mjd1001

Pilut will play obviously, and I dont' think he will be that much of a step down. Might even be a bit better than Fitzgerald or Bryson right now. Whoever is the next call up though.....Not so sure I'd have confidence in a lot of ice time for whoever that is.

I've had the game on while doing a few other things, mostly playing attention to it, but that is the first time I heard Quinn's name. I forgot he was even playing tonight.

I don't know a lot about goaltending, but Anderson just seems like he plays the angles really well. He doesn't try to make any huge highlight real saves, but he stays in postion just well enough that his D-men always know what they can expect from him. If the D don't make major mistakes, he won't make many, and they have consistency in their own zone.

He's that type of player. When he doesn't score, he is pretty much invisible and doesn't impact the game in any other way. BUT he has the ability to score at anytime with one simple pass to him.

Olofsson sitting out, maybe. But no way I want to see Krebs in his place unless he plays a lot better. Krebs has been the worst forward this season so far. Sloppy backchecking and inability to control the puck on the boards cost the Sabres 2 goals already, and not picking up his guy on backchecking gave up a couple other prime chances.

Sabres really need this period to end, get to the dressing room...and so...SOMETHING there. Have to play a different game in the 3rd.

I never liked when any announcer says "they are back in this game" To me if a team CAN get back into any game by scoring, then they were never really out of it.

I never liked when any announcer says "they are back in this game" To me if a team CAN get back into any game by scoring, then they were never really out of it.

First period was great. Second period isn't awful for how hey are playing but it is the most boring period of hockey so far this year I have seen from this team.

I think Cozens is also playing better. I just didn't mention him because I didn't want my original post to be longer than it was. As for Girgensons, I think he has been and still is a big part of the team. Some are looking forward to when he won't be here, I am not. He can put the puck in the net occasionally, he is a huge effort buy, a pretty good skater, and a great penalty killer. He is very valuable in his role to this team.

What is different? Mostly Dahlin. Some other very early observations: -Dahlin. I'm not going to declare him the Norris trophy winner now, but he is playing like a superstar. 4 goals, but it goes beyond that. Very few giveways (none of consequence I can remember). On odd man rushes, he is often times the first person back despite often times going deep into the offensive zone. When the Sabres have the puck in the offensive zone, he's always in control....rush him and he'll casually flip the puck to an open man, give him time and he'll take time and let someone come open. In the D-zone he is getting to loose pucks and getting them out of the zone. And he is playing chippy too. Through 4 games, he has been a controlling force on the ice. -Goaltending. Very good so far. In one game you got what you hope for out of Anderson this year, and its early, but MAYBE you are going to get your average-to-above-average goaltender in Comrie. Its early, but at least we know he has that in him. -Hinostoza needs to be in this lineup. I get it, he's not going to continue on the point pace he is on through 2 games and he does make some mistakes. But, he is fast, really fast and he uses that speed. he has pretty good offensive ability. He might be the rare example of a guy you do not want on your first line, but when on the 3rd or 4th line he makes the OTHER 3rd or 4th liners better when they play with him. He is not a star player, but he is one of my favorite players on the team to watch. -Tuch. He is a streaky scorer. I always get concerned he may have a really bad run in the course of a year and it will lead him to only having a 15 goal season. Doesn't look like that so far. Plus, its really, really fun to have a player on your team that is from the area, who is a fan of things in the area (Bills) and someone that is just really fun to root for. -Mittelstadt. I think he needs to be a 50 point player for this team, but the coaching staff seems to trust him with ice time, he is on the PP, penalty kill, and gets regular even strenght time. I'm nervous about his production but so far so good. -Skinner and Olofsson. Please score (other than empty netters) -Krebs. I know from some discussions on this board people disagre with me, but he has not played good this year so far. His ice time is way down. 2 times he lost a battle on the board or couldn't control the puck on the boards and it led to 1 goal and one great scoring chance. One time toward the start of a shift the Sabres had a goal scored against them and if he had more speed he would have been able to backcheck and bother the guy who scored but he just didn't have the speed or he was too far deep in the offensive zone. Now, he was back in the lineup last night and the coaches gave him more ice time, so hopefully that is a good sign. -Samuelsson. I think he is a good player, and I'm happy with the deal he signed. But he does have limitations. After the 3rd time he got the puck in his own zone the last 2 games (that I saw) he got the puck out from behind the net but it was obvious skating speed and acceleration is an issue he needs to work on if possible. I noted this in the gameday forum and a few people disagreed. I'm not sure what game you are watching but there are numerous times where he can't pull away from forecheckers, and often times they are catching him from behind. It happens and its right there to see. Again, I like him, and he did not give the puck up in any of those cases, but the reason he was a 2nd round pick and not a 1st rounder, and the reason he got a $4m deal and not more is he does have limitations. -D depth and Jokiharju. Jokiharju is not Dahlin...he is not a great 1st pair guy. He has gotten caught out of position in the games he has played, and he doesn't take over games. With that said, he is good overall. As much as I like Fitzgerald and Bryson and young guys, it was noticable after he went out of the game that the extra ice time the bottom pairing guys got, there was a little less 'calmness' from them in the D-zone. Jokiharju, despite some mistakes, makes his D-unit better when he is on the ice. -Power. He looked really good last year. This year he is a tad bit more shaky. The last 2 games he has been better though. I think opposing teams may be pressuring him a lot, as soon as he gets near the puck they are running at him. Once he adjusts to the speed of the game, he'll adjust to that a lot more and make some plays out of it. It looks like he is already getting better. Hopefully he'll be in the running for Rookie of the year. But I think he'll be a lot better next year (or even the 2nd half of this year) than he is now.

He is an amazing statistical case. 5th year in the league now. 2 of those years he played nearly half the NHL games for the Kings. And yes, it is early this year, but every single year, without fail so far, his numbers have gotten worse. Both GAA and Save percentage were the best his first year and both have gone down every year, year after year.

I would have liked to see a bit more effort on that PP....it looked like they are just trying to run out the clock, but still 2:30 left

I'm not making an excuse, as I think their play in their own zone could be better in the 3rd....but this is the 2nd road game in a row they are allowing a lot of shorts in the 3rd...also the 2nd game in a row they are on the road and down 1 d-man in the 3rd.

I don't mind Byrson, I think he can keep getting better. But the last game or two, when I see him on the ice in the D-zone I am getting nervous for a goal against.

Even the goal they allowed in the first wasn't a really bad play by anyone. Fitzgerald and Bryson were the D-unit, and it was more of a case of non-communication than anything. Bryson went into the corner after the puck, then followed his guy up the boards. The puck came back toward that side of the net, Fitzgerald WAS in front of the net, but decided to chase the puck into the corner. Cozens went in with him. With Cozens and Fitzgerald both into the corner, and Bryson not having a chance to get off the boards and back to the front of the net, the goal was scored. Had Fiztgerald had a little more time with Bryson, they would likely hold their positions better. That Calgary goal just scored now, give the first assist to the ref.

I like Samuelsson, but it is noticable that he isn't that fast and doesn't have a good first step. when he gets the puck in the Sabres zone, he doesn't have the ability to pull away from any defender.

And he is fast. And he isn't making many mistakes this year so far. He needs to stay in the lineup for a while.

Buffalorising is a website I no longer visit because about a year ago they changed the layout and now it is awful. Before the change, it was simple, one column, all the articles arranged in a row. Nice. But now, you start with a huge banner ad up top, Followed by 3 pictures (2 small and one large) that are clickable for articles in them, then the page changes format again under that to a few more articles (with an ad on the side), then it changes again to videos, then it changes back to articles but now they are smaller with pictures and 2x2. I really wonder sometimes who redesigns things and says "yep, this is way harder to read and to use, but i think it LOOKS slightly better so lets go with it"

Actually the Matthews draft year Buffalo didn't finish last, not even close. They had 81 points, and were 8 spots from the bottom. That is the year the Leafs did tank, finished last, won the lottery, and picked Matthews. One of the funnier things is, there was a big-time tank job by the leafs leading up to that draft...but listen to fans out of Toronto and they say "Buffalo deserves Eichel and not McDavid because they tanked and that was wrong", but they are convinced that isnt' what they did that year.

The thing I like about Dahlin in terms of his defense so far this year is he has the ability, and positioning, to get back. You would think with him pinching and going deep in the offensive zone, he would get caught up ice a lot. But it seems to me not only is that not happening much anymore, often times HE is the one d-man back when his partner gets caught up ice. Being able to control the puck in his own zone, get it out of the zone (and out of danger) because of his carrying/control or first pass ability, and the fact he has the speed and awareness to get back in his zone really well this year....those skills may make him more of an asset keeping the puck out of the Sabres net than a typical 'stay at home, shut down' type of D-man.

In never put much thought to it, but the Sabres have really never had a dominant D-man. Housely was great in the offensive zone, Ramsey, and to a lesser extent Hajt were great in the D-zone. Talinder was balanced but not 'great' in any one aspect of the game. But no-one who you could even say would approach dominant from the Back end. Up front, you had Lafontaine, Mogilney, Perreault, Gare, even Briere and Andreychuk. If not dominant they all had seasons where they were considered legit stars. Of course Hasek in net. But until possibly Dahlin, no one like that on the back end.

Because he was such a big part of this franchise, and especially at the end of his time here such a polarizing figure, there will be a lot of talk about him for a while. Personally, I like talking and posting about his success, or failure, because seeing what he is/turns into has a lot to do with how well the Sabres did in that trade. Does it matter for the team going forward? Nope, not really, but this is a message board and we are fans and the reason many of us are here is we like talking about things that are emotial triggers. Once a game starts and I watch the Sabres, I have zero thoughts about Eichel, but between games, I like to follow the entire NHL, especially players that used to be part of the team.

Great. Glad you agree and took the time out to post that you do.

ALMOST great. Lacking in color..too much white. A bit more blue up top near the shoulders would have done wonders for this. But the way it is, so much white up top it almost has a "plain white T-shirt with a logo" vibe to it. As others have said, no color or no logo on the shoulders makes it just too plain. SO CLOSE!