. We've outshot our opponents in each of the last 7 games by an average of 10 shots. My first reaction to Huck's trade was hell no, but no doubt it is an intriguing scenario. Also, all this winning lottery talk is triggering some dark depression. Please let us enjoy some hard fought and controlling play before delving our psyche back to 2014.

ROR worth every penny. Possession is so valuable.

I was hyper critical of Sam's NHL readiness heading into the season but he has improved significantly each game. What a treat to see him and Yeichel building some chemistry out there. Although Eich has the tendency to be lackadaisical with the puck, especially so tonight. One of Risto's best games so far. And Grigs, Mouls and Gionta are a solid #3.

Reinhart playing at full confidence. Getting better by the night. Also, Ennis thinking too much out there.

Agree on the splitting of Evander and Eich. Would love to see Jack play with someone with a bit more feel to their game. DB shaking up the lines at the end. Spotted ROR with Gionta and Girgs. We may be at the snake bit point of breaking up our duos.

Our PP has the potential to be dangerous but it looks like DB prefers two equal units. I hope he changes his mind about this. Mouls has no place on a top PP.

The commonly flagged issue with Kane is exaggerated on the PP. Stupid shots are as bad as turnovers.

Same. Let's judge the value of trades by one regular season game.

People who overreacted to a guy coming off a concussion and getting his legs under him in preseason were panicking. Anybody who has seen this guy play at full confidence knows the talent he is. And he showed it tonight. Huge loss.

O'Reilly is such a heady player. Will be a crowd favorite for sure.

So many turnovers on the backend.

Samson kind of looks like ET.

Agree with this

Appreciate it. Eich's backcheck will disrupt. Great example there on the PK.

Hey sorry, could someone recap in a bit more detail the last two goals?

Eichel - O'Reilly - Kane - Ennis on 4 on 3. Dear God this is entertainment.

That acceleration to top speed glide is really unlike anything I've seen. Stupid grin here and a loud laugh at the office!

I don't see Sam flanked by two of the smaller guys on the roster.

Samson gliding and getting lost in the play. I know its not his game but gives no effort in the corners. Not so sure his spot is guaranteed.

Kane - O'Reilly - Ennis Moulson - Eichel - Larson Reinhart - Girgensons - Gionta Foligno - Legwand - McGuinn What center depth. Does Reinhart get his start at wing? Does this portend 9 and AHL? Does Legwand or ROR have ability to play wing?

Definitely excited for the tournament. My point was the sport and the rules that govern it have changed less in 10 years than the NHL and NBA. My larger point was F*** ESPN.

Missed this before and didn't realize ESPN wanted back in the hockey business. Put me in the not happy camp! In an era where most major North American sports have significantly altered rules under the guise of "broadening" fanbases, hockey has been able to maintain it's integrity. Some decision makers have found it profitable to sacrifice defense for the sake of increased scoring (DB rules in football, the joke of NBA refs, etc.). For the most part, hockey today is the same as it was post '05 lockout. Now part of the reason why hockey has been able to insulate itself from this short-sighted trend has to do with the types of players and fans the sport already attracts, and the culture of hockey as a whole. These guys would be just as happy to make 100k a year. But the almighty dollar is the ultimate corruptor. And keeping a healthy distance from the greedy giant mitt of Mickey Mouse has, in my opinion, only strengthened the sport. Plus, I remember the divorce of hockey from ESPN as acrimonious, as if ESPN said go ahead and try to succeed without us. And hockey did just that. Nice to see a multi-national corporation come crawling back, but I'd much rather keep a healthy distance from the disneyfication of sport. Obviously this is just one tournament. But I don't like it!

I know, it's crazy. When you hear comps for Jack, it is almost always two players - a size and body separation guy like a Thornton or Getz and a quick, agile high top-end speed guy. It's pretty tough to find a single guy that captures his assortment of skill.