...
-
Posts
15,355 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ...
-
Dump and chase. We need a better possession game.
-
Honestly, I think Murray is taking that gamble and will allow the team one more chance at the brass ring. I don't see any significant roster moves for the remainder of this season. And with no roster moves, what we're seeing is what we're going to get.
-
Two words: Austin Matthews. Or, alternately: draft lottery.
-
Oh poopy.
-
Yay, Samson. He always earns his goals. I have noticed that, during PP especially, a seemingly new tactic by the Sabrez where they will blindly dish the puck to the high slot. It seems a bit dangerous to me, until they can position themselves better, of course.
-
CLEAR THE ZONE!
-
Yeppers! That's why we tanked. Go for the hatty Jack.
-
Jack Jack with that sniper's eye.
-
WTF, do they think they're all too pretty? What's with the point shots?
-
Eichel's stick-language suggests he's frustrated.
-
I think the Larsson experiment has run its course. That guy isn't an NHL player.
-
Kane seems particularly distracted today.
-
I like Girgensons with Eichel. They just haven't been on a line together much, so Gus doesn't know where Jack will be, yet.
-
Please don't pull the goalie.
-
Screw the goal, did you see how Jack Jack took that face off?
-
Did you see that!?
-
These refs are high. Calling a penalty against Ovechkin.
-
They called a boarding against the Caps? No way. Fire that ref.
-
This is why we can't have shut-outs.
-
J ohnso n Spoils a gr eat nigh t .
-
Foligno was boarded shortly before all of that, no call and no response.
-
Ovechkin elbows Gorges in the head, and puts a stick in Ennis' face all in the same play. And where is our response?
-
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
See! Look, there you are. You have no idea what the facts are, yet, somehow, E. Kane made a poor choice. It's already started. He may have done nothing wrong but, to you, his rep is already sullied due to this information being leaked. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
I'm not talking about the report of the leak, but the leak itself. The information about the investigation should be considered privileged and that prematurely disclosing that information should be subject to prosecution. I understand "defamation" itself is difficult to establish, but I don't believe the legal understanding of defamation covers situations like these and needs to be amended/reconsidered/redefined. It's simply ridiculous to accept the current reality of the seriousness of the charge out-weighing the nature of the evidence and/or the facts. I thought we might have learned from Salem witch trials. It's not news-worthy; it's sensationalism with the only real purpose being to draw readers/viewers. What interest would you or I or anyone else have in this case had the investigation remained under wraps and went no-where like P. Kane's did? Little, especially after the fact. If all we had heard about P. Kane was that someone accused him of rape but the DA felt there wasn't a case worth pursuing, what would the public opinion of P. Kane be then? I would think it would be FAR less vitriolic and divisive than it is now, and ultimately less interesting. It would be a minor footnote to the P. Kane story than a major pock-mark. -
Updated Evander Kane Cleared in Sex Offense Investigation
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Note that I did not say the leak itself was defamation, but rather instigated defamation. I think someone creative might come up with a way to argue that information like this is privileged and the premature public disclosure of this type of information is extremely harmful.