SABRES 0311

No it’s not the opposite. Antifa uses threat of violence to try to intimidate people on sociopolitical issues. This is what I am talking about. What you said is about them is a total lie. But I’m supposed to believe you on what you think is a threat? Heres a comparison you can understand. Antifa is to the left what the goofball proud boys are to the right. Same but different. Both worthless.

Antifa is the equivalent of the Nazi brown shirts. Then you have the corrupted BLM movement that started burning cities and leftist politicians who showed their solidarity. You guys didn’t seem to mind that but now there seems to be a nazi around every corner. Im sure that’s just a deflection, or irrelevant now, or just never happened.

Irrelevant irrelevant irrelevant. And it’s not contradictory. The onus is on the administration to have the evidence/intelligence to support the act. Neither you, I, or the judge show a reason to do something the act does not require. The exception would be the organization is not sponsored by the country. If the judge brought that up I would probably be on board.

You guys weren’t posting this weird doom stuff when the left tried to dehumanize Trump supporters with the deplorable label. I doubt the left got this emotional when Obama’s IRS targeted conservatives. When the modern day leftist brown shirts, Antifa showed up you guys tried to say they’re not an actual group. 😂

Thats just it. The act does not require due process. https://www.nafsa.org/regulatory-information/alien-enemies-act-1798

They were deported under the Alien Enemies Act. This requires little to no due process. The judge’s reasoning was to provide due process. What was his reason to require something the act does not? If the judge had said the application of the act is the issue because the country in question is not a state sponsor of the terrorist organization, that’s different. The onus is on the Trump administration and DHS. If even one person is innocent then they messed up. By that I mean verified proof. Not some emotional “Trump is a nazi” thing.

The judge offered no proof anyone on the plane was not a member of the terrorist organization. People are actually in favor of bringing terrorists back into the U.S. and you’re saying I’m the one who doesn’t care about the constitution? 😂

The organization they belong to is designated as a terrorist organization. Per an NPR report from March 16 2025: “Last year, the Biden administration labelledTren de Aragua as a transnational criminal organization, and in January, the U.S. government designated the Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization.” It was the Biden administration who labeled them as a terrorist organization. Trump slapped the transnational tag on them.

From the article the reason the judge made his decision was due to potential impacts on non terrorists personnel. That is the dumbest reason I have ever heard for not deporting known members of a terrorist organization. IMO what people are missing is an understanding of what these kinds of people are like. Not race, religion, nationality, religion. I’m talking about mindset and capability. To support what this judge did is as stupid as the judge’s decision. So if the judge has demonstrated this level of poor judgement, why shouldn’t he be impeached?

Not liking terrorists in the U.S. is folly? That’s a new one. Let me guess, terrorists are irrelevant. SMH

I refuse to believe the reason for what the judge did is valid. Instead of removing terrorists he blocks it because of a broad what if. Absolutely stupid or corrupt.

If a judge is that stupid they block removing terrorists then they should be impeached. People are mad the U.S. isn’t sharing intel with Ukraine but have such little faith in those same/similar organizations they came up with an excuse to keep bad guys in the U.S. If someone supports that kind of stupidity just so someone they don’t like takes a loss then they are supporting the bad guys over country. Remember four years ago people in here said supporting/voting for Trump is supporting bigotry and the like? It’s a two way street. If someone wants him to take a loss on this they are in favor of keeping terrorists in the U.S. Sucks doesn’t it?

Wow. Letting terrorists into the country is irrelevant? 😂 Good to know where you stand. Im sure victims of terrorism and those fight against appreciate that. 🤡

I guess trying to send them back to their home country is exactly what the nazis would do. The judge is a hero and is looking out for U.S. citizens by keeping members of a terrorist organization here. They’re just misunderstood I am sure.

So bring members of a gang designated as a terrorist organization back to the U.S.? Seems dumb but ok.

What is ROS?

We don’t need another top two pick that will take years to mature with intermittent flashes of brilliance. We need a mid to late twenties top six center and top four veteran physical defenseman. We need to get older and more experienced.

Whose the lazy one?

I think Muel and Power have been playing better but I am cautious. Multiple years of lost coverage or soft play isn’t made up for by a good stretch. Plus we need to look at if they are what we need now or in five years. I lean towards selling some future to build the now.

True. But I do believe the Sun Tzu idea of no nation ever benefited from prolonged war. Maybe in the short term economically and national morale. Still, that’s young men and women’s lives. IMO war should be the last resort and gain must outweigh the risk.

That’s not what I think he wants. He wants a DMZ like China wants a maritime buffer in the Spratley Islands. Two different areas but same idea. It supports their respective defenses and helps with planning future operations.

Holding and retaking are two different things. If Russia simply goes into the defense to hold the terrain it has taken them what? It’s not a vast area and they have a direct supply line back to the Russian mainland.

That’s very Alex Jones sounding. You think it’s propaganda to say Russia could roll over Ukraine one on one. Get with the reality of the situation. Russia knows if they cross a line then they would get their ***** handed to them by the whole of NATO so they are pushing to the edge without forcing the invocation of article 5. They are trying to force the establishment of a DMZ in eastern Ukraine. Their demand will be no NATO weapons, forces, or membership in Ukraine. The fact people think throwing money at the issue will change Russia holding Crimea and the lands in the east is laughable.

You think it’s irrelevant an entire organization exists to deter Russian aggression and that it’s propaganda to say Russia’s military capabilities far exceed Ukraine’s. 😂 😂

Winters in war suck. Even with present day technology. Any side would take advantage of a post winter/pre spring pause. It helps assess forces, capabilities, and hardware. Being in favor of dragging the war on for any reason means to be in favor of sacrificing lives and infrastructure.