-
Posts
15,560 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ...
-
No it doesn't.
- 361 replies
-
- explanation
- creation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
You are making up the confines within which this character of yours, "God", would exist. You have to get out of the habit of putting things in packages. "God" would be time, would be all matter and all space and all things otherwise. "God" would be the intangibles and all thought and all silence. "God" would not be some freaky entity in some dimension somewhere...those are what normally are referred to as "God" by common religions, but even those gods had a "God" if you're familiar enough with the literature and/or tales.
- 361 replies
-
- explanation
- creation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
"God" would neither be he or she. "God" would also not live or even exist as those concepts are understood. "God" either is or is not. I would recommend to anyone seriously contemplating the nature of existence and the possibility (probability) of (a) "g/God" to pretty much toss out all symbolism and linear thinking. A LSD or mushroom trip, or two or three, is highly advisable.
- 361 replies
-
- explanation
- creation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Science is rather dogmatic and self-righteous, you're correct.
- 361 replies
-
- explanation
- creation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yeah, the jokesters can come into this thread and bash religious folk here instead of in the science thread, where, ya know, you'd get scorned for making fun of science.
- 361 replies
-
- explanation
- creation
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
WTF is with you people. NO RELIGION. NO POLITICS. It doesn't mean "except when you believe you can look down your nose at people"...it means leave the RELIGION and POLITICAL commentary out, for good or ill. And, FWIW, you have the Chinese "proverb" in the wrong context, it's actually a curse.
-
off topic Star Wars - now with SPOILERS! (Read at your own risk)
... replied to Robviously's topic in The Aud Club
-
Way too early to come to any conclusions. At this point, though, you have to consider what Murray is thinking. He may have a solid plan for a tank, but he'd be a fool to force a tank upon a team that is determined to win. I suggest that Murray will have to have a multi-facted strategy (if he doesn't have one already) that depends on the performance of the team.
-
This particular roster, yes, I agree. But this won't be the roster they have after the deadline, tank or 8th seed.
-
It's a four point gap right now. It's not quite December yet. I think no one, on either side of The Tank, should start worrying themselves until February.
- 5,845 replies
-
This guy cares:
-
I love shoot-outs. They're like the final, tense moments of an action flick where the main character has to make a final decision that ends the climax.
-
Haha! But Flynn shouldn't be in the NHL! That goal doesn't count.
-
Enroth is Zen.
-
Kaleta hurt again or benched?
-
Same old saw, but we're getting an effort from each player. Hodgson and Foligno stand out to me as players who are maxing out - they don't belong on this team.
-
Risto is going to be pretty sore after this game.
-
Wow. Nolan's Hardest Working Team v. II?
-
Stewart is money when he gets a break-away.
-
Marfans?
-
Who was taken off the ice? I was surfing...
-
I don't think Foligno has successfully cleared the zone yet.
-
Sloppy is sexy.
-
Would Nolan just please bench Foligno? Maybe Foligno can be sent out to crush Emelin.
-
Am I in the right GDT?