bob_sauve28

Asplund is good on that line, just glad they gave Ok and Girg a talented player

Three times?? Ugh! She is a survivor!

All I’m saying is he may have gotten market value from Bruins, but it would of been above market value for us to get him. With his injury history, I’d pass. Having to over pay to get him and then he might turn out to get hurt, that would of been a tough one to take. We might just be in the same situation now, with him instead of Anderson being the injured goalie.

I'd like to be happy Olli is back but Dell in net? 🙄

Just get over it Confused, did Ullmark want more money and years to come here? That was my understanding, is that correct?

No it wasn't, it was the market if he had to play for the Buffalo Sabres, I sure hope his kids don't go hungry on that cheap contract he signed with the Bruins, sniff 😒

OMG!! You won't tell him I said that are you??? I sure hope not, he might get as bent out of shape about as you are. But probably not. Actually, lol, very much doubt it.

Best wishes to them

Or he comes back and is injured all the time. I couldnt stomach that after giving in to his insulting demands

I have no idea who else they could have gotten. If he passed on a doable deal, or missed an opportunity that seemed obvious then I'd criticize him. I just dont know what was and what was not possible. But that demand from Ullmark sure doesnt give me confidence he wants to play here, and oh ya, the injury history. But I do wish KA had done something better

My understanding is that Ullmark wanted an extra million a year over what the Bruins were offering, would you have paid that? I dunno. I don't blame him for passing on that

So he gets to wear this during games?

Wow, there's some pretty bad goalies on that list! Carter Hutton again makes the list! For the last time I would assume

I just wonder what a trade would look like. We have all those draft picks but can you get a starting goalie for a first round pick? Would we have to give up Mitts or Olli to get a good goaltender? I get people are down 9n Adams, and that might be justified, but the market for goalies isn't great and the price will be high, I would imagine. Now watch, we will send a fourth rounder to some team for a nobody who will turn into the next Vezina winner

Yup, and look at how the best goalie in franchise (league?) history fell into our lap

Thank God for the Sabres, the only sports team I follow. Win lose or lose in shoot out, they are still close to my heart ❤️

The seven days battles! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_Battles Hope we do do better than McClellan and the Union army did then. Rangers are tough

Not sure how this situation gets better soon. Goalies don’t grow on trees and lots of teams are in the market for a goalie. We do have draft picks to trade but the price will probably be high. The lottery ticket strategy of getting lucky and finding someone on waivers or something is that might work, but probably not. Toker has been good, I don’t blame him for last game at all, the defense just has to play better.

Tage does well shielding the puck, also. But good points

Who isn't admitting the team--or any damn team for that matter--doesn't have real issues?? Huh? Ya, they need to get better and part of that if being tougher and more physical. This is at the point of screaming in an echoing cave

Like the Calgary goalie, is the shut out all his? No, he didn't have a very tough night

Yes, humans have biases. That's why auditions for orchestras are done blind. Before they did them blind women never got hired. I have no idea, would depend on the other team. If it had a team of Marios L's and V. Hedmans, I'd go with that team. Which is still an advantage of size

Oh, why would you do that to Bjork???

Sure, talent is key, I'm not arguing otherwise. Never did. But bigger stronger players are valuable and necassary. Do you think a whole team of high talent but smaller players is the way to go?

Obviously.